探讨机器人辅助腹腔镜下子宫内膜癌分期手术的学习曲线及临床疗效。方法：回顾性分析 2019 年 12 月—2020 年 12 月济宁医学院附属医院妇科由同一术者完成的机器人辅助腹腔镜下子宫内膜癌分期手术 40 例 患者的病例资料。使用累积和（Cumulative Sum，CUSUM）法分析学习曲线，并对不同阶段的手术时间、术中出血量、 淋巴结切除个数、术后住院时间、手术并发症发生率等指标进行比较。结果：CUSUM 学习曲线的最佳拟合方程为 y=32.330+25.063x-0.637x 2 -0.0000362x 3 ，该模型拟合优度 R2 =0.805，CUSUM 曲线在手术例数达 20 例时达峰值，以此 为界将学习曲线划分为两个阶段：积累阶段（A 阶段）和熟练阶段（B 阶段）。B 阶段手术时间、出血量、住院时 间均明显优于 A 阶段（P<0.05）。但 A、B 两阶段盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除数、手术并发症发生率比较，差异 无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：机器人辅助腹腔镜下子宫内膜癌分期手术是一种可选择的手术方式。实施机器人 辅助腹腔镜下子宫内膜癌分期手术的医生，累积手术例数为 20 例可熟练掌握这项技术。

Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy and learning curve of Da Vinci robotic surgical system in the treatment of endometrial cancer. Methods: Clinical data of 40 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer by the same team from December 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed．All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. The cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) was used to study the learning curve of Da Vinci robotic surgical system in treating endometrial cancer. The operating time, blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative hospital stay, incidence rate of postoperative complications were analysed. Results: The best fitted equation of CUSUM learning curve was y=32.330+25.063x-0.637x 2 -0.0000362x 3 , with goodness of fit R2 =0.805. The peak value of CUSUM curve was the 20th case, and the learning curve were divided into learning stage (stage A) and mastery stage(stage B) with the cut-off point of 20 cases. The operating time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay in stage B was significantly better than that in the stage A (P<0.05)．The two stages were similar in terms of the number of dissected pelvic and para-aortic lymph node and incidence rate of postoperative complications (P>0.05). Conclusion: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is an alternative surgical method for endometrial cancer. The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer is around 20 cases．

收稿日期：2021-06-10  录用日期：2022-04-17 

Received Date: 2021-06-10  Accepted Date: 2022-04-17

基金项目：济宁医学院教师科研扶持基金（JY2017FS004） 

Foundation Item: Faculty Research Supporting Fund of Jining Medical University(JY2017FS004)

通讯作者：杨林青，Email：linqingyang3034@163.com

Corresponding Author: YANG Linqing, Email: linqingyang3034@163.com

引用格式：张素伟，宫迎迎，王云飞，等 . 单中心单人机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫内膜癌分期手术学习曲线及临床分析 [J]. 机器人外科 学杂志（中英文），2022，3（6）：471-476. 

Citation: ZHANG S W, GONG Y Y, WANG Y F, et al. Clinical efficacy and learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer by the same surgeon: a single-center report[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 3(6): 471-476.

[1] 中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会 . 子宫内膜癌诊 断与治疗指南 ( 第四版 )[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂 志 , 2018, 34(8): 880-886. 

[2] Amant F, Mirza M R, Koskas M, et al. Cancer of the corpus uteri[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2015, 131(Suppl 2): S96-104.

[3] 吕小慧 , 陈必良 . 达芬奇机器人手术系统在妇科 手术中的应用 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中英文）, 2020, 1(1): 57-60. 

[4] Gallioli A, Territo A, Boissier R, et al. Learning curve in robot-assisted kidney transplantation: results from the european robotic urological society working group[J]. Eur Urol, 2020, 78(2): 239-247.

[5] Broering D C, Berardi G, El Sheikh Y, et al. Learning curve under proctorship of pure laparoscopic living donor left lateral sectionectomy for pediatric transplantation[J]. Ann Surg, 2020, 271(3): 542-548. 

[6] 秦倩 , 时飞宇 , 孙祺 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人手术系统 辅助胃癌根治术的学习曲线 [J].中华消化外科杂志 , 2019, 18(5): 459-465.

[7] Yoshida H, Yamamoto M, Shigeta H. Learning curve of laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma: a cumulative sum analysis[J]. Surg Oncol, 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.09.008. 

[8] 王靖 , 姜蕾 , 郭天康 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人、腹腔镜 及开腹子宫内膜癌全面分期手术的比较 [J]. 中国微 创外科杂志 , 2018, 18(11): 974-977. 

[9] Frost J A, Webster K E, Bryant A, et al. Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 10(10): CD007585. 

[10] 蓝建发 , 林典超 , 许雅云 , 等 . 腹腔镜下腹膜外高 位腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术临床价值研究 [J]. 中国 实用妇科与产科杂志 , 2019, 35(12): 1379-1383.

[11] Da Costa A G, Borghesi Y, Hudry D, et al. Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopy[J]. Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(5): 861-866. 

[12] 李培全 , 刘青 , 刘开江 , 等 . 妇科恶性肿瘤腹腔镜 淋巴结清扫术后淋巴漏的影响因素及治疗方法 [J]. 中国内镜杂志 , 2018, 24(12): 43-49.

[13] 陈雨柔 . 妇科恶性肿瘤腹腔镜下腹膜外腹主动脉 旁淋巴结切除术的意义探讨 [J]. 现代妇产科进展 , 2017, 26(8): 624-626. 

[14] Kong T W, Chang S J, Kim J, et al. Risk factor analysis for massive lymphatic ascites after laparoscopic retroperitonal lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers and treatment using intranodal lymphangiography with glue embolization[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 27(4): e44.

[15] 方梓羽 , 曾定元 . 腹腔镜子宫内膜癌全面分期手 术 的 学 习 曲 线 分 析 [J]. 广 东 医 学 , 2013, 34(13): 2076-2078.