宫颈癌是妇科最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。内镜技术的发展，尤其是达芬奇机器人手术系统的推广，推 动了宫颈癌微创手术的迅速开展。2018 年两项高级别证据研究提示微创手术导致宫颈癌手术不良的肿瘤结局，这在 妇科肿瘤界尤其是在中国妇科肿瘤界引发了激烈的争论，无瘤术由此成为研究的焦点。本文结合国内外文献及笔者 经验，总结了机器人宫颈癌根治术中贯穿始终的无瘤术相关内容，为微创手术在宫颈癌中合理的应用和改良手术方 法提供了方向。

Cervical cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. The development of endoscopic technology, especially the promotion of Da Vinci robotic surgical system, promoting the rapid development of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer. In 2018, two important studies published and suggested that the disease free survival (DFS) and Overall survival (OS) of cervical cancer became worse since the minimally invasive surgery applied, which has triggered a fervent discussion in the gynecological oncology community, especially in China, and the tumor-free operation has become the research hotspot. Combined with domestic and foreign literatures and the author’s experience, relevant points of tumor-free principles in robot-assisted radical hysterectomy of cervical cancer were summarized in this paper, aiming to provide references for the correct application and improvement of minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer.

收稿日期：2022-05-05  录用日期：2022-12-05 

Received Date: 2022-05-05  Accepted Date: 2022-12-05 

基金项目：国家卫生健康委医药卫生科技发展研究中心（HDSL202003005）；中国医科大学 2019 年度“培育学科支持计划”项 目（111-3110119069） 

Foundation Item: Development Center for Medical Science& Technology of National Health Commission of China (HDSL202003005) ; Cultivating Discipline Support Program of China Medical University in 2019(111-3110119069) 

通讯作者：张颐，E-mail：syzi@163.com 

Corresponding Author: ZHANG Yi, E-mail: syzi@163.com 

引用格式：李芳梅，张颐 . 达芬奇机器人辅助宫颈癌根治术中无瘤原则的思考 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中英文），2023，4（5）： 464-470. 

Citation: LI F M, ZHANG Y. Tumor-free principles in Da Vinci robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer [J].Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 4(5): 464-470.

[1] ZHENG R S, ZHANG S W, ZENG H M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2016[J]. JNCC, 2022, 2(1): 1-9. 

[2] Ramirez P T, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018 , 379(20): 1895- 1904. 

[3] Melamed A, Margul D J, Chen L, et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(20): 1905- 1914. 

[4] Abu-Rustum N R, Yashar C M, Bean S, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: Cervical cancer, version 1.2020 [J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2020, 18(6): 660-666. 

[5] 陈春林 , 刘萍 , 郎景和 . 中国子宫颈癌临床诊疗 大数据研究项目第一期总结——腹腔镜与开腹手 术肿瘤学结局对比 [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志 , 2020, 36(1): 80-85. 

[6] 陈春林 , 王莉 , 范辉健 , 等 . 基于真实世界大数据 IA1(LVSI+)~IB1 期子宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹手术长 期肿瘤学结局研究 [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志 , 2020, 36(7): 637-645. 

[7] Shazly S A, Murad M H, Dowdy S C, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015 , 138(2): 457-471. 

[8] ZHANG X R, LI Z Q, SUN L X, et al. Cohort Profile: Chinese cervical cancer clinical study[J]. Frontiers in Oncology, 2021, 11: 690275. DOI: 10.3389/ fonc.2021.690275.

[9] Toptas T, Uysel A , Ureyen I , et al. Robotic Compartment-based radical surgery in early-stage cervical cancer[J]. Case Reports in Surgery, 2016. DOI: 10.1155/2016/4616343 

[10] Höckel M. Morphogenetic fields of embryonic development in locoregional cancer spread[J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2015, 16(3): 148-151. 

[11] Höckel M , Wolf B , Schmidt K , et al. Surgical resection based on ontogenetic cancer field theory for cervical cancer: mature results from a single-centre, prospective, observational, cohort study[J]. The Lancet Oncology, 2019, 20(9): 1316-1326. 

[12] Buderath P, Stukan M, Ruhwedel W, et al. Total mesometrial resection (TMMR) for cervical cancer FIGO IB-IIA: first results from the multicentric TMMR register study[J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2022 , 33(1): e9. [13] Vizzielli G, Lucidi A, Gallotta V, et al. Robotic total mesometrial resection versus laparoscopic total mesometrial resection in early cervical cancer: a case-control study[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2016, 23(5): 804-809. 

[14] 陈春林 , 郎景和 , 向阳 , 等 . 子宫颈癌腹腔镜手术治 疗的中国专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(9): 7. 

[15] Rakowski J , Radi M , Ahmad S , et al. Does a uterine manipulator affect cervical cancer pathology or identification of lymphovascular space involvement?[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno. 2010.12.067. 

[16] LIU Y X, HUANG S Y, MING X, et al. Surgical approach and use of uterine manipulator are not associated with LVSI in surgery for early-stage cervical cancer[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2021, 28(9): 1573-1578. 

[17] Nica A, Kim S R, Gien L T , et al. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the uterine manipulator to blame?[J].Gynecologic Oncology, 2020, 30(12): 1864-1870. 

[18] Rakowski J A, Tran T A N, Ahmad S, et al. Does a uterine manipulator affect cervical cancer pathology or identification of lymphovascular space involvement?[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2012, 127( 1): 98-101. 

[19] Krizova A, Clarke B A, Bernardini M Q, et al. Histologic artifacts in abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy specimens: a blinded, retrospective review.[J]. American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2011, 35(1): 115-126. 

[20] Puntambekar S P, Patil A M, Rayate N V, et al. A novel technique of uterine manipulation in laparoscopic pelvic oncosurgical procedures: “the uterine hitch technique”[J]. Minim Invasive Surg, 2010: 836027. DOI: 10.1155/2010/836027. 

[21] 符淳 , 李光仪 , 张四友 , 等 . CO2 气腹下子宫恶性肿 瘤腹腔镜手术对腹膜微环境的改变和意义 [J]. 现代 妇产科进展 , 2007, 16(2): 5. 

[22] LV H T, ZHOU T, RONG F N. Proteomic analysis of the influence of CO2 pneumoperitoneum in cervical cancer cells[J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2021 , 17(5): 1253-1260. 

[23] LIN F, PAN L, LI L, et al. Effects of a simulated CO2 pneumoperitoneum environment on the proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis of cervical cancer cells in vitro[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2014, 20: 2497-2503. 

[24] Kong T W, Chang S J, Piao X, et al. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2016 , 42(1): 77-86. 

[25] WANG X J, LI J W, HUA K Q, et al. Vaginalassisted gasless laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: a retrospective pilot study[J] World J Surg Oncol, 2021 , 19(1): 288. [26] Kohler C, Hertel H, Herrmann J, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff-a multicenter analysis[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2019, 29(5): 845-850. 

[27] Deura I, Kanamori R, Nagasawa Y, et al. A simple technique of vaginal cuff closure to prevent tumor cell spillage in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2021 , 14(3): 665-668. 

[28] Lago V, Tiermes M, Padilla-Iserte P, et al. Protective maneuver to avoid tumor spillage during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: vaginal cuff closure[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021 , 28(2): 174-175. [29] Boyraz G, Karalok A, Basaran D, et al. Vaginal closure with endogia to prevent tumor spillage in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2019 , 26(4): 602. 

[30] JING H N , RAN X T , LI Z Y . Application of novel tumor-free techniques in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer[J]. Asian J Surg, 2021, 44(8): 1069-1072. 

[31] Zanagnolo V, Baroni C, Achilarre M T, et al. Oncologic outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy (rrh) for patients with early-stage cervical cancer: experience at a referral cancer center[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021 , 28(3): 1819-1829. 

[32] Kim S, Min K J, Lee S, et al. Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer[J]. Asian J Surg, 2021 , 44(1): 174-180.