中国的机器人外科学杂志 | ISSN 2096-7721 | CN 10-1650/R

全机器人下前入路联合右后入路法行胰十二指肠切除术的安全性及有效性分析

Analysis on the safety and effectiveness of totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy under anterior approach combined with right posterior approach

作者:何兴龙 ,许永成,马雕龙,郭进,詹渭鹏,狐鸣,景武堂,张文涛,马云涛

Vol. 3 No. 6 Dec. 2022 DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2022.06.004 发布日期:2023-10-19
关键词:手术机器人;胰十二指肠切除术;联合入路;有效性;安全性

作者简介:

目的:探讨全机器人下前入路联合右后入路法行胰十二指肠切除术(Pancreaticoduodenectomy,PD)的 安全性及有效性分析。方法:回顾性分析甘肃省人民医院普外临床中心 2018—2020 年收治并行 PD 术式的 45 例患 者的临床资料,其中 39 例符合纳入标准,将其分为 LPD 组与 TRPD 组(两组患者皆行前入路与右后入路联合术式)。 观察联合入路在术中的应用,分析患者的 R0 切除率、手术时程、术中出血量、PV-SMV 血管轴解剖时间、钩突系 膜处理时间、消化道重建时间、术中副损伤、术后拔除胃管时间、首次进食时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症等。 采用 SPSS 25.0 统计学软件对所有数据进行分析。结果:两组患者均成功实施 PD,无中转开腹病例;术后病检结果 显示,胰腺癌 24 例、十二指肠乳头癌 7 例、胆管下段癌 5 例、壶腹癌 3 例。TRPD 组与 LPD 组术中及术后指标比较, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组淋巴结清扫数目相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者术后出现胃排空障 碍、胆瘘、胰瘘、术后出血、术后感染的发生率及总发生率相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后均无死亡病例。 结论:全机器人下前入路与右后入路联合进行胰十二指肠切除术安全、可行。

Objective: To explore the safety and effectiveness of totally robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy with anterior approach and right posterior approach. Methods: The clinical data of 45 patients underwent robotic PD surgery in Gansu Provincial Hospital from 2018 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. 39 cases of which were selected into the study and divided into LPD (Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy) group and TRPD (Totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy) group. Both the two groups of surgery were performed under anterior approach combined right posterior approach. The application of combined approaches was observed. R0 resection rate, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, PV-SMV vascular resection time, uncinate mesangial treatment time, digestive tract reconstruction time, intraoperative collateral injury, postoperative removal time of gastric tube, first meal time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications were collected and analyzed with SPSS 25.0 statistical software. Results: All surgeries were successfully completed without conversion to laparotomy. The postoperative pathological findings showed that there were 24 cases of pancreatic cancer, 7 cases of duodenal papillary cancer, 5 cases of lower bile duct cancer, and 3 cases of ampullary cancer. Intraoperative and postoperative indexes between the TRPD group and the LPD group were statistically different (P<0.05). No significant difference on the number of lymph node dissections between the two groups was found (P>0.05). The incidence and total incidence of gastric emptying disorders, biliary fistula occurred pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage and postoperative infection in the two groups after surgery were not statistically different (P>0.05). No death occurred after surgery. Conclusion: It is safe and feasible to perform totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy through the combination of anterior approach and right posterior approach.

稿件信息

收稿日期:2021-03-23  录用日期:2022-03-30

Received Date: 2021-03-23  Accepted Date: 2022-03-30 

基金项目:甘肃省外科肿瘤分子诊断与精准治疗重点实验室开放基金(2019GSZDSYS04)

Foundation Item: Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology in Gansu Province (2019GSZDSYS04)

通讯作者:马云涛,Email:3575515665@qq.com 

Corresponding Author: MA Yuntao, Email: 3575515665@qq.com 

引用格式:何兴龙,许永成,马雕龙,等 . 全机器人下前入路联合右后入路法行胰十二指肠切除术的安全性及有效性分析 [J]. 机器 人外科学杂志(中英文),2022,3(6):456-463.

Citation: HE X L, XU Y C, MA D L, et al. Analysis on the safety and effectiveness of totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy under anterior approach combined with right posterior approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 3 (6): 456-463.

参考文献

[1] 刘荣 , 张恭 . 达芬奇机器人胰十二指肠根治术的 现状与发展 [J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志 ( 电子版 ), 2020, 14(1): 1-4. 

[2] WANG M J, MENG L W, CAI Y Q, et al. Learning curve for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a CUSUM analysis[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3105-3.

[3] 梁贇 , 王巍 , 姜翀弋 , 等 . 动脉优先入路处理胰腺 钩突在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的应用 [J]. 中华 肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 , 2017, 6(1): 19-23.

[4] Wente M N, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(5): 761-768.

[5] Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition [J]. Surgery, 2005, 138(1): 8-13.

[6] 覃军 . 胰十二指肠切除术手术路径的研究进展综述 [J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志 , 2019, 6(20): 188-189. 

[7] 孙明生 . 钩突入路腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术 : 附 12 例报告 [J]. 中国普通外科杂志 , 2015, 24(9): 1227-1231. 

[8] 刘荣 . 机器人肝胆胰手术操作指南 [J]. 中华腔镜外 科杂志 ( 电子版 ), 2019, 12(1): 12-27.

[9] 周进学 , 展翔宇 , 李庆军 , 等 . 改良胰肠端侧吻合 在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用 [J]. 中华肝胆外科杂 志 , 2017, 23(8): 558-560. 

[10] Kim S, Yoon Y S, Han H S, et al. Evaluation of a single surgeon’s learning curve of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk-adjusted cumulative summation analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(6): 2870-2878.

[11] Vandeputte M, D’Hondt M, Willems E, et al. Stepwise implementation of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Case series of a single centre’s experience[J]. Int J Surg, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.037. 

[12] 洪德飞 . 常规开展腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的经 验和技术创新 [J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志 , 2017, 29(2): 89-92.

[13] Aiolfi A, Lombardo F, Bonitta G, et al. Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Updates Surg, 2021, 73(3): 909-922.

[14] CHENG J F, LI X M, WU X K, et al. Preliminary observation on the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy in the treatment of periampullary malignant tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of Surgery, 2020, 58(12): 918-923.

[15] Mazzola M, Giani A, Crippa J, et al. Totally laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2021, 47(3): 674-680.

印象笔记
有道云笔记
微博
QQ空间
微信
二维码
意见反馈