目的：对比分析机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术（Robot-assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy，RPD）与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术（Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy，LPD）治疗壶腹周围癌的临床应用情况，并总结RPD的经验。方法：回顾性分析2018 年10 月—2021 年8 月于华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院肝胆外科行RPD 和LPD 手术的93 例患者的临床资料。其中行RPD 者52 例，设为RPD 组；行LPD 者41 例，设为LPD 组。分析两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院费用、并发症等情况。结果：RPD 组所有患者均顺利完成机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术，无中转开腹或中转腹腔镜患者。RPD 组和LPD 组平均手术时间分别为（322.7±94.6）min和（351±102.3）min，平均术中出血量分别为（230.5±178.3）ml 和（302.5±108.6）ml，接受术中输血者分别为3例和5 例，术后首次进食时间分别为（4.3±1.6）d 和（5.7±2.5）d，术后首次肛门排气时间分别为（2.5±1.8）d 和（3.3±2.1）d，住院时间分别为（12.3±4.6）d 和（14.6±5.2）d，住院费用分别为（14.8±5.1）万元和（11.6±3.5）万元，消化道重建时间分别为（91.2±25.3）min 和（112.6±42.5）min。RPD 组住院费用高于LPD 组，消化道重建时间少于LPD 组，组间差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。RPD 组术后发生胰瘘者2 例，胆瘘者1 例，腹腔内出血者1例，胃排空延迟者1 例；LPD 组术后发生胰瘘者3 例，胆瘘者2 例，腹腔内出血者1 例，胃排空延迟者1 例。RPD组胰瘘发生率、胆瘘发生率低于LPD 组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：RPD 较LPD 在临床中应用效果好，术后胰瘘、胆瘘发生率更低，具有一定的临床优势。

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in treating periampullary carcinoma and summarize the clinical experience of RPD. Methods: The clinical data of 93 patients who underwent RPD and LPD in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from October 2018 to August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 52 patients underwent RPD were divided into the RPD group, and 41 patients

underwent LPD into the LPD group. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative length of stay, hospitalization cost, complications and other conditions of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: All surgeries in the RPD group were successfully completed, and no conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery. The mean operative time of RPD group and LPD group were (322.7±94.6) min and (351±102.3)min respectively, with the mean intraoperative blood loss of (230.5±178.3) ml and (302.5±108.6)ml respectively. 3 patients in the RPD group and 5 patients in the LPD group received intraoperative blood transfusion. The first postoperative feeding time of the RPD group and LPD group were (4.3±1.6)d and (5.7±2.5)d respectively, with the first postoperative anal exhaust time of (2.5±1.8)d and (3.3±2.1)d respectively. The length of stay of the RPD group and LPD group were (12.3±4.6) d and (14.6±5.2)d respectively, with the hospitalization cost of (148.0±51.0) thousand CNY and (116.0±35.0) thousand CNY respectively. The reconstruction time of digestive tract of the RPD group and LPD group were (91.2±25.3) min and (112.6±42.5) min respectively. The hospitalization cost of the RPD group was higher than that of the LPD group, and the reconstruction time of digestive tract was shorter than that of the LPD group (P<0.05). In the RPD group, there were 2 cases of pancreatic fistula, 1 case of biliary fistula, 1 case of intraperitoneal bleeding, and 1 case of delayed gastric emptying. In the LPD group, 3 cases of pancreatic fistula, 2 cases of biliary fistula, 1

case of intraperitoneal bleeding, and 1 case of delayed gastric emptying occured after surgery. The incidence of pancreatic fistula and biliary fistula in the RPD group was lower than that in the LPD group, and the difference was statistically significant.Conclusion: The clinical outcomes of RPD is good, and the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula and biliary fistula is lower than that of the LPD, which has certain clinical advantages.

收稿日期：2021-11-15 录用日期：2022-02-13

Received Date: 2021-11-15 Accepted Date: 2022-02-13

基金项目：国家自然科学基金面上项目（81771718）

Foundation Item: National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771718)

通讯作者：万赤丹，Email：chidanwan@163.com

Corresponding Author: WAN Chidan, Email: chidanwan@163.com

引用格式：唐勇，施申超，柴楚星，等. 机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围癌的临床对比研究[J]. 机器人外科学

杂志（中英文），2023，4（2）：85-91.

Citation: TANG Y, SHI S C, CHAI C X, et al. Clinical comparison study on robot-assisted and laparoscopic

pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 4(2): 85-91.

[1] 赵玉沛. 胰十二指肠切除术现状与展望[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(8): 817-820.

[2] 王晓庆, 房锋, 李广涛, 等. 改良Blumgart 胰肠吻合在机器人胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志( 电子版), 2017, 10(6): 361-365.

[3] ZHANG T, ZHAO Z M, GAO Y X, et al. The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center [J]. Surg Endosc, 2019,33(9): 2927-2933.

[4] Varley P R, Zenati M S, Klobuka A, et al. Does robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy improve outcomes in patients with high risk morphometric features compared to the open approach [J]. HPB (Oxford), 2019, 21(6): 695-701.

[5] Torphyr J, Friedman C, Halpern A, et al. Comparing short-term and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy across low and high volume centers [J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 270(6): 1147-1155.

[6] Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Bourdeau T, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is the future: here and now [J].J Am Coll Surg, 2019, 228(4): 613-624.

[7] 中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组, 中国研究型医院学会胰腺病专业委员会, 中华外科杂志编辑部. 胰腺术后外科常见并发症诊治及预防的专家共识(2017)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2017, 55(5): 328-334.

[8] Gonzalez-heredia R, Durgam S, Masrur M, et al.Comparison of different techniques of pancreatic stump management in robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy [J]. Gastrointest Tumors, 2019, 5(34): 68-76.

[9] 刘荣, 赵国栋. LR 式机器人胰十二指肠切除术手术方法建立和技术优化[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志( 电子版), 2016, 9(4): 193-195.

[10] Zureikata H, Postlewait M, Liu Y, et al. A multiinstitutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy [J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 264(4): 640-649.

[11] YAN Q, XU L B, REN Z F, et al. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes [J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(2): 501-509.

[12] Marino M V, Podda M, Gomez Ruiz M, et al. Roboticassisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: the results of a case-matched comparison [J]. J Robot Surg,2020, 14(3): 493-502.

[13] 刘荣, 张恭. 达芬奇机器人胰十二指肠根治术的现状与发展 [J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志( 电子版),2020, 14(1): 1-4.

[14] SHI Y, WANG W, QIU W, et al. Learning curve from 450 cases of robot-assisted pancreaticoduocectomy in a High-Volume Pancreatic Center: optimization of operative procedure and a retrospective study [J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 10(3): 493-502.

[15] ZHOU J, XIONG L, MIAO X, et al. Outcome of robotassisted pancreaticoduodenectomy during initial learning curve versus laparotomy [J]. Sci Rep, 2020,10(1): 9621.

[16] 唐勇, 万赤丹. “隧道法”机器人辅助脾切除术31例[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 25(10): 768-970.

[17] Shyr B U, Chen S C, Shyr Y M, et al. Surgical, survival,and oncological outcomes after vascular resection in robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy [J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(1): 377-383.