比较达芬奇机器人系统和腹腔镜在右半结肠癌手术中的临床疗效，探讨达芬奇机器人右半结肠切除术的安全性及可行性。方法：回顾性分析2016 年6 月~2019 年8 月在甘肃省人民医院肛肠科行腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的患者48 例，行机器人右半结肠切除术的患者58 例。围手术期的结果包括手术时间、术中失血量、通气时间、流质饮食时间、所获淋巴结的数目、术后住院时间以及总费用等。结果：腹腔镜组术中中转开腹率为2％，机器人组无术中中转开腹。机器人组术后住院时间明显短于腹腔镜组，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.001）。两组患者术后30d 的死亡率为零。机器人组平均清扫淋巴结总数为14.24 枚，腹腔镜组平均清扫淋巴结总数为14.35 枚，两组未见明显差异。结论：达芬奇机器人系统行右半结肠切除术是安全、可行的。与腹腔镜组手术相比，机器人组术后住院时间短，近期肿瘤学的结果安全可靠，可作为右半结肠癌治疗的有效手段之一。

To compare the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic and robotic colectomy in right-sided coloncancer. Methods: 48 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy (LC group) and 58 patients underwent robotic colectomy (RCgroup) for right-sided colon cancer from June 2016 to August 2019 at Gansu Provincial Hospital were enrolled in this study.The operation time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus, duration of the liquid diet, number of harvested lymph nodes,postoperative hospital stay and total costs of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results: The conversion rate to opensurgery due to technical issues in the LC group was 2% (1/48) and in the RC group was 0% (0/58). The mean postoperativehospital stay of patients underwent RC was shorter than patients underwent LC (P<0.001). The 30-day mortality was zero and nosignificant difference was observed in respect to specific complications between the two groups. The total number of harvestedlymph nodes was 14.24 in the RC group and 14.35 in the LC group. Conclusion: The present study suggests that RC is morebeneficial for patients due to its shorter hospital stay. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to determine anysignificant benefit on the use of RC compared to LC.

收稿日期：2020-03-21 录用日期：2020-06-22

Received Date: 2020-03-21 Accepted Date: 2020-06-22

基金项目：甘肃省自然科学基金（18JR3RA055）；甘肃省青年科技基金（17JR5RA031）；甘肃省卫健委项目（GSWSKY-2019-69）；甘肃省人民医院科研基金（18GSSY1-2；20GSSY1-6；20GSSY3-1；20GSSY4-9）；兰州市科技发展指导性计划（2017-ZD-42）

Foundation Item: Natural Science Foundation of Gansu (18JR3RA055); Youth Science and Technology Foundation of Gansu(17JR5RA031); Project of Health Commission of Gansu Province (GSWSKY-2019-69); Natural Science Foundation of GansuProvincial Hospital (18GSSY1-2, 20GSSY1-6, 20GSSY3-1, 20GSSY4-9); Science and Technology Development GuidingProject of Lanzhou(2017-ZD-42)

通讯作者：杨熊飞，Email：yangxiongfeiphd@163.com；张维胜，Email：980822143@qq.com；杜斌斌，Email：dubinbin2020@163.com

Corresponding Author: YANG Xiongfei, Email: yangxiongfeiphd@163. com; ZHANG Weisheng, Email: 980822143@qq. com;DU Binbin, E-mail: dubinbin2020@163. com

引用格式：史新龙，朱小龙，王赫，等. 机器人与腹腔镜在右半结肠癌切除术中的疗效对比[J]. 机器人外科学杂志，2020，1（5）：307-316.

Citation: SHI X L, ZHU X L, WANG H, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided colon cancer: short-termoutcomes from a single center[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 1(5):307-316.

注：史新龙，朱小龙为共同第一作者

Co-first Author: SHI Xinlong, ZHU Xiaolong

[1] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancerstatistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence andmortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.

[2] Lorenzon L, La Torre M, Ziparo V, et al. Evidence basedmedicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer:evidences, benefits and limitations of the laparoscopicvs open resection[J]. World journal of gastroenterology,2014, 20(13): 3680-3692.

[3] Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, et al. A metaanalysisof the short-and long-term results of randomizedcontrolled trials that compared laparoscopy-assistedand conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer[J].Journal of Cancer, 2011. DOI: 10. 7150/jca. 3621

[4] Rondelli F, Trastulli S, Avenia N, et al. Is laparoscopic◆论著·Article ◆316right colectomy more effective than open resection?A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomizedstudies[J]. Colorectal disease: the official journal ofthe Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain andIreland, 2012, 14(8): e447-469.

[5] Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop W C, et al. Survival afterlaparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for coloncancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinicaltrial[J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2009, 10(1): 44-52.

[6] Heemskerk J, Zandbergen H R, Keet S W, et al. Relax,it’s just laparoscopy! A prospective randomized trialon heart rate variability of the surgeon in robot-assistedversus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Digestive surgery, 2014, 31(3): 225-232.

[7] Butler K A, Kapetanakis V E, Smith B E, et al. Surgeonfatigue and postural stability: is robotic better thanlaparoscopic surgery? [J]. Journal of laparoendoscopic &advanced surgical techniques Part A, 2013, 23(4): 343-346.

[8] Hubert N, Gilles M, Desbrosses K, et al. Ergonomicassessment of the surgeon’s physical workloadduring standard and robotic assisted laparoscopicprocedures[J]. The international journal of medicalrobotics and computer assisted surgery: MRCAS, 2013,9(2): 142-147.

[9] Weber P A, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al. Teleroboticassistedlaparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomiesfor benign disease[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45(12):1689-1694, discussion 1695-1696.

[10] Kang J, Park Y A, Baik S H, et al. A Comparisonof Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery in theTreatment of Right-sided Colon Cancer[J]. Surgicallaparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques,2016, 26(6): 497-502.

[11] Ferrara F, Piagnerelli R, Scheiterle M, et al.Laparoscopy Versus Robotic Surgery for ColorectalCancer: A Single-Center Initial Experience[J]. Surgicalinnovation, 2016, 23(4): 374-380.

[12] Dolejs S C, Waters J A, Ceppa E P, et al. Laparoscopicversus robotic colectomy: a national surgical qualityimprovement project analysis[J]. Surgical endoscopy.2017, 31(6): 2387-2396.

[13] Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, et al. Robotic rightcolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis comparedwith laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal andintracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentrestudy[J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2015, 29(6): 1512-1521.

[14] Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, Sperti P, et al. Totallyrobotic Vs 3D laparoscopic colectomy: A singlecenters preliminary experience[J]. World journal ofgastroenterology, 2015, 21(46): 13152-13159.

[15] Casillas M A, Leichtle S W, Wahl W L, et al. Improvedperioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versusconventional laparoscopic colorectal operations[J].American journal of surgery, 2014, 208(1): 33-40.

[16] ZHOU B F. Predictive values of body mass index andwaist circumference for risk factors of certain relateddiseases in Chinese adults-study on optimal cut-offpoints of body mass index and waist circumferencein Chinese adults[J]. Biomedical and environmentalsciences: BES, 2002, 15(1): 83-96.

[17] Edge S B, Compton C C. The American Joint Committeeon Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer stagingmanual and the future of TNM[J]. Annals of surgicaloncology, 2010, 17(6): 1471-1474.

[18] MA S, CHEN Y, CHEN Y, et al. Short-term outcomesof robotic-assisted right colectomy compared withlaparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and metaanalysis[J]. Asian journal of surgery, 2019, 42(5): 589-598.

[19] De’Angelis N, Lizzi V, Azoulay D, et al. Robotic VersusLaparoscopic Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer:Analysis of the Initial Simultaneous Learning Curveof a Surgical Fellow[J]. Journal of laparoendoscopic &advanced surgical techniques Part A, 2016, 26(11):882-892.

[20] Deutsch G B, Sathyanarayana S A, Gunabushanam V,et al. Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: aninstitutional experience[J]. Surgical endoscopy, 2012,26(4): 956-963.

[21] LIU D, LI J, HE P, et al. Short- and long-termoutcomes of totally robotic versus robotic-assistedright hemicolectomy for colon cancer: A retrospectivestudy[J]. Medicine, 2019, 98(13): e15028.