探讨机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜技术在妇科手术加速康复中的作用。方法：回顾性分析陆军军医大学第一附属医院妇产科 2019 年 2 月 ~2019 年 9 月完成全面分期手术治疗的 29 例早期子宫内膜癌患者的临床资料。结果：在加速康复外科理念指导下，29 例患者均在完全腹腔镜下完成筋膜外全子宫切除 + 双侧附件切除 + Ⅱ级盆腔淋巴结切除术，其中机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜手术组 9 例，传统腹腔镜手术组 20 例。单孔机器人组年龄小于传统腹腔镜组、手术时间长于传统腹腔镜、术后疼痛评分小于传统腹腔镜组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；单孔机器人组的下床活动时间、引流管留置时间和术后住院时间均短于传统腹腔镜组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；两组在手术出血量、手术并发症（脏器、神经或血管损伤等）、术后肛门排气时间、尿管留置时间以及术后并发症（下肢静脉血栓、感染、肠梗阻等）方面比较，差异无统计学意义（p>0.05）。结论：机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜实施子宫内膜癌全面分期手术安全可行；该技术有助于促进妇科手术加速康复，缩短术后住院时间，促进医疗资源合理利用。

To explore the effect of robotic-laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecology. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical data of 29 patients with early endometrial cancer who completed comprehensive staging surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Military Medical University from February  2019 to September 2019. Results: Under the guidance of ERAS, 29 cases underwent complete laparoscopic total fascial hysterectomy + bilateral appendectomy + class Ⅱ pelvic lymphadenectomy, of which 9 patients were in the R-LESS group, the other 20 were in the traditional laparoscopic group. The R-LESS group is younger than the traditional laparoscope group (P<0.05), the operation time is longer than the traditional laparoscope group (P<0.05), and the postoperative pain score is lower than the traditional laparoscope group (P<0.05). The time of getting out of bed, drainage tube indwelling time and postoperative hospital stay in the R-LESS group were shorter than those in the traditional laparoscopic group (P<0.05); There were no differences in surgical bleeding, surgical complications (visceral、nerve or vascular injury, etc.), postoperative anal exhaust time, urinary indwelling time, and postoperative complications (lower limb venous thrombosis, infection, intestinal obstruction, etc.) between two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: R-LESS is safe and feasible for the comprehensive staging of endometrial cancer, it helps to accelerate recovery in gyecological operation, shorten the length of postoperative hospitalization and optimize medical resources.

收稿日期：2020-03-02 录用日期：2020-04-05

Received Date: 2020-03-02 Accepted Date: 2020-04-05

基金项目：陆军军医大学第一附属医院重大领域技术创新项目（SWH2016ZDCX3030）

Foundation Item: Major Technology Innovation project of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Military Medical University (SWH2016ZDCX3030)

通讯作者：陈诚，Email: chencheng961@126.com

Corresponding Author: CHEN Cheng, Email: chencheng961@126.com

引用格式：刘小艳，吴治敏，陈梦越，等. 机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜技术在妇科手术加速康复中的应用[J]. 机器人外科学杂志，2020, 1（1）：34-42.

Citation: LIU X Y, WU Z M, CHEN M Y, et al. Application of robotic-laparoendoscopic single-site in enhanced recovery after gynecological surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 1(1):34-42.

[1] Silva Filho A L D, Santiago A E, Derchain S F M, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): New Concepts in the Perioperative Management of Gynecologic Surgery[J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2018, 40(8):433-436. 

[2] Nelson G, Altman A D, Nick A, et al. Guidelines for pre-and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations[J]. Part I. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 140(2):313-322. 

[3] Nelson G, Altman A D, Nick A, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/ oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations-Part II[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 140(2):323-332. 

[4] 中华医学会妇产科学分会加速康复外科协作组 . 妇 科手术加速康复的中国专家共识 [J]. 中华妇产科杂 志 , 2019, 54(2):73-79. 

[5] Prodromidou A, Spartalis E, Tsourouflis G, et al. Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Robot Surg, 2020. DOI:10. 1007/s11701-020-01042-1. 

[6] Zhang Y, Kohn J R, Guan X. Single-Incision Hysterectomy Outcomes With and Without Robotic Assistance[J]. JSLS, 2019, 23(4). DOI:10. 4293/JSLS. 2019. 00046. 

[7] Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, et al. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery[J]. Clin Nutr, 2017, 36(3):623-650. 

[8] 中华医学会外科学分会 , 中华医学会麻醉学分会 . 加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南 (2018 版 )[J]. 中国实用外科杂志 , 2018, 38(1):1-20. 

[9] Bisch S P, Wells T, Gramlich L, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology: System-wide implementation and audit leads to improved value and patient outcomes[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2018, 151(1):117-123. 

[10] 吴治敏 , 薄海欣 , 王延洲 , 等 . 加速康复外科理念 在妇科围手术期护理干预中的应用价值 [J]. 中国妇 产科临床杂志 , 2018, 19(6):557-559. 

[11] 孔北华 . 重视加速康复外科理念在妇科围手术期 的应用 [J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志 , 2018, 19(6): 483- 484. 

[12] 关小明 , 张意茗 , 范晓东 . 单孔腹腔镜技术的发 展 及 展 望 [J]. 山 东 大 学 学 报（ 医 学 版）, 2019, 57(12):5-9. 

[13] Smith H J, Leath C A 3rd, Straughn J M Jr. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Surgical Specialties: Gynecologic Oncology[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2018, 98(6):1275-1285. 

[14] Amant F, Mirza M R, Koskas M, et al. Cancer of the corpus uteri[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2018, 143: 37-50. 

[15] Demirayak G, Comba C, Özdemir İ A, et al. Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Endometrial Cancer[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(5):776. 

[16] Zanagnolo V, Achilarre M T, Maruccio M, et al. Might robotic-assisted surgery become commonplace in endometrial cancer treatment? [J]. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2018, 18(6):507-509. 

[17] Korsholm M, Gyrd-Hansen D, Mogensen O, et al. Long term resource consequences of a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery for women with early stage endometrial cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 154(2):411-419. 

[18] Corrado G, Cutillo G, Mancini E, et al. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 27(4):e39. 

[19] Moukarzel L A, Sinno A K, Fader A N, et al. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24(6):977-983. 

[20] 郭楠 , 丁锦 , 倪观太 , 等 . 单孔腹腔镜技术在妇科 领域的应用探讨 [J]. 现代妇产科进展 , 2019, 28(6): 451-453. 

[21] Heathcote S Sr, Duggan K, Rosbrugh J, et al. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols Expanded over Multiple Service Lines Improves Patient Care and Hospital Cost[J]. Am Surg, 2019, 85(9):1044-1050. 

[22] 盛昕玫 , 赵卫东 , 陈曦曦 , 等 . 宫颈癌腹腔镜根治 术术中与术后并发症发生率及影响因素的对比研 究 [J]. 中国内镜杂志 , 2017, 23(1):20-24. 

[23] 郭瑞霞 , 杜建敏 , 王鹏冉 , 等 . Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌机器 人系统及传统腹腔镜手术并发症的比较及相关危 险因素分析 [J]. 中华妇产科杂志 , 2020, 55 (2): 112- 119. 

[24] 窦磊 , 芦恩婷 , 张颐 . 妇科机器人辅助腹腔镜手术 初期并发症发生原因研究 [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科 杂志 , 2017, 23(1): 20-24. 

[25] 吴治敏 , 王卉 , 李玲 , 等 . 单孔与传统腹腔镜下行 宫颈癌根治手术患者围手术期对比研究 [J]. 第三军 医大学学报 , 2018, 40(16):1507-1511. 

[26] 李博 , 倪莎 , 吴晓蕾 , 等 . 加速康复外科理念在妇 科围手术期的应用与价值 [J]. 中国妇产科临床杂 志 , 2018, 19(6):554-556. 

[27] Small Layne A1, Pinkard L, Shepherd J. Current trends in minilaparoscopy[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 28(4):255-260.