机器人手术代表目前微创技术的最高水平。2005 年食品与药品管理局（FDA）批准达芬奇机器人手 术系统应用于妇科，现已在临床上广泛应用。达芬奇机器人具有 3D 高清影像、运动缩放、震颤滤过、灵活的手臂 内腕等技术，有效克服了传统腹腔镜手术及开腹手术的局限性。而现阶段达芬奇机器人的应用也存在其自身劣势， 如高昂的成本、缺乏触觉反馈、手术时间增加等。通过查阅国内外文献，本文阐述达芬奇机器人手术在治疗妇科良 恶性疾病的应用优势、局限性和争议，并介绍机器人系统最新研究进展，以期为机器人在妇科临床的应用提供参考 依据。

Robotic surgery represents the highest level of minimally invasive technology at present. The Da Vinci robotic surgical system had been approved by the food and drug administration (FDA) to be adopted into gynecology in 2005, which has been widely used in clinical practice for now. The Da Vinci robot is equipped with 3D high-definition imaging system, vibrating filtering system, flexible arm wrist and other technologies, which can break the limitations of traditional laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy effectively. However, the Da Vinci robot has its own disadvantages, such as high costs, lack of tactile feedback and increased operation time. By reviewing domestic and foreign literatures, the advantages, limitations and disputes of the application of Da Vinci robot surgery in gynecological benign and malignant diseases are expounded in this paper, the latest research progress of robotic surgery system is introduced, hopefully to provide references for the application of robot-assisted surgical system in gynecological practice.

收稿日期：2020-02-25  录用日期：2020-05-10 

Received Date: 2020-02-25  Accepted Date: 2020-05-10 

通讯作者：王海琳，Email：hailinwang2017@163.com 

Corresponding Author: WANG Hailin, Email: hailinwang2017@163.com 

引用格式：冯淑杰，曲波，聂夏子，等 . 机器人手术在妇科领域的应用现状及进展 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志，2020，1（3）：212- 219. 

Citation: FENG S J, QU B, NIE X Z, et al. Application status and progress of robotic surgery in gynecology [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 1 (3):212-219.

[1] Lawrie T A, Liu H, Lu D, et al.Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 4 (4): Cd011422. 

[2] Fuchs Weizman N, Einarsson J I, Wang K C, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and associated morbidities[J]. JSLS, 2015, 19 (2): e2013.00351. 

[3] Uccella S, Ceccaroni M, Cromi A, et al.Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12, 398 hysterectomies: effect of different types of colpotomy and vaginal closure[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 120 (3): 516-523. 

[4] Nick A M, Lange J, Frumovitz M, et al. Rate of vaginal cuff separation following laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2011, 120 (1): 47-51. 

[5] Wright J D, Ananth C V, Lewin S N, et al.Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterecto-my among women with benign gynecologic disease[J]. JAMA, 2013, 309 (7): 689-698. 

[6] Stewart E A, Cookson C L, Gandolfo R A, et al. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review[J]. BJOG, 2017, 124 (10): 1501-1512. 

[7] WANG T, TANG H, XIE Z, et al.Robotic-assisted vs.laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2018, 27 (5): 249-264. 

[8] Flyckt R, Soto E, Nutter B, et al.Comparison of LongTerm Fertility and Bleeding Outcomes after RoboticAssisted, Laparoscopic, and Abdominal Myomectomy[J]. Obstet Gynecol Int, 2016.DOI: 10.1155/2016/2789201. 

[9] 王遥 , 杨佳欣 . 机器人手术系统在妇科领域的应用 [J]. 协和医学杂志 , 2019, 10 (4): 375-380. 

[10] Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al.Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013.DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD004014.pub5. 

[11] De Gouveia De Sa M, Claydon L S, Whitlow B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27 (1): 3-17. 

[12] Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, et al.Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2005, 19 (9): 1200-1203. 

[13] Visco A G, Advincula A P.Robotic gynecologic surgery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 112 (6): 1369-1384. 

[14] Berlanda N, Frattaruolo M P, Aimi G, et al. “Money for nothing”. The role of robotic-assisted laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2017, 35 (4): 435-444. 

[15] Luu T H, Uy-kroh M J.New Developments in Surgery for Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 60 (2): 245-251. 

[16] Levey K A. Use of fluorescence imaging technology to identify peritoneal endometriosis: a case report of new technology[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2014, 24 (2): e63-65. 

[17] Guan X, Nguyen M T A, Walsh T M, et al.Robotic Single-Site Endometriosis Resection Using Firefly Technology[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016, 23 (1): 10-11. 

[18] Soto E, Luu T H, Liu X, et al.Laparoscopy vs. Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 107 (4): 996-1002.e1003. 

[19] Araujo S E, Seid V E, Marques R M, et al.Advantages of the robotic approach to deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: because less is more[J]. J Robot Surg, 2016, 10 (2): 165-169. 

[20] Cusimano M C, Simpson A N, Dossa F, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 221 (5): 410-428.e419. 

[21] Corrado G, Vizza E, Cela V, et al.Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2018, 44 (12): 1935- 1941. 

[22] Rossi E C, Kowalski L D, Scalici J, et al. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2017, 18 (3): 384-392. 

[23] Boggess J F, Gehrig P A, Cantrell L, et al.A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hyst-erectomy[J]. Am J Obstetr Gynecol, 2008, 199 (4): 357e1-7. 

[24] Kruijdenberg C B, Van den Einden L C, Hendriks J C, et al.Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2010, 120 (3): 334-339. 

[25] Ramirez P T, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al.Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379 (20): 1895-1904. 

[26] Cusimano M C, Baxter N N, Gien L T, et al.Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 221 (6): 619.e1-619.e24. 

[27] Ohlmann C H, Hadaschik B.Re: Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer[J]. Eur Urol, 2019, 75 (5): 875. 

[28] LIU M, LI L, HE Y, et al.Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the surgical management of earlystage ovarian cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2014, 24 (2): 352-357. 

[29] SHI C, GAO Y, YANG Y, et al.Comparison of efficacy of robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2019, 17 (1): 162. 

[30] 陈淑英 , 纪妹 , 赵曌 , 等 . 机器人手术系统与腹腔 镜在卵巢癌手术中应用效果的 Meta 分析 [J]. 现代 妇产科进展 , 2019, 28 (2): 97-100. 

[31] Facer B, Wang F, Grijalva C G, et al.Survival Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy Versus Traditional Laparoscopy in Clinical Stage I Epithelial Ovarian Cancer[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 222 (5): 474.e1- 474.e12. 

[32] 叶明侠 , 李立安 , 李利 , 等 . 机器人辅助腹腔镜行 卵巢癌手术 13 例分析 [J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志 ( 电 子版 ), 2015, 8 (5): 5-9. 

[33] Abitbol J, Gotlieb W, Zeng Z, et al.Incorporating robotic surgery into the management of ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2019, 29 (9): 1341-1347. 

[34] 孟元光 , 翟青枝 . 达芬奇机器人系统在妇科领域的 应用进展及展望 [J]. 妇产与遗传 ( 电子版 ), 2019, 9 (2): 10-13. 

[35] 顾圆圆 , 周冠楠 , 丁景新 . 机器人单孔腹腔镜在妇 科手术中应用进展 [J]. 中国临床医学 , 2020, 27 (1): 136-139. 

[36] 纪妹 , 刘亚芬 . 机器人辅助腹腔镜在妇科经自然腔 道内镜手术中的应用 [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂 志 , 2019, 35 (12): 1321-1324. 

[37] Bertolo R, Garisto J, Gettman M, et al.Novel System for Robotic Single-port Surgery: Feasibility and State of the Art in Urology[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2018, 4 (5): 669-673. 

[38] Abdel Raheem A, Troya I S, Kim D K, et al.Robotassisted Fallopian tube transection and anastomosis using the new REVO-I robotic surgical system: feasibility in a chronic porcine model[J]. BJU Int, 2016, 118 (4): 604-609. 

[39] Kim D K, Park D W, Rha K H. Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy with the REVO-I Robot Platform in Porcine Models[J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69 (3): 541-542. 

[40] Peters B S, Armijo P R, Krause C, et al.Review of emerging surgical robotic technology[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32 (4): 1636-1655. 

[41] Fanfani F, Monterossi G, Fagotti A, et al.The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30 (1): 215-221. 

[42] Fanfani F, Restaino S, Rossitto C, et al.Total Laparoscopic (S-LPS) versus TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy: A Case-Control Study[J]. Journal Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016, 23 (6): 933-938. 

[43] Fanfani F, Restaino S, Rossitto C, et al.Total Laparoscopic (S-LPS) versus TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy: A Case-Control Study [J]. Journal Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016, 23 (6): 933- 938.