中国的机器人外科学杂志 | ISSN 2096-7721 | CN 10-1650/R

机器人与腹腔镜下远端 T1 期胃癌根治术的临床疗效对比

Comparison of clinical efficacy between robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for T1 gastric cancer

作者:覃新干,陈俊强,刘金禄,邓国飞,冼书林,王震,陈之白,慕光川,毛远天,吴向华,田磊,陆利生,贾葵,何毅强

1 No. 4 Oct. 2020 DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2020.04.005 发布日期:2022-08-06
关键词:机器人;腹腔镜;远端胃癌根治术;T1 期胃癌

作者简介:

探讨机器人远端 T1 期胃癌根治术的可行性。方法:回顾性分析 2016 年 1 月 ~2020 年 1 月广西 医科大学第一附属医院胃肠腺体外科收治的行远端 T1 期胃癌根治术的 63 例患者的临床资料,其中机器人组 37 例, 腹腔镜组 26 例。对比两组患者临床病理资料、术中指标及术后恢复指标。结果:两组患者资料有可比性。与腹腔 镜组相比,机器人组手术时间更长 [(324.41±56.27)min Vs(284.19±47.56)min,P=0.004];而术中失血量(P=0.742)、 淋巴结清扫数(P=0.696)、引流管拔除时间(P=0.851)、经口进食时间(P=0.483)、首次下床活动时间(P=0.335)、 首次肛门排气时间(P=0.872),以及术后 6h、24h、48h、72h、96h 数字疼痛评分(P=0.175、P=0.753、P=0.503、 P=0.632、P=0.406)、术后住院天数(P=0.108)和术后 2 周内并发症(P=1.000)等未见明显差异。结论:机器人 应用于远端 T1 期胃癌根治术是安全、可行的。

To explore the feasibility of robotic distal gastrectomy for T1 Gastric Cancer. Methods: The clinical data of 63 T1 gastric cancer patients (37 patients underwent robotic distal gastrectomy and 26 patients underwent conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy) at the Department of Gastrointestinal Gland Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2016 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical pathological data, intraoperative indexes and postoperative recovery indexes of the two groups were compared. Results: Patient characteristics were well matched. Compared with the laparoscopic group, the operation time of the robot group was longer [(324.41±56.27)min Vs (284.19±47.56)min, P=0.004],while the intraoperative blood loss (P=0.742),the number of lymph node dissection (P=0.696), drainage tube removal time (P=0.851), oral feeding time (P=0.483), time to get out of bed for the first time (P=0.335), time of first anal exhaust (P=0.872), numerical rating scale of 6h, 24h, 48h, 72h and 96h after sugery(P=0.175,0.753,0.503,0.632,0.406), postoperative hospital stays (P=0.108)and postoperative complications within 2 weeks (P=1.000) showed no significant differences. Conclusion: Robotic distal gastrectomy in treating T1 Gastric Cancer is safe and feasible

稿件信息

收稿日期:2020-04-10  录用日期:2020-06-20 Received Date: 2020-04-10  

Accepted Date: 2020-06-20 

基金项目:广西卫生健康委员会基金项目(桂卫适宜技术 S201657,桂卫 Z2009101) 

Foundation Item: Guangxi medical and health appropriate technology development and promotion application project(S201657, Z2009101) 

引用格式:覃新干,陈俊强,刘金禄,等 . 机器人与腹腔镜下远端 T1 期胃癌根治术的临床疗效对比 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志, 2020,1(4):258-265. 

Citation: QIN X G, CHEN J Q, LIU J L, et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy between robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for T1 gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 1(4): 258-265.

参考文献

[1] Costantino C L, Mullen J T. Minimally Invasive Gastric Cancer Surgery[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2019, 28(2): 201-213.  

[2] Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Robot-assisted gastric surgery[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2003, 83(6): 1429-1444. 

[3] 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组 . 腹 腔镜胃癌手术操作指南 (2007 版 )[J]. 中华消化外科 杂志 , 2007, 6(6): 476-480. 

[4] 中国研究型医院学会机器人与腹腔镜外科专业委 员会 . 机器人胃癌手术专家共识 (2015 版 )[J]. 中华 消化外科杂志 , 2016, 15(1): 7-11. 

[5] 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组 , 中 国研究型医院学会机器人与腹腔镜外科专业委员会 . 腹腔镜胃癌手术操作指南 (2016 版 ) [J]. 中华消 化外科杂志 , 2016, 15(9) : 851-857. 

[6] Kuramoto M, Shimada S, Ikeshima S, et al. Extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage as a standard prophylactic strategy for peritoneal recurrence in patients with gastric carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(2): 242-246. 

[7] Shinohara T, Satoh S, Kanaya S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(1): 286-294.  

[8] Reyes C D, Weber K J, Gagner M, et al. Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy. A retrospective review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2001, 15(9): 928-931. 

[9] Kim H I, Han S U, Yang H K, et al. Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 263(1): 103-109. 

[10] GAO Y, XI H, QIAO Z, et al. Comparison of roboticand laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: updated short- and long-term results[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(2): 528-534. 

[11] Hong S S, Son S Y, Shin H J, et al. Can Robotic Gastrectomy Surpass Laparoscopic Gastrectomy by Acquiring Long-Term Experience? A Propensity Score Analysis of a 7-Year Experience at a Single Institution[J]. J Gastric Cancer, 2016, 16(4): 240-246. 

[12] Hikage M, Tokunaga M, Makuuchi R, et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(6): 1803-1810. 

[13] Roh C K, Choi S, Seo W J, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between integrated robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 485. 

[14] LU J, ZHENG H L, LI P, et al. A Propensity ScoreMatched Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Oncological, Cost, and Surgical Stress Analysis[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2018, 22(7): 1152-1162.

印象笔记
有道云笔记
微博
QQ空间
微信
二维码
意见反馈