随着社会认知和科技水平的提高，患者对微创手术的需求与日俱增。如何在治疗的同时尽可能地保 护 / 保留患者的生理结构和功能成为妇产科医生需要思考的问题。机器人手术系统的诞生使外科手术模式发生了革 命性的变化，机器人手术与传统的妇科开腹手术或腹腔镜手术相比具有显著的优势，特别是在深窄或更宽阔的空间 中能精确地完成高难度动作，在高清晰的 3D 视野下可以精确地进行解剖，并且可以克服手术医生的生理局限，给 患者带来高质量的诊断和治疗，为患者带来显著的临床收益。本文将对机器人手术在妇产科中的应用和未来做一综 述，为该手术在临床中的进一步应用提供参考依据。

With the rapid development of social cognition and scientific technology, patients’ desire for minimally invasive surgery is increasing. At the same time, how to protect or preserve the physiological structure and function of organs as much as possible during surgeries has become a problem that needs to be solved seriously by gynecologists. Robotic surgical system has revolutionized the surgical mode. Compared with traditional laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery has significant advantages, especially accurately performing difficult movements and dissection in the deep and narrow space with high-definition 3D vision. It could also overcome physiological limitations of surgeons and bring significant clinical benefits to patients. This article aims to review the current and future application of robotic surgery in gynecology and obstetrics.

收稿日期：2021-06-15  录用日期：2021-09-17

Received Date: 2021-06-15  Accepted Date: 2021-09-17 

基金项目：陕西省重点研发计划项目（2018SF-213） 

Foundation Item: Key Research and Development Project of Shaanxi Province (2018SF-213) 

通讯作者：薛翔，Email：xgxue@263.net

Corresponding Author: XUE Xiang, Email: xgxue@263.net

引用格式：赵金燕，公丕军，白莉，等 . 机器人手术在妇产科的应用现状及未来 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中英文），2023，4（1）： 1-11.

Citation: ZHAO J Y, GONG P J, BAI L, et al. Current status and prospect of robotic surgery in gynecology and obstetrics [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 4(1): 1-11.

[1] Brodie A, Vasdev N. The future of robotic surgery[J]. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2018, 100(Suppl 7): 4-13.

[2] Lauterbach R, Matanes E, Lowenstein L. Review of robotic surgery in gynecology-the future is here[J]. Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal, 2017, 8(2): e0019. 

[3] Damle A, Damle R N, Flahive J M, et al. Diffusion of technology: trends in robotic-assisted colorectal surgery[J]. American Journal of Surgery, 2017, 214(5): 820-824. 

[4] Moon A S, Garofalo J, Koirala P, et al. Robotic Surgery in Gynecology[J]. The Surgical Clinics of North America, 2020, 100(2): 445-460.

[5] Kwoh Y S, Hou J, Jonckheere E A, et al. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1988, 35(2): 153-160. 

[6] Falcone T, Goldberg J M, Margossian H, et al. Roboticassisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study[J]. Fertility and Sterility, 2000, 73(5): 1040-1042.

[7] Morrell A L G, Morrell-Junior A C, Morrell A G, et al. The history of robotic surgery and its evolution: when illusion becomes reality[J]. Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes, 2021. DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e- 20202798.

[8] Albright B B, Witte T, Tofte A N, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2016, 23(1): 18-27.

[9] Chen Y C, Lin H H, Hsiao S M. Comparison of robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed sutures and traditional laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed sutures[J]. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 57(5): 709-712.

[10] Dubinskaya A, Hernandez-Aranda D, Wakefield D B, et al. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy[J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2020, 31(2): 401-407.

[11] Ghomi A, Nolan W, Rodgers B. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: single institution analysis[J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery: MRCAS, 2020, 16(6): 1-5. 

[12] Restaino S, Mereu L, Finelli A, et al. Robotic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery in patients with diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 14(5): 687-694.

[13] Iavazzo C, Minis E E, Gkegkes I D. Robotic assisted laparoscopic cerclage: a systematic review[J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery: MRCAS, 2019, 15(1): e1966.

[14] Bogliolo S, Ferrero S, Cassani C, et al. Single-site versus multiport robotic hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: a retrospective evaluation of surgical outcomes and cost analysis[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2016, 23(4): 603-609.

[15] Aarts J W, Nieboer T E, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease[J]. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015, 2015(8): CD003677. 

[16] Truong M, Kim J H, Scheib S, et al. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery[J]. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 28(4): 304-310. 

[17] Lawrie T A, Liu H, Lu D, et al. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology[J]. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019, 4(4): CD011422. 

[18] Jayakumaran J, Patel S D, Gangrade B K, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review[J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2017, 11(2): 97-109.

[19] Lim C S, Griffith K C, Travieso J, et al. To robot or not to robot: the use of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery[J]. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020, 63(2): 327-336.

[20] Nezhat F R, Sirota I. Perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis[J]. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 2014, 18(4): e2014.00094.

[21] Daraï E, Dechaud H, Benifla J L, et al. Fertility after laparoscopic myomectomy: preliminary results[J]. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 1997, 12(9): 1931-1934. 

[22] Magrina J F, Espada M, Kho R M, et al. Surgical excision of advanced endometriosis: perioperative outcomes and impacting factors[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2015, 22(6): 944-950.

[23] Dulemba J F, Pelzel C, Hubert H B. Retrospective analysis of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopy in the treatment of pelvic pain indicative of endometriosis[J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7(2): 163-169.

[24] Collinet P, Leguevaque P, Neme R M, et al. Robotassisted laparoscopy for deep infiltrating endometriosis: international multicentric retrospective study[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28(8): 2474-2479. 

[25] Brudie L A, Gaia G, Ahmad S, et al. Peri-operative outcomes of patients with stage IV endometriosis undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery[J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2012, 6(4): 317-322.

[26] Morelli L, Perutelli A, Palmeri M, et al. Robot-assisted surgery for the radical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement: shortand mid-term surgical and functional outcomes[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2016, 31(3): 643-652.

[27] Giannini A, Russo E, Malacarne E, et al. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction[J]. Minerva Ginecologica, 2019, 71(1): 4-17. 

[28] Piedimonte S, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Gotlieb W, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a population-based study of adoption and immediate postoperative outcomes in the united states[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2019, 26(3): 551-557.

[29] Lowe M P, Chamberlain D H, Kamelle S A, et al. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2009, 113(2): 191-194. 

[30] Cantrell L A, Mendivil A, Gehrig P A, et al. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2010, 117(2): 260-265.

[31] Shah C A, Beck T, Liao J B, et al. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer[J]. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2017, 28(6): e82.

[32] Melamed A, Margul D J, Chen L, et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for earlystage cervical cancer[J]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2018, 379(20): 1905-1914.

[33] Ramirez P T, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer[J]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2018, 379(20): 1895-1904. 

[34] Uppal S, Gehrig P A, Peng K, et al. Recurrence rates in patients with cervical cancer treated with abdominal versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective review study[J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 38(10): 1030-1040. 

[35] Tewari K S. Minimally invasive surgery for earlystage cervical carcinoma: interpreting the laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer trial results[J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019, 37(33): 3075-3080. 

[36] Walker J L, Piedmonte M R, Spirtos N M, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2[J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009, 27(32): 5331-5336. 

[37] Janda M, Gebski V, Davies L C, et al. Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2017, 317(12): 1224-1233.

[38] Chan J K, Gardner A B, Taylor K, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients-a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2015, 139(2): 300-305.

[39] Aloisi A, Tseng J H, Sandadi S, et al. Is robotic-assisted surgery safe in the elderly population? An analysis of gynecologic procedures in patients≥  65 years old[J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26(1): 244-251.

[40] Ran L, Jin J, Xu Y, et al. Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(9): e108361. 

[41] Jørgensen S L, Mogensen O, Wu C, et al. Nationwide introduction of minimally invasive robotic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer and its association with severe complications[J]. JAMA Surgery, 2019, 154(6): 530-538.

[42] Coleman R L, Spirtos N M, Enserro D, et al. Secondary surgical cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer[J]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2019, 381(20): 1929-1939. [43] SHI C, GAO Y C, YANG Y J, et al. Comparison of efficacy of robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 17(1): 162.

[44] Clair K H, Tewari K S. Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies[J]. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2020, 46(6): 828-843. 

[45] Harvey L, Hendrick R, Dillon N, et al. A novel robotic endoscopic device used for operative hysteroscopy[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2020, 27(7): 1631-1635. [46] Lewi L, Jani J, Blickstein I, et al. The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008, 199(5): 514e1-8. 

[47] Sayols N, Hernansanz A, Parra J, et al. Vision based robot assistance in TTTS fetal surgery[J]. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856402.

[48] Ahmad M A, Ourak M, Gruijthuijsen C, et al. Deep learning-based monocular placental pose estimation: towards collaborative robotics in fetoscopy[J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2020, 15(9): 1561-1571.

[49] Luk M J, Lobb D, Smith J A. A dynamic compliance cervix phantom robot for latent labor simulation[J]. Soft Robotics, 2018, 5(3): 330-338. 

[50] Rivas-López R, Sandoval-García-Travesí F A. Robotic surgery in gynecology: review of literature[J]. Cirugiay Cirujanos, 2020, 88(1): 107-116.

[51] Lavoue V, Collinet P, Fernandez H. Robotic surgery in gynecology: has France lost its leadership in minimally invasive surgery?[J]. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 2020, 49(4): 101708. 

[52] Peters B S, Armijo P R, Krause C, et al. Review of emerging surgical robotic technology[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32(4): 1636-1655. 

[53] Li J, Esteban-Fernández de Ávila B, Gao W, et al. Micro/nanorobots for biomedicine: delivery, surgery, sensing, and detoxification[J]. Science Robotics, 2017, 2(4): eaam6431. 

[54] Kirson E D, Yaari Y. A novel technique for microdissection of neuronal processes[J]. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2000, 98(2): 119-122. 

[55] Leong T G, Randall C L, Benson B R, et al. Tetherless thermobiochemically actuated microgrippers[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(3): 703-708. 

[56] Henke E M, Schlatter S, Anderson I A. Soft dielectric elastomer oscillators driving bioinspired robots[J]. Soft Robotics, 2017, 4(4): 353-366. 

[57] Bozzini G, Gidaro S, Taverna G. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with the ALF-X robot on pig models[J]. European Urology, 2016, 69(2): 376-377. 

[58] Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S, et al. The Senhance™ surgical robotic system (“Senhance”) for total hysterectomy in obese patients: a pilot study[J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2018, 12(2): 229-234.