评价机器人辅助胸腔手术（Robot-assisted thoracic surgery，RATS）与传统胸腔镜手术（Video-assisted thoracic surgery，VATS）在肺癌淋巴结整块清扫中的临床疗效。方法：回顾性分析 2017 年 5 月 ~2019 年 12 月在甘肃省人民医院接受达芬奇机器人和胸腔镜进行淋巴结整块清扫手术的 128 例肺癌患者的临床资料，分别为 RATS 组与 VATS 组，其中接受 RATS 的患者 56 例，VATS 72 例。结果：RATS 组与 VATS 组相比，手术时间（171.31min Vs154.26min，P=0.026）、术中失血量（62.29ml Vs 92.73ml，P=0.031）、术后引流时间（5.72d Vs 7.13d，P=0.043）、总引流量（1 105.76ml Vs 1 434.62ml，P=0.017）、术后住院时间（7.25d Vs 9.36d，P=0.003）、淋巴结清扫总数（17.38 个 Vs 12.93 个，P=0.045）比较，差异具有统计学意义。而两组术后并发症比较，差异没有统计学意义（P>0.05）。但 RATS 组在进行左肺上叶手术时以及清扫 2、4、7 组淋巴结时比 VATS 组更具有显著优势，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：机器人系统在肺癌根治术淋巴结清扫中，操作安全、创伤小，且在清扫胸部淋巴结时更加有效，更利于患者的术后恢复，能减少复发及转移的可能性，使患者切实获益。

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and traditional thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in lung cancer lymph node dissection. Methods: 128 patients with lung cancer who underwent whole lymph node dissection by Da Vinci robot and thoracoscopy in our hospital from May 2017 to December 2019 were selected, 56 patients received RATS and 72 patients received VATS. The clinical data was analyzed with SPSS22.0 software. Results: RATS group Vs VATS group, surgery time (171.31min Vs 154.26min; P=0.026), intraoperative blood loss (62.29ml Vs 92.73ml, P=0.031), postoperative drainage time (5.72d Vs 7.13d, P=0.043), total drainage volume (1105.76ml Vs 1434.62ml, P=0.017), postoperative hospital stay (7.25d Vs 9.36d, P=0.003), total lymph node dissection (17.38 Vs 12.93, P=0.045), the difference was statistically significant.There was no significant difference between the two groups on postoperative complications (P>0.05). However, the RATS group had a significant advantage over the VATS group in the operation on the upper lobe of left lung and the dissection of 2, 4 and 7 groups of lymph node (P<0.05). Conclusion: The robot system is safe and effective in lymph node dissection of lung cancer.It is more effective and conducive to the postoperative recovery of patients in chest lymph node dissection, which also could lower the possibility of recurrence and metastasis.

收稿日期：2020-02-12  录用日期：2020-05-12

Received Date: 2020-02-12  Accepted Date: 2020-05-12

基金项目：甘肃省卫生行业科研计划项目（GSWSKY2017-56）

Foundation Item: Supported Program of Health Industry Scientific Research Project of Gansu Province (GSWSKY2017-56)

通讯作者：柏启州，Email：baiqizhou1981@aliyun.com

Corresponding Author: BAI Qizhou, Email: baiqizhou1981@aliyun.com

引用格式：苟云久，王兵，金大成，等 . 达芬奇机器人与胸腔镜在肺癌淋巴结整块清扫中的对比研究 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志，2020，1（2）:134-140.

Citation: GOU Y J, WANG B, JIN D C, et al.Comparative study between Da Vinci robot and thoracoscopy in whole lymph node dissection of lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 1 (2):134-140.

[1] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2018, 68(6): 394- 424. 

[2] Keenan R J, Landreneau R J, Maley R H Jr, et al.Segmental resection spares pulmonary function in patients with stage I lung cancer [J].Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2004, 78 (1): 228. 

[3] 曾智理 , 李单青 , 李力 , 等 . 电视胸腔镜辅助小切 口肺叶切除治疗周围型肺癌 [J].中国微创外科杂志 , 2009, 9(8): 694-695. 

[4] 王述民 , 曲家骐 , 侯维平 , 等 . 完全电视胸腔镜和 胸腔镜辅助小切口型肺叶切除术 481 例 [J]. 中华胸 心血管外科杂志 , 2010, 26 (9): 310-311. 

[5] Swanson S J, D’Amico T A, Demmy T L, et al.Videoassisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802-a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study [J].Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007, 25 (31): 4993. 

[6] van Hillegersberg R, Seesing M F, Brenkman H J, et al.Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2017, 88 (Suppl 1): 7-11. 

[7] McKcnna R J Jr, Houck W, Fuller C B, et al.Videoassisted thorack surgery lobectomy: expericnce with 1100 cases[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006, 81 (2): 421-425. 

[8] 剑锋 , 杨帆 , 李运 , 等 . 连续 100 例全胸腔镜下肺 叶切除术的临床分析 [J] 中国胸心血管外科临床杂 志 , 2009, 16 (1): 1-5. 

[9] 柏启州 , 苟云久 , 于珺 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人左肺上 叶切除术与淋巴结清除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的临 床效果 [J]. 世界临床医学 , 2017, 11 (23): 17. 

[10] Veronesi G.Robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: results and operating technique [J].Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2015, 7 (Suppl 2): S122. 

[11] Rinieri P, Peillon C, Sala N M, et al.Perioperative outcomes of video-and robot-assisted segmentectomies [J].Asian Cardiovascular & Thoracic Annals, 2016, 24 (2): 145. 

[12] 马继龙 , 金大成 , 韩松辰 , 等 . 早期肺癌患者行达 芬奇机器人与胸腔镜肺癌根治术的病例对照研究 [J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志 , 2019, 26 (1): 48- 52. 

[13] Louie B E, Wilson J L, Kim S, et al.Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic Approaches for Clinical Stage I and Stage II NonSmall Cell Lung Cancer Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database [J].Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2016, 102 (3): 917-924. 

[14] Demir A, Ayalp K, Ozkan B, et al.Robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery lung segmentectomy for malignant and benign lesions[J].Interactive Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, 2014, 20 (3): 304. 

[15] BAO F, ZHANG C, YANG Y, et al.Comparison of robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis [J].Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2016, 8 (7): 1798-1803. 

[16] WEI S Y, CHEN M H, NAN C, et al. Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 15(1): 98. 

[17] 苟云久 , 马继龙 , 姚亮 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人和胸腔 镜辅助胸外科手术治疗非小细胞肺癌有效性和安 全性的 Meta 分析 [J]. 中国循证医学杂志 , 2017, 17 (6): 47-54. 

[18] Yan T D, Black D, Bannon P G, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(15): 2553-2562. 

[19] Dziedzic R, Marjanski T, Binczyk F, et al.Favourable outcomes in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer operated on by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2018, 54(3): 547-553. 

[20] Wei B, Eldaif S M, Cerfolio R J.Robotic lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer[J].Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2016, 25(3): 515-531. 

[21] Licht P B, Jørgensen O D, Ladegaard L, et al.A national study of nodal upstaging after thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer[J].Ann Thorac Surg, 2013, 96(3): 943-949. 

[22] Rocha A T, McCormack M, Montana G, et al.Association between lower lobe location and upstaging for earlystage non-small cell lung cancer[J].Chest, 2004, 125(4): 1424-1430. 

[23] Toosi K, Velez-Cubian F O, Glover J, et al.Upstaging and survival after robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer[J].Surgery, 2016, 160(5): 1211-1218. 

[24] Rocha A T, McCormack M, Montana G, et al.Association between lower lobe location and upstaging for earlystage non-small cell lung cancer[J].Chest, 2004, 125(4): 1424-1430. 

[25] Lee B E, Shapiro M, Rutledge J R, et al.Nodal upstaging in robotic and video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for clinical N0 lung cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2015, 100(1): 229-233. 

[26] Byrn J C, Schluender S, Divino C M, et al.Threedimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the Da Vinci Robot System[J].Am J Surg, 2007, 193 (4): 519- 522. 

[27] Brian E L, Alexander S F, Aye R W.Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases[J].Ann Torac Surg, 2012, 93 (5): 1598-1605.