目的：探讨人工智能辅助下悬吊式无气腹单孔腹腔镜在妇科手术中的临床应用价值。方法：回顾性 分析海军军医大学第二附属医院 2021 年 10 月—2022 年 10 月诊治的 60 例妇科良性肿瘤患者的临床资料，按手术方 式不同分为人工智能辅助悬吊式无气腹单孔腹腔镜组（A 组）与人工智能辅助气腹单孔腹腔镜组（B 组），每组 30 例。对比两组麻醉前、手术开始不同时间点的血压、心率、呼吸峰压（PIP）、呼气末 CO2 分压（PetCO2）的变化及 两组患者的手术总时间、估计出血量、手术并发症、复苏时间、肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、切口满意度及切 口疼痛评分等指标。结果：A 组患者手术开始后不同时间点的血压、心率、PIP、PetCO2 与麻醉前相比，差异无统计 学意义（P>0.05）；而 B 组患者的上述指标与麻醉前相比显著升高，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。A 组患者的 术中动脉血氧分压（PaO2）、动脉二氧化碳分压（PaCO2）均明显优于 B 组，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两 组患者的手术总时间、术中出血量、手术并发症及切口满意度方面相比，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。A 组患者 的术后复苏时间、肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间及切口疼痛评分均优于 B 组患者，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论：人工智能辅助下悬吊式无气腹单孔腹腔镜技术是一种可行且安全的手术技术，但其临床应用价值仍需进一步 的前瞻性对照研究来验证。

Objective: To explore the clinical application value of AI-assisted suspended gasless single-port laparoscopic surgery in gynecology. Methods: Clinical data of 60 patients who underwent gynecological surgery in our hospital from October 2021 to October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the group A (n=30) and group B (n=30) according to different surgical methods. Patients in the group A received AI-assisted suspended gas less single-port laparoscopic surgery, while patients in the group B underwent CO2 Pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic surgery. The blood pressure, heart rate, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PetCO2), operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anesthesia recovery time, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, postoperative length of hospital stay, surgical complications, satisfaction degree of incision and score of incision pain of the two groups were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in blood pressure, heart rate, PIP and PetCO2 of patients in group A undergoing suspended gasless surgery before and after anesthesia (P>0.05). The blood pressure, heart rate, PIP and PetCO2 of patients in the group B at different time points of surgery were significantly higher than those before anesthesia (P<0.05). The partial pressure of arterial blood oxygen (PaO2) and partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) in the group A were significantly higher than those in the group B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, hospitalization expenses and incision satisfaction (P>0.05). The time of anabiosis after surgery, time of intestinal function recovery after surgery, postoperative hospitalization time and incision pain score of patients in the group A were less than those in the group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: AI-assisted suspended gasless single-port laparoscopic surgery is feasible and safe in gynecology, and is worthy of clinical application.

收稿日期：2022-12-05  录用日期：2023-10-10 

Received Date: 2022-12-05  Accepted Date: 2023-10-10 

基金项目：海军军医大学第二附属医院院内医疗技术重点项目（YLJS2021A-04） 

Foundation Item: Medical Technology Key Project of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Military Medical University (YLJS2021A-04) 

通讯作者：刘晓军，Email：liuxiaojun@smmu.cn 

Corresponding Author: LIU Xiaojun, Email: liuxiaojun@smmu.cn 

引用格式：党建红，孙昊，隋晓馨，等 . 人工智能辅助悬吊式无气腹单孔腹腔镜在妇科手术中的应用价值 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中 英文），2024，5（3）：312-318. 

Citation: DANG J H, SUN H, SUI X X, et al. Application value of AI-assisted suspended gasless single-port laparoscopic surgery in gynecology[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2024, 5(3): 312-318.

[1] 马洁 , 齐美敬 , 熊倬 , 等 . 腹腔镜与传统开腹手术 治疗早期上皮性卵巢癌的临床效果比较 [J]. 宁夏医 科大学学报 , 2020, 42(2): 183-186. 

[2] 刘晓军 , 高京海 , 刘洋 , 等 . 第三代 Da Vinci Si 手 术机器人系统在妇科单孔腹腔镜手术中的初步应 用 [J]. 第二军医大学学报 , 2021, 42(5): 573-576. 

[3] Kim K N, Lee D W, Kim J Y, et al. Carbon dioxide embolism during transoral robotic thyroidectomy: a case report[J]. Head Neck, 2018, 40(3): E25-E28.

[4] Dal Moro F, Crestani A, Valotto C, et al. Anesthesiologic effects of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results of a prospective randomized study[J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2015, 41(3): 466-472. 

[5] Thian Y L, Tan K H, Kwek J W, et al. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata and subcutaneous myoma-a rare complication of laparoscopic myomectomy[J]. Abdom Imaging, 2009, 34(2): 235-238. 

[6] Ikeda N, Ueno M, Kanamura T, et al. Simple technique for gasless transumbilical single-incisional laparoscopicassisted appendectomy[J]. Langenbeck Arch Surg, 2014, 399(3): 359-366. 

[7] Gurusamy K S, Koti R, Davidson B R. Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013, (8): CD006574. 

[8] ZHANG G Y, LIU S Z, YU W B, et al. Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with abdominal wall lift in general surgery: initial experience[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25(1): 298-304. 

[9] Yamada H, Ohki H, Fujimoto K, et al. Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy with abdominal wall lift during pregnancy under combined spinal- epidural anesthesia[J]. Masui, 2004, 53(10): 1155-1158. 

[10] Sesti F, Melgrati L, Damiani A, et al. Isobaric (gasless) laparoscopic uterine myomectomy. An overview[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2006, 129(1): 9-14. 

[11] Ulker K, Huseyinoglu U, Kilic N. Management of benign ovarian cysts by a novel, gasless, single-incision laparoscopic technique: keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery (KARS)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(1): 189-198. 

[12] Ulker K, Huseyinoglu. Comparison of tubal sterilization procedures performed by keyless abdominal ropelifting surgery and conventional CO2 laparoscopy: a case controlled clinical study[J]. Scientific World Journal, 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/963615. 

[13] Makinen M T, Yli-Hankala A. The effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on respiratory compliance as determined by continuous spirometry[J]. J Clin Anesth, 1996, 8(2): 119-122. 

[14] Pelosi P, Foti G, Cereda M, et al. Effects of carbon dioxide insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the respiratory system[J]. Anaesthesia, 1996, 51(8): 744-749. 

[15] Dorsay D A, Greene F L, Baysinger C L. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy monitored with transesophageal echocardiography[J]. Surg Endosc, 1995, 9(2): 128-133. 

[16] McLaughlin J G, Scheeres D E, Dean R J, et al. The adverse hemodynamic effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 1995, 9(2): 121-124. 

[17] Westerband A, Van De Water J, Amzallag M, et al. Cardiovascular changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1992, 175(6): 535-538. 

[18] Koksoy C, Kuzu M A, Kurt I, et al. Haemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective comparative study using bioimpedance cardiography[J]. Br J Surg, 1995, 82(7): 972-974. 

[19] Goll V, Akca O, Greif R, et al. Ondansetron is no more effective than supplemental intraoperative oxygen for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting[J]. Anesth Analg, 2001, 92(1): 112-117. 

[20] Son J S, OH J Y, Ko S. Effects of hypercapnia on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery: a double-blind randomized controlled study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(11): 4576-4582. 

[21] Ulker K, Huseyinoglu U, Cicek M. Early postoperative pain after keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery[J]. JSLS, 2015, 19(1): e2013.00392.