微创手术目前已被大多数结直肠外科医生所认可，但腹腔镜手术存在其固有的局限性，包括立体视 觉缺失、镜头不稳定、人体工程学设计不良、器械僵硬以及操作震颤等。目前，机器人外科手术系统提供了解决方案， 包括稳定的 3-D 视野、灵活的腕式器械、良好的人体工程学设计以及震颤过滤功能。机器人辅助结直肠手术的可行 性、安全性和临床有效性都已得到了广泛验证。机器人手术在肿瘤学上是安全的，其结局可与常规腹腔镜手术相媲美， 甚至在直肠癌手术中具有更多的益处，其在狭窄骨盆中操作更方便、吻合口漏发生率低、环周切缘阳性率低、术后 肠道功能恢复快，且自主神经功能保持更完好。虽然机器人手术增加了手术时间和住院费用，但相较于其潜在的优势， 可以预见在不久的将来，机器人手术系统将成为结直肠常规手术实践的重要组成部分。

Minimally invasive surgery is currently accepted by most colorectal surgeons, but laparoscopic surgery has its intrinsic limitations, such as poor stereoscopic vision, unstable assistant-dependent camera, poor deign of ergonomics, rigid instruments and enhanced tremor during operation. Robotic surgery systems were designed to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery by providing stable 3-D field views from a surgeon-controlled camera, angulated instruments with 7 degrees of freedom, markedly improved ergonomics and tremor filtering system. The feasibility, safety, and clinical effectiveness of robotassisted colorectal surgery have been widely confirmed. Outcomes of robotic surgery is comparable to conventional laparoscopic surgery and even better in rectal cancer surgery, such as more convenient operation in narrow pelvis, lower incidence of anastomotic leak, lower positive rate of circumferential resection margin, faster recovery of intestinal function after surgery and better perseveration of autonomic nerve function. Although operation time and hospitalization costs increased, considering its potential advantages, it is foreseeable that robot-assisted surgery will play an important role in routine colorectal surgery in the near future.

收稿日期：2020-02-07  录用日期：2020-05-22 

Received Date: 2020-02-07  Accepted Date: 2020-05-22 

基金项目：济南市科技计划项目（201907068）；山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目（2018WSB01021）；山东省重点研发计划 项目（2017GSF221018） 

Foundation Item: Science & Technology Planning Project of Jinan City (201907068); Medical and Health Technology Development Program in Shandong Province(2018WSB01021); Key Research & Development planning Project of Shandong Province(2017GSF221018) 

通讯作者：靖昌庆，Email：jing66510122@sina.com Corresponding Author: JING Changqing, Email: jing66510122@sina. com 

引用格式：连国栋，李乐平，靖昌庆 . 机器人结直肠手术的局限与前景 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志，2020，1（4）：286-293. 

Citation: LIAN G D, LI L P, JING C Q. Limitations and prospects of robot-assisted colorectal surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 1(4):286-293.

[1] Jacobs M, Verdeja J C, Goldstein H S. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy)[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1(3): 144-150. 

[2] Araujo S E, Seid V E, Klajner S. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(39): 14359-14370. 

[3] Mak T W, Lee J F, Futaba K, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review of current practice[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2014, 6(6): 184-193. 

[4] Andolfi C, Umanskiy K. Appraisal and Current Considerations of Robotics in Colon and Rectal Surgery[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(2): 152-158. 

[5] Weber P A, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al. Teleroboticassisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease[J]. Dis Colon Rectum 2002, 45(12): 1689-1694; discussion 1695-1686. 

[6] Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna M H, Carmichael J C, et al. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(7): 2792-2798. 

[7] deSouza A L, Prasad L M, Park J J, et al. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2010, 53(7): 1000-1006. 

[8] Deutsch G B, Sathyanarayana S A, Gunabushanam V, et al. Robotic Vs laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience[J]. Surg Endosc 2012, 26(4): 956-963. 

[9] Morpurgo E, Contardo T, Molaro R, et al. Roboticassisted intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a case control study[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2013, 23(5): 414-417. 

[10] Rondelli F, Balzarotti R, Villa F, et al. Is robot-assisted laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than the conventional laparoscopic procedure? A meta-analysis of short-term outcomes[J]. Int J Surg, 2015. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ijsu. 2015. 04. 044. 

[11] Widmar M, Keskin M, Strombom P, et al. Lymph node yield in right colectomy for cancer: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19(10): 888-894. 

[12] WU Q, JIN C, HU T, et al. Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2017, 27(4): 348- 357. 

[13] Akram W M, Al-Natour R H, Albright J, et al. A propensity score-matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted right colectomy in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway[J]. Am J Surg, 2018, 216(6): 1095-1100. 

[14] Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, et al. Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(6): 1512- 1521. 

[15] Solaini L, Bazzocchi F, Cavaliere D, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(3): 1104-1110. 

[16] Halabi W J, Kang C Y, Jafari M D, et al. Roboticassisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes[J]. World J Surg, 2013, 37(12): 2782-2790. 

[17] Tyler J A, Fox J P, Desai M M, et al. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(4): 458- 466. 

[18] Davis B R, Yoo A C, Moore M, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy: cost and clinical outcomes[J]. JSLS, 2014, 18(2): 211-224. 

[19] Casillas M A Jr, Leichtle S W, Wahl W L, et al. Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations[J]. Am J Surg, 2014, 208(1): 33-40. 

[20] Parfitt J R, Driman D K. The total mesorectal excision specimen for rectal cancer: a review of its pathological assessment[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2007, 60(8): 849-855. 

[21] Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial[J]. Lancet, 2009, 373(9666): 821-828. 

[22] Speicher P J, Englum B R, Ganapathi A M, et al. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262(6): 1040-1045. 

[23] Park S Y, Choi G S, Park J S, et al. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(1): 48-55. 

[24] LIAO G, LI Y B, ZHAO Z, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery versus open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer: the current evidence[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 26981. 

[25] ZHANG X, WEI Z, BIE M, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(12): 5601- 5614. 

[26] Kang J, Yoon K J, Min B S, et al. The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison-open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 257(1): 95-101. 

[27] D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, et al. Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(6): 1887-1895. 

[28] Valverde A, Goasguen N, Oberlin O, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphinctersaving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(10): 4085-4091. 

[29] Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al. Effect of RoboticAssisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(16): 1569-1580. 

[30] Ahmed J, Cao H, Panteleimonitis S, et al. Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19(12): 1092-1099. 

[31] Kim J Y, Kim N K, Lee K Y, et al. A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(8): 2485-2493. 

[32] WANG G, WANG Z, JIANG Z, et al. Male urinary and sexual function after robotic pelvic autonomic nervepreserving surgery for rectal cancer[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2016.DOI: 10.1002/res.1725. 

[33] Park S Y, Choi G S, Park J S, et al. Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(7): 1834-1842. 

[34] Lee L, Wong-Chong N, Kelly J J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(2): 460-470.