目的：探究机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜手术在泌尿外科手术中的应用进展。方法：检索 1985~2020 年科学引文索引扩展数据库 Web of Science 中所有关于泌尿外科与机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜技术的文献。运用文献计量方法与工具对检索结果行统计学分析，明确机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜技术在泌尿外科手术中的应用现状与进展。结果：本研究共纳入 119 篇文献，泌尿外科领域内年平均发文量为 7.24 篇，每篇平均被引频次为 28.43 次。Kaouk J H发文量最多（29篇），H 指数 20，为领域内核心作者；European Urology，Urology，BJU International 为领域内核心期刊；美国在泌尿外科与机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜技术领域处于国际领先水平，与国际合作密切。结论：医学科学研究的发展与技术革新密切系相关，有关机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜手术的长期随访数据或更大范围的随机前瞻性研究有待补充，但伴随技术的不断革新势必将继续推动泌尿外科手术向更微创、更精细的方向发展。

Objective: To investigate the application progress of robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology. Methods: Search the database Web of Science for all the literatures of 1985 to 2020 on urology and robot-assisted single port laparoscopic technology. Bibliometric analysis on searching results was performed to clarify the application status and progress of robot-assisted single port laparoscopic technology in urinary surgery. Results: A total of 119 literatures were included in the study. The average annual publication on urinary surgery was 7.24 with an average cited time of 28.43. Kaouk J H is the core author in the field, who published the most articles (29 articles) with an H index of 20. European Urology, Urology and BJU International are the core journals in urology field. United States has the highest international influence. Conclusion: Technological innovation contributes much to the development of medical science. Long-term follow-up data or larger randomized prospective studies on robot-assisted laparoscopic single-site surgery need to be supplemented. Urinary surgery will be more minimally invasive and precise with continuous technological development and innovation.

收稿日期：2021-02-07  录用日期：2021-06-02

Received Date: 2021-02-07  Accepted Date: 2021-06-02

基金项目：河南省自然科学基金项目（2018061）

Foundation Item: Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province(2018061)

通讯作者：顾朝辉，Email：zgwhgch@hotmail.com

Corresponding Author: GU Chaohui, Email: zgwhgch@hotmail.com

引用格式：樊瑞新，冯勇杰，陈龙，等 . 机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜手术在泌尿外科中的应用 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中英文），2021，2（6）：476-484.

Citation: FAN R X,  FENG Y J,  CHEN L,  et al. Application progress of robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery,  2021, 2(6): 476-484.

[1] Merseburger A S, Herrmann T R W, Shariat S F, et al. EAU guidelines on robotic and single-site surgery in urology[J]. Eur Urol, 2013, 64(2): 277-291.

[2] Gueli Alletti S, Vizzielli G, Lafuenti L, et al. Singleinstitution propensity-matched study to evaluate the psychological effect of minimally invasive interval debulking surgery versus standard laparotomic treatment: from body to mind and back[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(5): 816-822.

[3] Herron D M, Marohn M. A consensus document on robotic surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(2) : 313-325.

[4] Trinh Q D, Sammon J, Sun M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(4): 679-685.

[5] Raman J D, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, et al. Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy[J]. Urology, 2007, 70(6): 1039-1042.

[6] Nelson R J, Chavali J S S, Yerram N, et al. Current status of robotic single-port surgery[J]. Urol Annals, 2017, 9(3): 217-222.

[7] Narita M, Kageyama S, Okegawa T, et al. Urological laparoendoscopic single-site and reduced port surgery: a nationwide survey in Japan[J]. Int J Urol, 2018, 25(3): 263-268.

[8] PU Q H, LYU Q J, SU H Y. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015[J]. BMJ Open, 2016, 6(8): e011623.

[9] Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis[J]. J Informetr, 2017, 11(4): 959-975.

[10] Bornmann L, Daniel H D. The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?[J]. EMBO Rep, 2009, 10(1): 2-6.

[11] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572.

[12] Van Eck N J, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2): 523-538.

[13] Kaouk J H, Goel R K, Haber G P, et al. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report[J]. BJU Int, 2009, 103(3): 366-369.

[14] Autorino R, Kaouk J H, Stolzenburg J U, et al. Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review[J]. Eur Urol, 2013, 63(2): 266-280.

[15] Haber G P, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, et al. Robotic NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery) in reconstructive urology: initial laboratory experience[J]. Urology, 2008, 71(6): 996-1000.

[16] Shin T Y, Lim S K, Komninos C, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) reduces postoperative wound pain without a rise in complication rates[J]. BJU Int, 2014, 114(4): 555-561.

[17] White M A, Autorino R, Spana G, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: surgical technique and comparative outcomes[J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 59(5): 815-822.

[18] White M A, Haber G P, Autorino R, et al. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy: technique and early outcomes[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(4): 544-550.

[19] Konstantinidis K M, Hirides P, Hirides S, et al. Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site(®) robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases [J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(9): 2687-2694.

[20] SU W L, HUANG J W, WANG S N, et al. Comparison study of clinical outcomes between single-site robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Asian journal of surgery, 2017, 40(6): 424-428.

[21] Law J, Rowe N, Archambault J, et al. First canadian experience with robotic single-incision pyeloplasty: comparison with multi-incision technique[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2016, 10(3-4): 83-88.

[22] Olweny E O, Park S K, Tan Y K, et al. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(2): 410-414.

[23] Won Lee J, Arkoncel F R P, Rha K H, et al. Urologic robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using a homemade single-port device: a single-center experience of 68 cases[J]. Journal of endourology, 2011, 25(9): 1481-1485.

[24] Dobbs R W, Halgrimson W R, Talamini S, et al. Single-port robotic surgery: the next generation of minimally invasive urology[J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(4): 897-905.

[25] Kaouk J, Aminsharifi A, Sawczyn G, et al. Single-port robotic urological surgery using purpose-built singleport surgical system: single-institutional experience with the first 100 cases[J]. Urology, 2020, 140: 77-83.

[26] Kaouk J, Garisto J, Bertolo R. Different approaches to the prostate: the upcoming role of a purpose-built single-port robotic system[J]. Arab J Urol, 2018, 16(3): 302-306.

[27] Kaouk J, Garisto J, Bertolo R. Robotic urologic surgical interventions performed with the single port dedicated platform: first clinical investigation[J]. Eur Urol, 2019, 75(4): 684-691.

[28] Kaouk J H, Autorino R, Laydner H, et al. Robotic single-site kidney surgery: evaluation of secondgeneration instruments in a cadaver model[J]. Urology, 2012, 79(5): 975-979.

[29] 杨波 , 王辉清 , 肖亮 , 等 . 机器人单孔腹腔镜下行 猪肾部分切除术及肾盂输尿管成形术的初步尝试 [J]. 第二军医大学学报 , 2011, 32(4): 409-412.

[30] 马鑫 , 张旭 , 董隽 , 等 . 机器人辅助经脐单孔腹腔 镜肾囊肿去顶减压术 3 例报告 [J]. 微创泌尿外科 杂志 , 2014, 3(1): 8-11.