目的:分析激励式护理模式在经口入路机器人辅助甲状腺全麻手术患者中的应用效果。方法:选取 2022 年 7 月—2023 年 11 月于空军军医大学第二附属医院行经口入路机器人辅助甲状腺全麻手术的患者 102 例,以 随机数表法将其分为对照组(51 例,进行常规围甲状腺手术护理)和研究组(51 例,进行激励式护理模式管理)。 比较两组患者临床指标、干预不同时间段自我效能感量表(GSES)评分、干预前后汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)及 抑郁量表(HAMD)评分、治疗依从性、护理满意度差异。结果:与对照组相比,研究组术后 48 h 疼痛评分更低, 首次下床时间、住院时间更短,住院费用更少,术前 1 d、术后 1 d、术后 3 d GSES 评分更高,干预后 HAMA 评分、 HAMD 评分更低,总依从率、总满意度更高。两组并发症发生率比较无显著差异。结论:激励式护理模式可提高经 口入路机器人辅助甲状腺全麻手术患者康复效率与自我效能、治疗依从性及护理满意度,改善负性情绪。
Objective: To analyze the application effect of incentive-based intervention in patients undergoing robotassisted transoral thyroid surgery with general anesthesia. Methods: 102 patients who were scheduled to undergo robot-assisted transoral thyroid surgery with general anesthesia at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from July 2022 to November 2023 were selected and randomly divided into the control group (n=51) and the study group (n=51) using a random number table. The control group received routine thyroid surgery nursing care and patients in the study group were given incentive nursing management. The clinical indicators, General Self Efficacy Scale (GSES) scores at different time points of intervention of patients in the two groups were compared. Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) scores, treatment compliance, and nursing satisfaction before and after intervention were compared between the two groups of patients. Results: Compared with the control group, the study group had lower pain score at 48 h after surgery, shorter first off-bed time and hospital stay, less hospital cost, higher 1 d before surgery, 1 d and 3 d after surgery GSES, lower HAMA and HAMD scores after intervention, and higher total compliance rate and total satisfaction. There was no significant difference in the complication rates between the two groups of patients. Conclusion: The incentive-based intervention could improve the rehabilitation efficiency and self-efficacy, treatment compliance, and nursing satisfaction of patients undergoing robot-assisted transoral thyroid surgery with general anesthesia, and alleviate negative emotions.
收稿日期:2023-12-19 录用日期:2024-01-22
Received Date: 2023-12-19 Accepted Date: 2024-01-22
基金项目:陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(S2016ZDJC0058)
Foundation Item: Natural Science Basic Research Plan Project of Shaanxi Province (S2016ZDJC0058)
通讯作者:曹莉莉,Email:caolili0722@163.com
Corresponding Author: CAO Lili, Email: caolili0722@163.com
引用格式:武鹏,王慧,曹莉莉 . 激励式护理模式在经口入路机器人辅助甲状腺全麻手术患者中的实施及影响 [J]. 机器人外科学杂 志(中英文),2024,5(3):379-385.
Citation: WU P, WANG H, CAO L L. Implementation and effect of incentive-based intervention for patients undergoing robotassisted transoral thyroid surgery with general anesthesia [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2024, 5(3): 379-385.
[1] SU B Q, LI H, XIU W, et al. Autonomous aspirating robot for removing saliva blood mixed liquid in oral surgery[J]. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2023, 26(13): 1523-1531.
[2] TUO YA S R, LEI Y Y, BAO L X, et al. Effects of nursing intervention based on a positive motivational model on cardiac function, self-management and quality of life in elderly patients with coronary heart disease[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2023, 27(17): 7977-7987.
[3] 牛芝云 , 杨亚莉 , 李银娜 . 围手术期快速康复外科联 合激励式护理对甲状腺癌手术患者术后的影响 [J]. 山西医药杂志 , 2021, 50(3): 488-491.
[4] 中华医学会内分泌学分会 , 中华医学会外科学分 会 , 中国抗癌协会头颈肿瘤专业委员会 , 等 . 甲状 腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南 [J]. 中国肿瘤临 床 , 2012, 39(17): 1249-1272.
[5] 李素婷 , 李红杰 , 王艳红 , 等 . 不同疼痛量表在肝癌 患者动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛评估中的应用比较 [J]. 护士进修杂志 , 2021, 36(15): 1345-1348+1353.
[6] 沙璐璐 , 刘长红 , 刘鸿 , 等 . 心脏瓣膜置换术后自 我效能感量表评分的影响因素分析及心理干预应 用价值 [J]. 实用医院临床杂志 , 2022, 19(4): 71-74.
[7] 熊正花 , 胡勇 , 张娟 , 等 . 盆腔器官脱垂患者焦 虑、抑郁及生活质量测定量表最小临床重要性差 值计算的临床意义 [J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志 , 2022, 23(4): 378-381.
[8] SALZANO G, TOGO G, MAGLITTO F, et al. Trans-oral robotic surgery: 14 cases of pleomorphic adenoma of the parapharyngeal space[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2022, 33(5): 1587-1590.
[9] LO E M, KIM H L. Robot-assisted surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2021, 48(1): 71-80.
[10] WONG S W, CROWE P. Workflow disruptions in robot-assisted surgery[J]. J Robot Surg, 2023, 17(6): 2663-2669.
[11] 李欢 , 马从忆 , 陈关凤 , 等 . 基于时效性激励理论的 快速康复外科护理对甲状腺癌手术患者疼痛和舒适 度的影响 [J]. 现代临床护理 , 2023, 22(2): 40-45.
[12] MAYBEE A, WINEMAKER S, HOWARD M, et al. Palliative care physicians’ motivations for models of practicing in the community: a qualitative descriptive study[J]. Palliat Med, 2022, 36(1): 181-188.
[13] 马红丽 , 王清 , 张丽萍 . 激励理论用于甲状腺癌围 手术期护理中的效果 [J]. 中国药物与临床 , 2020, 20(4): 648-650.
[14] 张会娟 , 秦乡音 , 李倩 , 等 . 聚焦解决模式对分化 型甲状腺癌患者 131I 治疗的负面情绪、自护能力 及疼痛的影响 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志 , 2020, 47(3): 630-633.
[15] Berkel C, Mauricio A M, Rudo-Stern J, et al. Motivational interviewing and caregiver engagement in the family check-up 4 health[J]. Prev Sci, 2021, 22(6): 737-746.
[16] 于庆霞 . 综合护理对甲状腺手术全身麻醉患者不良 情绪及疼痛影响 [J]. 中国药物与临床 , 2021, 21(11): 1994-1995.
[17] 杜娟 , 李慧 . 心理调护与饮食护理对甲状腺手术患 者情绪及生命体征的影响 [J]. 现代中西医结合杂 志 , 2020, 29(4): 436-439.
[18] Brinkman-Majewski R E, Weiss W M. The influence of the motivational climate on rehabilitation behaviors and patient satisfaction[J]. J Sport Rehabil, 2022, 31(8): 1016-1022.
[19] 姚岚 , 郭菲 . 手术室护理干预对甲状腺手术患者应 激反应及心理状态的影响 [J]. 长春中医药大学学 报 , 2020, 36(6): 1294-1296.
[20] 方针针 , 张秋菊 . 临床路径护理对甲状腺手术患者 护理满意度及甲状腺手术认知的影响分析 [J]. 贵州 医药 , 2021, 45(9): 1509-1510.
[21] Kaczmarek T, Kavanagh D J, Lazzarini P A, et al. Training diabetes healthcare practitioners in motivational interviewing: a systematic review.[J] Health Psychol Rev, 2022, 16(3): 430-449.