中国的机器人外科学杂志 | ISSN 2096-7721 | CN 10-1650/R

机器人辅助腹腔镜黏膜下隧道法输尿管再植术的临床疗效分析

Clinical efficacy analysis on robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral replantation with submucosal tunnel approach

作者:肖亮,陈鑫,冯旭辉,吴志强,宋迎春,张庆卫

Vol. 2 No. 1 Feb. 2021 DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2021.01.007 发布日期:2022-08-06
关键词:机器人辅助腹腔镜;输尿管膀胱再植术;先天性巨输尿管症

作者简介:

目的:介绍黏膜下隧道法机器人辅助腹腔镜治疗 1 例医源性输尿管下段狭窄患者和 1 例单侧重复肾重复巨输尿管合并肾积水患者的学习经验和手术疗效。方法:回顾性分析机器人辅助腹腔镜治疗 1 例膀胱肿瘤电切术后左侧输尿管下段狭窄、左肾积水,患者抗反流输尿管膀胱吻合采用黏膜下隧道包埋法;1 例(左侧)原发性梗阻重复肾重复巨输尿管症患者,首先分离巨输尿管前面和两侧面,保留输尿管和腹壁间系膜先不离断,测噩输尿管,剪裁,放入F7 双J 管,缝合成形后再离断系膜,采用黏膜下隧道包埋法与膀胱再吻合。结果:2 例患者手术均成功, 尤中转开放,手术时间分别为 165.8min、176.2min,其中机器人定位时间 30min;出血噩分别为 12.4ml、20.8ml;术后引流管拔除时间第 1 例 5d,第 2 例 6d,2 例患者均尤明显漏尿,术后尿管拔除时间为 14d。术后随访 6 个月,复查 CT 和彩超显示肾积水明显减轻,未见输尿管吻合口狭窄和输尿管反流。结论:机器人辅助腹腔镜黏膜下隧道法输尿管膀胱再植术治疗复杂的输尿管下段狭窄和复杂的巨输尿管症安全有效。

Objective: To introduce the learning experience and clinical efficacy of submucosal tunnel approach in robot- assisted laparoscopic ureteral replantation on treating 1 case of iatrogenic ureteral stenosis and 1 case of unilateral duplication of kidney and megaureter combined with hydronephrosis. Methods: The 2 patients all underwent the robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. 1 case of lower segment stenosis of left ureter with hydronephrosis after resection of bladder tumor and the anti-reflux ureter- bladder anastomosis was performed with submucosal tunnel approach by robot-assisted laparoscopy. The case of primary bladder neck obstruction with unilateral duplication of kidney and megaureter combined with hydronephrosis was given the separation of front and sides of megaureter first, the membrane between ureter and abdomen were preserved. To measure and cut out the ureter, then put it into F7 double J tube for suturing. The ureter-bladder anastomosis was performed with submucosal tunnel approach after suturing and cutting the membrane off. Results: The two operations were all successfully performed. The operation time of the two cases were 165.8 min and 176.2min respectively, including 30min of robot position adjusting. The operative blood loss was12.4ml and 20.8ml respectively. The postoperative retention time of drainage tube were respectively 5d and 6d. No obvious urine leakage was found after operation. The indwelling time of catheter was 14d for the 2 patients. The CT and color ultrasound indicates significant reduction of hydronephrosis after 6-month following up, no ureteral anastomotic stenosis or ureteral reflux were observed. Conclusion: Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral replantation with submucosal tunnel approach is safe and effective in treating complex megaureter and lower segment stenosis of ureter.

稿件信息

收 稿 日 期 :2020-04-09 录 用 日 期 :2020-10-12 

Received Date: 2020-04-09 Accepted Date: 2020-10-12 

通讯作者:陈鑫,Email wangyixinren1984@163.com

Corresponding Author: CHEN Xin, Email: wangyixinren1984@163.com

引用格式:肖亮,陈鑫,冯旭辉,等 . 机器人辅助腹腔镜黏膜下隧道法输尿管再植术的临床疗效分析 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志, 2021,2(1) 46-52.

Citation: XIAO L, CHEN X, FENG X H, et al. Clinical efficacy analysis on robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral replantation with submucosal tunnel approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 2(1): 46-52.

参考文献

[1]郭应禄 . 泌尿外科内镜诊断治疗学 [M]. 2 版 . 北京 : 北京大学医学出版社 , 2016: 4.

[2]符伟军 , 张旭 , 高江平 , 等 . 机器人辅助腹腔镜治疗巨输尿管症研究 [J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志 , 2013, 2(6): 360-362.

[3]Ansari M S, Mandhan A, Khuruna N, et al. Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with extracorporeal tailoring for megaureter: a simple technical nuance[J]. J Urol, 2006, 176(6 Pt 1): 2640-2642.

[4]曹正国 , 周林玉 , 吴斌 , 等 . 后腹腔镜手术治疗重复肾双输尿管畸形( 附13 例报告)[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2009, 15(4): 353-355.

[5]秦超 , 殷长军 , 居小兵 , 等 . 经膀胱内腹腔镜输尿管膀胱再植术 3 例报告 [J]. 南京医科大学学报 ( 自然医学版 ), 2010, 30(9): 1333-1334.

[6]HE R, YU W, LI X, et al. Laparoscopic ureteal reimpalntation with extracorporeal tailoring and direct nipple ureteroneocystostomy for adult obstructed megaurter: a novel technique[J]. Urology, 2013, 82(5): 1171-1174.

[7]Silay M S, Turan T, Kayali Y, et al. Comparision of intravesical(Cohen) and extravesical (Lich-Gregoir) ureteroneocystostomy in the treatment of unilateral primary vesicoureteric reflux in children[J]. J Pediar Urol, 2018, 14(1): 65.e1-65.e4.

[8]Mufarrij P W, Woods M, Shah O D, et al. Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience[J]. J Urol, 2008, 180(4): 1391-1396.

[9]Patil N N, Mottrie A, Sundaram B, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch: A multi-institutional, multinational evaluation[J]. Urology, 2008, 72(1): 47-50.

[10]Thiel D D, Badger W J, Winfield H N. Robot-asisted laparoscopic excision and stricture[J]. J Endourol, 2008, 22(12): 2667-2669.

[11]Much M, Hohenhorst L, Pailiart A, et al. Robot-asisted reconstructive surgery of the distal ureter: Single institution experience in 16 patients[J]. BJU Int, 2013, 111(5): 773-783.

[12]Schimf M O, Wagner J R. Robot-asisted laparoscopic distal ureteral surgery[J]. JSLS, 2009, 13(1): 44-49.

[13]Kurtz M P, Leow J J, Varda B K, et al. Robotic versus open pediatric ureteral reimplantation: costs and complications from a nationwide sample[J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2016, 12(6): 408.

[14]Isac W, Kaouk J, Alturende F, et al. Robot-assisted ureteroneocystostomy: technique and comparative outcomes[J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27(3): 318-323.

[15]Sakamoto W, Nakatani T, Sakakura T, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir antireflux plasty for primary vesicoureteral reflux[J]. Int J Urol, 2013, 10(2): 94-98.

印象笔记
有道云笔记
微博
QQ空间
微信
二维码
意见反馈