中国的机器人外科学杂志 | ISSN 2096-7721 | CN 10-1650/R

机器人与胸腔镜在早期肺癌肺段切除术中短期疗效 的对比研究

Comparative study on short-term outcomes of robotassisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung segmentectomy

作者:王兵,刘露 ,杨宁 ,贺晓阳 ,崔百强,黄大新 ,白向豆, 曾伟强 ,苟云久

Vol. 2 No. 6 Dec. 2021 DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2021.06.006 发布日期:2022-08-06
关键词:肺癌;胸腔镜;手术机器人;肺段切除术;短期疗效

作者简介:

目的:分析机器人与胸腔镜手术在早期肺癌肺段切除中的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析 2019 年1 月 ~2020 年 12 月在甘肃省人民医院接受达芬奇机器人和胸腔镜行肺段切除手术的 106 例早期肺癌患者的临床资料。其中接受 RATS 肺段切除术 49 例(男 19 例,女 30 例),年龄(59.13±9.38)岁;接受 VATS 57 例(男 21 例,女36 例),年龄(60.36±10.06)岁,比较两组的临床疗效。结果:两组患者基线资料差异无统计学意义。RATS 组与VATS 组相比,手术时间(126.42min Vs 110.23min,P=0.007);术中失血量(40.46ml Vs 62.23ml,P=0.016);淋巴结清扫站数总数(6.32 Vs 5.21,P<0.001);淋巴结清扫总数(13.29 Vs 10.81,P=0.023);术后引流时间(4.29d Vs5.66d,P=0.005);总引流量(772.53ml Vs 995.34ml,P=0.011);术后第 1d 疼痛评分(1.67 Vs 2.59,P=0.031)、第 2d(2.74 Vs 3.71,P=0.025)、第 3d(1.02 Vs 1.92,P=0.006);术后住院时间(4.45d Vs 6.39d,P=0.008);住院费用(90 463.37 元 Vs 69 872.21 元,P<0.001),差异有统计学意义。而中转开胸手术、术后咳嗽、术后并发症、术后 30d 再入院率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:机器人手术系统在早期肺癌肺段切除术中,术中出血量少,住院时间短,淋巴结清扫优势大,术后疼痛感轻,操作安全有效且创伤小,可作为早期肺癌手术治疗的有效方法。

Objective: To compare the short-term clinical efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in segmental resection for early lung cancer. Methods: Clinical data of 106 patients with lung cancer who underwent RATS and VATS in Gansu Provincial Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. RATS group has 49 patients, including 19 males and 30 females, with a median age of (59.13±9.38) years. 57 patients in VATS group, including 21 males and 36 females, with a median age of (60.36±10.06) years. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results: No statistically significant difference in terms of baseline data between the two groups was found. Compared to the VATS group, the RATS group had a longer operative time (126.42min Vs 110.23min, P=0.007), less intraoperative blood loss (40.46 ml Vs 62.23 ml, P=0.016), more groups of lymph node dissection (6.32 Vs 5.21, P<0.001) and total number of lymph node dissection (13.29 Vs 10.81, P=0.023). The RATS group also had a shorter duration of chest drainage (4.29d Vs 5.66d, P=0.005) and less total thoracic drainage volume (772.53ml Vs 995.34ml, P=0.011). The postoperative pain scores 1 day after surgery of RATS group and VATS group were(1.67 Vs 2.59, P=0.031), 2 days after surgery were (2.74 Vs 3.71, P=0.025) and 3 days after surgery were (1.02 Vs 1.92, P=0.006) respectively. RATS group had a shorter postoperative hospitalization than VATS group (4.45 days Vs 6.39 days, P=0.008) but more hospital expenses (90 463.37 CNY Vs 69 872.21 CNY, P<0.001), the difference was statistically significant. However, there was no significant difference on conversion rate to thoracotomy, postoperative chronic cough, postoperative complications and readmission 30 days after surgery (P>0.05). Conclusion: Robotic surgery system has a lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, more lymph node dissection, less  postoperative pain and smaller incisions, it is safe and effective in the segmental resection for early stage of lung cancer .

稿件信息

收稿日期:2021-01-20  录用日期:2021-03-21

Received Date: 2021-01-20  Accepted Date: 2021-03-21

基金项目:甘肃省卫生行业科研计划项目(GSWSKY2020-50)

Foundation Item: Health Industry Scientific Research Project of GanSu Province (GSWSKY2020-50)

通讯作者:苟云久,Email:gouyunjiu@163.com

Corresponding Author: GOU Yunjiu, Email: gouyunjiu@163.com

引用格式:王兵,刘露,杨宁,等 . 机器人和胸腔镜在早期肺癌肺段切除术中短期疗效的对比研究 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2021,2(6):451-462.

Citation: WANG B, LIU L, YANG N, et al. Comparative study on short-term outcomes of robot-assisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung segmentectomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 2 (6): 451-462.

注:王兵,刘露为共同第一作者

Co-first author: WANG Bing, LIU Lu

参考文献

[1] Siegel R L, Miller K D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(1): 7-30.

[2] Aberle D R, Adams A M, Berg C D, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening [J]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 365(5): 395-409.

[3] Zhong C, Sakurai H, Wei S. Sublobar resections for small-sized stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma: a SinoJapanese multicenter study [J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(2): 991-998.

[4] DAndrilli A, Rendina E A. Should segmentectomy rather than lobectomy be the operation of choice for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer? Yes [J]. Chest, 2018, 153(3): 590-592.

[5] Bayman E O, Parekh K R, Keech J, et al. A prospective study of chronic pain after thoracic surgery [J]. Anesthesiology, 2017, 126(5): 938-951.

[6] Morice A H, Jakes A D, Faruqi S, et al. A worldwide survey of chronic cough: a manifestation of enhanced somatosensory response [J]. Eur Respir J, 2014; 44(5): 1149-1155.

[7] Cerfolio R J, Bass C S, Pask A H, et al. Predictors and treatment of persistent air leaks [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2002, 73(6): 1727-1730.

[8] Ghaly G, Kamel M, Nasar A, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a safe and effective alternative to thoracotomy for anatomical segmentectomy in patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 101(2): 465-472.

[9] ZHANG Y, CHEN C, HU J, et al. Early outcomes of robotic versus thoracoscopic segmentectomy for earlystage lung cancer: a multi-institutional propensity scorematched analysis [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 160(5): 1363-1372.

[10] Geraci T C, Ferrari-Light D, Kent A, et al. Technique, outcomes with navigational bronchoscopy using indocyanine green for robotic segmentectomy [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019, 108(2): 363-369.

[11] Krantz S B, Lutfi W, Kuchta K, et al. Improved lymph node staging in early-stage lung cancer in the National◆Cancer Database [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 104(6): 1805-1814.

[12] LIANG H, LIANG W, ZHAO L, et al. Robotic versus video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer: a meta-analysis [J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 268(2): 254-259.

[13] Wilson J L, Louie B E, Cerfolio R J, et al. The prevalence of nodal upstaging during robotic lung resection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(6): 1901-1907.

[14] Schuchert M J, Pettiford B L, Pennathur A, et al. Anatomic segmentectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open approach [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2009, 138(6): 1318-1325.

[15] Pardolesi A, Park B, Petrella F, et al. Robotic anatomic segmentectomy of the lung: Technical aspects and initial results [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2012, 94(3): 929-934.

[16] Mungo B, Hooker C M, Ho J S, et al. Robotic versus thoracoscopic resection for lung cancer: Early results of a new robotic program [J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2016, 26(4): 243-248.

[17] Li F, Li Z, Takahashi R, et al. Robotic extended re-thymectomy for refractory myasthenia gravis: a case series [J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019,144(S01)66.

[18] YANG S, GUO W, CHEN X, et al. Early outcomes of robotic versus uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a propensity score-matched study [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2018, 53(2): 348-352.

[19] TAO S L, LI Q Y, KANG P M, et al. Robtic versus thoracoscopic lung segmentectomy: a case control study [J]. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 36(09): 533- 538.

[20] CAO Y Q, ZHANG Y J, LI H C. Analysis of risk factors for complications after robot-assisted segmentectomy [J]. Chin J Clin Thorac Cardiov Surg, 2020, 27(11): 1281- 1286.

[21] Rinieri P, Peillon C, Salaün M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of video-and robot-assisted segmentectomies [J]. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, 2016, 24(2): 145- 151.

[22] Demir A, Ayalp K, Ozkan B, et al. Robotic and videoassisted thoracic surgery lung segmentectomy for malignant and benign lesions [J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 20(3): 304-309.

[23] LIU X C, XU S G, LIU B, et al. I stage non-small cell lung cancer with Da Vinci robot surgical curative effect analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer, 2018, 21(11):849-856.

[24] Le Gac C, Gondé H, Gillibert A, et al. Medico-economic impact of robot-assisted lung segmentectomy: what is the cost of the learning curve [J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2020, 30(2): 255-262.

[25] XIE B, SUN X, QIN Y, et al. Short-term outcomes of typical versus atypical lung segmentectomy by minimally invasive surgeries [J]. Thorac Cancer, 2019, 10(9): 1812-1818.

[26] Nakazawa S, Shimizu K, Mogi A, et al. VATS segmentectomy: Past, present, and future [J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 66(2): 81-90.

[27] Cerfolio R J, Watson C, Minnich D J, et al. One Hundred Planned Robotic Segmentectomies: Early Results, Technical Details, and Preferred Port Placement [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 101(3): 1089-1096.

印象笔记
有道云笔记
微博
QQ空间
微信
二维码
意见反馈