Esophageal cancer (EC) is among the most common malignances and one of the leading causes of cancerrelated death worldwide. Surgery plays a significant role in the multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer. Recent advances in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), including conventional thoracoscopic surgery and more recent robotic surgery, has been shown to improve short-term outcomes compared to open surgery. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was first performed in 2003 and has been increasingly utilized in tertiary medical centers. Compared to conventional video-assisted minimally esophagectomy (VAMIE), RAMIE provides certain advantages such as increased magnification, three-dimensional visual clarity and better lymphadenectomy, with superior short-term outcome and at least equivalent oncological results. This review focuses on the techniques, benefits and obstacles in applications of robotic esophagectomy for treating EC, meanwhile discussing the future of robotic esophageal surgery.
Received Date: 2020-04-03 Accepted Date: 2020-04-10
Foundation Item: National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871882), Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Outstanding Academic Leaders Training Program (2017BR055) and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission—Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant (20172005).
Corresponding Author: LI Hecheng, Email: lihecheng2000@hotmail.com
Citation: ZHANG J H, ZHANG Y J, LI H C, Applications and Prospects of Robotic Surgery in Esophageal Cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 1(1):50-56.
*These authors have contributed equally to this work.
[1] Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju T F, Al L F, et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2018, 4(11): 1553-1568.
[2] Hulscher J B, van Sandick J W, de Boer A G, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347(21): 1662- 1669.
[3] Low D E, Alderson D, Cecconello I, et al. International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) [J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262(2): 286-294.
[4] Biere S S, van Berge H M, Maas K W, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9829): 1887-1892.
[5] Briez N, Piessen G, Bonnetain F, et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial-the MIRO trial[J]. BMC Cancer, 2011, 11: 310.
[6] Sihag S, Wright C D, Wain J C, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, highvolume centre[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 42(3): 430-437.
[7] Mariette C, Markar S R, Dabakuyo-Yonli T S, et al. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(2): 152-162.
[8] Worrell S G, Bachman K C, Sarode A L, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with superior survival, lymphadenectomy and surgical margins: propensity matched analysis of the National Cancer Database[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2020, 1(1): 1-6.
[9] Kernstine K H, DeArmond D T, Karimi M, et al. The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004, 127(6): 1847-1849.
[10] van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma W A, et al. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(9): 1435-1439.
[11] Cuesta M A, Weijs T J, Bleys R L, et al. A new concept of the anatomy of the thoracic oesophagus: the mesooesophagus. Observational study during thoracoscopic esophagectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(9): 2576- 2582.
[12] Sarkaria I S, Rizk N P, Goldman D A, et al. Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019, 108(3): 920-928.
[13] Meredith K, Huston J, Andacoglu O, et al. Safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2018, 31(7): 1-7.
[14] Guerra F, Vegni A, Gia E, et al. Early experience with totally robotic esophagectomy for malignancy. Surgical and oncological outcomes[J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2018, 14(3): e1902.
[15] ZHANG H, CHEN L, WANG Z, et al. The Learning Curve for Robotic McKeown Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2018, 105(4): 1024-1030.
[16] Washington K, Watkins J R, Jay J, et al. Oncologic Resection in Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy[J]. JSLS, 2019, 23(2): 1-6.
[17] Wolff C S, Castillo S F, Larson D R, et al. Ivor Lewis approach is superior to transhiatal approach in retrieval of lymph nodes at esophagectomy[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2008, 21(4): 328-333.
[18] Lochowski M, Lochowska B, Kozak J. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy-influence on patient survival[J]. Prz Gastroenterol, 2017, 12(2): 118-121.
[19] Giugliano D N, Berger A C, Rosato E L, et al. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2016, 401(6): 747-756.
[20] Dunn D H, Johnson E M, Morphew J A, et al. Robotassisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year singlecenter experience[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2013, 26(2): 159- 166.
[21] van der Sluis P C, Ruurda J P, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial) [J]. Trials, 2012, 13: 230.
[22] van der Sluis P C, van der Horst S, May A M, et al. Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(4): 621-630.
[23] Yun J K, Chong B K, Kim H J, et al. Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2019, 1(1): 1-8.
[24] ZHANG Y, HAN Y, GAN Q, et al. Early Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019, 26(5): 1284-1291.
[25] Chao Y K, Wen Y W, Chuang W Y, et al. Transition from video-assisted thoracoscopic to robotic esophagectomy: a single surgeon’s experience[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2020, 33(2): 1-8.
[26] CHAO Y K, LI Z G, WEN Y W, et al. Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2019, 20(1): 346.
[27] Surgical-teams HCCV.
[C]. https://cmrsurgical.com/ versius/surgical-teams/.
[28] Van Boxel G I, Kingma B F, Voskens F J, et al. Roboticassisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: past, present and future[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2020, 12(2): 54-62.
[29] JIANG F, JIANG Y, ZHI H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future[J]. Stroke Vasc Neurol, 2017, 2(4): 230-243.
[30] Fujiwara H , Shiozaki A , Konishi H , et al. Transmediastinal approach for esophageal cancer: A new trend toward radical surgery[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2019, 12(1): 30-36.
[31] Chiu P, Ng S, Au S. Transcervical minimally invasive esophagectomy using da Vinci(R) SP Surgical System: a feasibility study in cadaveric model[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(5): 1683-1686.