中国的机器人外科学杂志 | ISSN 2096-7721 | CN 10-1650/R

机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术联合新辅助内分泌治疗高危前列腺癌的临床研究

Clinical study of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined with neoadjuvant hormone therapy in treating high-risk prostate cancer

作者:靳通通,吕海迪,张晓峰,郭柏鸿,郗新生,周逢海

Vol. 3 No. 3 Jun. 2022 DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2022.03.004 发布日期:2023-10-19
关键词:手术机器人;前列腺癌根治术;新辅助内分泌治疗;高危前列腺癌;腹腔镜手术

作者简介:

探讨术前机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy,RALP)联合新辅助内分泌治疗(Neoadjuvant hormone therapy,NHT)治疗高危前列腺癌患者的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析甘肃省人民医院泌尿外科自2018年6月-2020年12月前通过PSA、穿刺活检及MRI确诊的35例高危前列腺癌患者临床资料,其中术前行RALP+NHT治疗组25例,年龄为56~81(70.28±7.07)岁;RALP治疗组10例,年龄为49~86(69.20±8.77)岁。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后切缘阳性率及术中和术后并发症等情况。结果:所有患者手术均获成功,无中转开放及二次手术。与RALP治疗组相比,RALP+NHT治疗组在手术时间[237.88±68.99d Vs (277±76.69)d,P=0.541]、术中出血量[(149.60±149.84)ml Vs (225±268.56)ml,P=0.266]、术后住院时间[(11±4.31) d Vs(11.7±4.86) d,P=0.402]、术后留置尿管时间[(28±6.81) d Vs (28±6.81) d,P=0.464]和术前PSA值[(49.97±32.22)ng/ml Vs (47.41±23.14)ng/ml,P=0.089]等方面差异均无统计学意义;RALP+NHT治疗组在总住院时间[(18.08±4.44)d Vs (25.5±10.82)d,P<0.005]和术后留置引流管时间[(10.12±3.36)d Vs(11.10±5.17)d,P=0.014]明显低于RALP组,差异具有统计学意义;RALP+NHT治疗组在Gleason评分(24% Vs 10%)、肿瘤切缘阳性(12% Vs 20%)及并发症(4% Vs 10%)等方面下降明显。结论:术前RALP联合NHT可降低高危前列腺癌切缘阳性、改善病理分级,使高危患者受益。

To investigate the clinical benefits of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) combined with neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. Methods: Retrospective study was conducted on 35 high-risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed by PSA, needle biopsy and MRI in the Department of Urology of Gansu Provincial People’s Hospital from June 2018 to December 2020. Among them, 25 patients [56 to 81 (70.28±7.07) years old] were treated with NHT before operation, and 10 patients [49 to 86 (69.20±8.77) years old] were treated with no NHT. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative margin positive rate, positive rate of surgical margins, intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: All surgeries were successfully completed. No conversion to open surgery or secondary surgery occurred. Differences between RALP group and RALP+NHT group on operation time [(237.88±68.99) min Vs (277±76.69) min, P=0.541], intraoperative blood loss [(149.60±149.84)ml Vs (225±268.56)ml, P=0.266], postoperative hospital stay [(11±4.31)d Vs (11.7±4.86)d, P=0.402], postoperative indwelling catheter time [(28±6.81)d Vs (28±6.81)d, P=0.464], and the preoperative PSA value [(49.97±32.22)ng/ml Vs

(49.97±32.22) ng/ml, P=0.464] were not statistically significant. The total length of stay[ (18.08±4.44)d Vs (25.5±10.82)d,

P<0.005] and postoperative indwelling time of drainage tube [ (10.12±3.36)d Vs (11.10±5.17)d, P=0.014) were significantly lower than that in the RALP group. Gleason score (24% Vs 10%), positive rate of surgical margins (12% Vs 20%) and complications (4% Vs 10%) were significantly lower than that in the RALP group. Conclusion: Preoperative RALP combined with NHT could reduce the positive margin of high-risk prostate cancer and improve the pathological grading to benefit high-risk patients.

稿件信息

收稿日期:2021-03-18 录用日期:2021-08-31

Received Date: 2021-03-18 Accepted Date: 2021-08-31

基金项目:兰州市人才创新创业项目(2015-RC-16)

Foundation Item: Lanzhou Talent Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project (2015-RC-16)

通讯作者:周逢海,Email:Zhoufengh@163.com

Corresponding Author: ZHOU Fenghai, Email: Zhoufengh@163.com

引用格式:靳通通,吕海迪,张晓峰,等. 机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术联合新辅助内分泌治疗高危前列腺癌的临床研究[J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2022,3(3):188-193.

Citation: JIN T T, LYU H D, ZHANG X F, et al. Clinical study of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined with neoadjuvant hormone therapy in treating high-risk prostate cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 3(3): 188-193.

注:靳通通,吕海迪为共同第一作者

Co-first Author:JIN Tongtong,LYU Haidi

参考文献

[1] Siegel R L, Miller K D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(1): 7-30.

[2] 韩苏军, 张思维, 陈万青, 等. 中国前列腺癌发病现状和流行趋势分析[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2013,18(4): 330-334.

[3] Chen W, Zheng R, Baade P D, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.

[4] Rippentrop J M, Joslyn S A, Konety B R. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: evaluation of data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program[J]. Cancer, 2004, 101(6): 1357-1363.

[5] Albertsen P C. The face of high risk prostate cancer[J]. World J Urol, 2008, 26(3): 205-210.

[6] 王大明, 谢栋栋, 于德新, 等. 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术联合辅助疗法治疗高危前列腺癌的早期效果分析[J]. 中国男科学杂志, 2020, 34(4): 32-36, 41.

[7] 袁令兴, 娄庆艳, 徐英民, 等. 新辅助内分泌治疗联合腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗高危及局部晚期前列腺癌的临床研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2019,

34(10): 801-803, 808.

[8] 朱再生, 叶敏, 施红旗, 等. 前列腺癌淋巴结转移的特点及其临床意义[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2014,35(11): 829-832.

[9] PANG C, GUAN Y, LI H, et al. Urologic cancer in China[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2016, 46(6): 497-501.

[10] Chang A J, Autio K A, Roach M 3rd, et al. High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2014, 11(6): 308-323.

[11] Cha E K, Eastham J A. Chemotherapy and novel therapeutics before radical prostatectomy for high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer[J]. Urol Oncol, 2015,33(5): 217-225.

[12] 卢慕峻, 张克, 张明, 等. 高危及局部晚期前列腺癌新辅助治疗后行腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术的临床体会[J]. 中华临床医师杂志( 电子版), 2015, 9(2):

196-199.

[13] Tosco L, Laenen A, Briganti A, et al. The survival impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy for treatment of high-risk prostate cancer[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2017, 20(4):407-412.

[14] Gleave M E, Goldenberg S L, Chin J L, et al. Randomized comparative study of 3 versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before   radical prostatectomy: biochemical and pathological effects[J]. J Urol, 2001, 166(2): 500-506.

[15] Yee D S, Lowrance W T, Eastham J A, et al. Long-term follow-up of 3-month neoadjuvant hormone therapy before radical prostatectomy in a randomized trial[J]. BJU Int, 2010, 105(2): 185-190.

[16] Mostaghel E A, Page S T, Lin D W, et al. Intraprostatic androgens and androgen-regulated gene expression persist after testosterone suppression: therapeutic implications for castration-resistant prostate cancer[J]. Cancer Res, 2007, 15, 67(10): 5033-5041.

[17] 陈卓康, 刘春晓. 高危前列腺癌新辅助治疗配合手术的研究进展[J]. 广东医学, 2019, 40(5): 609-613.

[18] Brown J A, Garlitz C, Strup S E, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: an apparently safe and effective procedure[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2004, 14(6): 335-338.

[19] 周利群, 姚鲲, 蔡林, 等. 新辅助内分泌治疗对临床局限性前列腺癌手术病理和生化复发的影响[J].中华泌尿外科杂志, 2009, 30(11): 765-768.

印象笔记
有道云笔记
微博
QQ空间
微信
二维码
意见反馈