中国的机器人外科学杂志 | ISSN 2096-7721 | CN 10-1650/R

完全机器人手工缝合消化道重建技术在全胃切除术中的应用

Application of manual suturing to reconstruct digestive tract after robot-assisted total gastrectomy

作者:刘江,王刚 ,冯啸波,潘华峰,王海锋 ,江志伟

Vol. 2 No. 3 Jun. 2021 DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2021.03.001 发布日期:2022-08-06
关键词:机器人手术系统;腹腔镜;胃癌;胃切除术

作者简介:

目的:探讨完全达芬奇机器人手工缝合消化道重建技术在全胃切除术中应用的可行性和安全性。方法:回顾性分析 2015 年 7 月 ~2018 年 6 月东部战区总医院胃癌患者行全胃根治性切除术的临床资料。根据手术方式分为完全机器人全胃切除(Robot-assisted total gastrectomy,RATG)组、腹腔镜辅助全胃切除(Laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy,LATG)组。RATG 组行机器人镜下腔内手工缝合消化道重建,采用 Uncut Roux-en-Y 重建方案;LATG 组行体外吻合器消化道重建,采用传统 Roux-en-Y 重建方案。观察分析两组患者手术指标、术后康复指标、标本肿瘤学指标、经济学指标及术后并发症情况。结果:两组 100 例患者均顺利完成手术。RATG 组较 LATG 组腹部切口短 [(3.95±0.64)cm Vs (10.38±1.79)cm,P<0.001],术中出血量少 [(57.10±20.55)ml Vs(98.20±28.44)ml,P<0.001],但手术时间长 [(201.66±16.59)min Vs(156.14±16.69)min,P<0.001],消化道重建耗时长 [(56.70±8.78)min Vs (36.60±8.17)min,P<0.001],住院费用高 [(8.55±1.78)万元 Vs(6.39±0.86)万元,P<0.001]。RATG 组较LATG 组术后住院时间短 [(5.84±4.76)d Vs(6.98±4.31)d,P=0.213],但差异无统计学意义。两组患者在术后视觉疼痛评分(VAS)、术后 TNM 分期、淋巴结清扫数目、阳性淋巴数目、术后首次排气时间、首次下床活动时间、首次进食流质时间及术后并发症方面的差异均无统计学意(P>0.05)。结论:完全达芬奇机器人手工缝合消化道重建技术在全胃切除术中的应用是安全、可行的。

Objective: To explore the feasibility and safety of manual suturing to reconstruct digestive tract with Da Vinci robot after robot-assisted total gastrectomy. Methods: The clinical data of 100 patients with gastric cancer who underwent robot-assisted total gastrectomy at the General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command from July 2015 to June 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into robot-assisted total gastrectomy (RATG) group and laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) group. The RATG group was given manual suturing to reconstruct digestive tract with Da Vinci robot after robot-assisted total gastrectomy and the Uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The digestive tract reconstruction was performed to the LATG group with extracorporeal stapler under the traditional Roux-en-Y approach. The operation indexes, postoperative rehabilitation indexes, specimen oncology indexes, economic indicators and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed in the two groups. Results: All the operations were completed successfully. The abdominal incision in the RATG group was shorter than that in the LATG group [(3.95±0.64)cm Vs (10.38±1.79)cm, P<0.001]. The RATG group had less intraoperative blood loss [(57.10±20.55)ml Vs (98.20±28.44)ml, P<0.001], longer operation time [(201.66±16.59) min Vs (156.14±16.69) min, P<0.001] and digestive tract reconstruction time [(56.70±8.78)min Vs(36.60±8.17) min, P<0.001] than that in LATG group.The postoperative hospital stay of RATG group were shorter than the LATG group [(5.84±4.76)d Vs (6.98±4.31)d, P=0.213],which was not statistically significant. However, higher hospitalization costs was taken by the RATG group than the LATG group [(85.50±17.80) thousand CNY Vs (63.90±8.60) thousand CNY, P<0.001]. No statistically significant differences between the two groups on visual pain score (VAS), TNM stage, number of lymph nodes dissected, number of positive lymph nodes, time to first exhaust after surgery, time to first off-bed activity after surgery, time to first fluid intake and incidence of postoperative complications (P>0.05). Conclusion: Manual suturing to reconstruct digestive tract with Da Vinci robot after robot-assisted total gastrectomy is safe and feasible.

稿件信息

收稿日期:2020-11-18  录用日期:2021-02-27

Received Date: 2020-11-18  Accepted Date: 2021-02-27

基金项目:江苏省中医药管理局基金项目(JD201807);江苏省中医院基金项目(Y19007)

Foundation Item: Foundation of Jiangsu Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine(JD201807); Foundation of Jiangsu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Y19007)

通讯作者:江志伟,Email:surgery34@163.com

Corresponding Author: JIANG Zhiwei, Email: surgery34@163.com

引用格式:刘江,王刚,冯啸波,等 . 完全机器人手工缝合消化道重建技术在全胃切除术中的应用 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2021,2(3):151-161.

Citation: LIU J, WANG G, FENG X B, et al. Application of manual suturing to reconstruct digestive tract after robot-assisted total gastrectomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery,  2021, 2(3):151-161.

参考文献

[1]Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.

[2]国家卫生健康委员会 . 胃癌诊疗规范 (2018 年版 )[J].中华消化病与影像杂志 ( 电子版 ), 2019, 9(3): 118-144.

[3]YU J, HUANG C, SUN Y, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA, 2019, 321(20): 1983-1992.

[4]夏灿灿 , 刘江 , 赵健 , 等 . 加速康复外科胃癌患者术后不常规留置导尿管的可行性 [J]. 协和医学杂志 , 2020, 11(1): 49-53.

[5]Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition)[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2021, 24(1): 1-21.

[6]江志伟 , 周嘉晖 , 成汇 . 多模式镇痛在加速康复外科中的作用 [J]. 山东大学学报 ( 医学版 ), 2019,57(9): 1-4, 11.

[7]Alkatout I, Mettler L, Maass N, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecology[J]. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 2016, 17(4):224-232.

[8]Sood A, Jeong W, Peabody J O, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: inching toward gold standard[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2014, 41(4): 473-484.

[9] Doulamis I P, Spartalis E, Machairas N, et al. The role of robotics in cardiac surgery: a systematic review[J]. J Robot Surg, 2019, 13(1): 41-52.

[10] Caruso R, Vicente E, Núñez-Alfonsel J, et al. Robotic-assisted gastrectomy compared with open resection: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. J Robot Surg, 2020, 14(4):627-632.

[11] Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, et al. Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer enhanced surgical system[J].Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(8): 1187-1191.

[12] Junfeng Z, Yan S, Bo T, et al. Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of surgical performance and short-term outcomes[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(6): 1779-1787.

[13] 杨昆 , 陈心足 , 张维汉 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人在胃癌全胃切除脾门淋巴结清扫中的应用 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志 , 2016, 19(8): 898-901.

[14] 赵健 , 王刚 , 江志伟 . 机器人胃癌手术镜下吻合技术 [J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志 , 2017, 24(4): 410-411.

[15] 曾冬竹 , 余佩武 , 雷晓 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人手术系统在直肠癌根治术中的应用 [J]. 中华消化外科杂志 , 2011, 10(6): 436-438.

[16] Parisi A, Ricci F, Trastulli S, et al. Robotic Total Gastrectomy With Intracorporeal Robot-Sewn Anastomosis: A Novel Approach Adopting the Double-Loop Reconstruction Method[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),

2015, 94(49): e1922.

[17] ZHANG S, JIANG Z W, WANG G, et al. Robotic gastrectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction for female gastric cancer patients [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, 21(47): 13332-13338.

[18] 王林俊 , 徐皓 , 徐泽宽 . 全腹腔镜胃癌根治术消化道重建方法选择与评价 [J] . 中华胃肠外科杂志 ,2017, 20(10): 1113-1116.

[19] 杨闯 , 钱锦 , 汪洋 , 等 . 手工吻合在全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合中的应用 [J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志 , 2018, 21(9): 1068-1070.

印象笔记
有道云笔记
微博
QQ空间
微信
二维码
意见反馈