中国的机器人外科学杂志 | ISSN 2096-7721 | CN 10-1650/R

人工智能消化内镜系统辅助结肠息肉诊断的临床应用及影响因素分析

Clinical application of AI digestive endoscopic system assisted diagnosis on colonic polyps and influencing factors analysis

作者:朱丽丽,石嫦娥,占俊,汪文生,唐敏,齐乐

Vol. 5 No. 3 Jun. 2024 DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2024.03.027 发布日期:2024-05-24
关键词:人工智能消化内镜系统;结肠息肉;辅助诊断;检出率;影响因素

作者简介:

目的:探讨人工智能消化内镜系统辅助诊断对结肠息肉检出情况的影响。方法:回顾性分析 2022 年 10 月—2023 年 10 月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院进行内镜检查的 150 例息肉初筛高危患者的临床资料及检测结果。 根据患者意愿,81 例接受“影诺鹰眼”人工智能消化内镜系统辅助无痛结肠镜检查,69 例接受普通无痛结肠镜检查。 比较两种检查方法对结肠息肉的检出率,分析影响检出率的相关因素。结果:结肠息肉总检出率 54.00%(81/150), 接受无痛结肠镜检查患者的检出率为 44.93%(31/69),低于人工智能消化内镜系统辅助无痛结肠镜检查的 61.73% (50/81)。检出组患者年龄、男性占比、BMI、有慢性腹泻或便秘症状者占比、有肠道息肉史者占比、肠道准备评分、 人工智能消化内镜系统使用率均高于未检出组。Logistic 回归分析显示,受检者的年龄及是否使用人工智能消化内镜 系统是结肠息肉检出率的独立影响因素,年龄、肠道准备评分和退镜时间是影响人工智能消化内镜系统检出率的独 立影响因素。结论:高龄、肥胖、肠道息肉史、慢性腹泻或便秘人群是结肠息肉高发人群,应加强结肠息肉检查; 使用“影诺鹰眼”人工智能消化内镜系统辅助检查、提高肠道准备评分、延长退镜时间有助于提高结肠息肉的检出率。

Objective: To explore the clinical application value of AI digestive endoscopic system assisted diagnosis on colon polyps. Methods: Clinical data and test results of 150 cases of polyp screening for high-risk patients underwent endoscopic examination in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from October 2022 to October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the patients’ willingness, 81 patients received painless colonoscopy assisted by AI digestive endoscopic system (Innovision Eagle-Eye Endoscopy®), 69 cases received normal painless colonoscopy. The colon polyp detection rates of the two groups were compared, colon polyp detection influencing factors were analyzed. Results: The total detection rate of colon polyp was 54.00% (81/150), and the detection rate of patients who underwent normal painless colonoscopy was 44.93% (31/69), which was lower than 61.73% (50/81) of AI digestive endoscopic system assisted painless colonoscopy. The age of patients, percentage of male, BMI, percentage of those with chronic diarrhea or constipation, percentage of those with a history of intestinal polyps, bowel preparation score, and percentage of using AI digestive endoscopic system were higher in the detected group than the non-detected group. Logistic regression analysis results showed that age and using AI digestive endoscopic system or not were the independent factors on the detection rate of colon polyps, age, bowel preparation score and exit time were independent factors on the detection rate of AI digestive endoscopic system. Conclusion: People with advanced age, obesity, history of intestinal polyps, and chronic diarrhea or constipation are the most common groups of colon polyps, thus detection of colon polyp should be strengthened. Using Innovision Eagle-Eye Endoscopy® AI digestive endoscopic system to assist the detection, improving the bowel preparation score and prolonging the time of exit are helpful to improve the detection rate of colon polyps.

稿件信息

收稿日期:2024-03-06  录用日期:2024-04-20 

Received Date: 2024-03-06  Accepted Date: 2024-04-20 

基金项目:安徽医科大学临床医学学科建设项目基金(2020lcxk033);安徽省教育厅高等学校省级质量工程项目(2020jyxm0907) 

Foundation Item: Clinical Medicine Discipline Construction Project Fund of Anhui Medical University (2020lcxk033); Provinelevel Quality Engineering Project for Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Education Department (2020jyxm0907) 

通讯作者:唐敏,Email:tangpanpan1@163.com;齐乐,Email:174319626@qq.com 

Corresponding Author: TANG Min, Email: tangpanpan1@163.com; QI Le, Email: 174319626@qq.com 

引用格式:朱丽丽,石嫦娥,占俊,等 . 人工智能消化内镜系统辅助结肠息肉诊断的临床应用及影响因素分析 [J]. 机器人外科学杂 志(中英文),2024,5(3):478-483. 

Citation: ZHU L L, SHI C E, ZHAN J, et al. Clinical application of AI digestive endoscopic system assisted diagnosis on colonic polyps and influencing factors analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2024, 5(3): 478-483.

参考文献

[1] Burgess N G, Bourke M J. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colon polyps: use both for the best outcomes[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2024, 177(1): 89-90. 

[2] Pattarajierapan S, Khomvilai S. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colon polyps with submucosal fibrosis using the combination of near-focus mode and traction device[J]. VideoGIE, 2023, 8(11): 469-471. 

[3] Ahmed Z, Ramai D, Merza N, et al. Safety and efficacy of powered non-thermal endoscopic resection device for removal of colonic polyps: a systematic review and meta-Analysis[J]. Gastroenterology Res, 2023, 16(5): 254-261. 

[4] Yamamoto S, Kozuki M, Matsushima K, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a dedicated bipolar soft snare for large flat colonic polyps[J]. Endoscopy, 2023, 55(S01): E1045-E1046. 

[5] Mena-Ramírez R, Macari-Jorge A, Juárez-Hernández E, et al. Accuracy of narrow-band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification for predicting the histology of colon polyps by experienced endoscopists and trainees[J].Turk J Gastroenterol, 2023, 34(8): 866- 872. 

[6] Abdallah M, Ahmed K, Abbas D, et al. Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection for colon polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Endoscopy, 2023, 55(12): 1083-1094. 

[7] Nehme F, Coronel E, Taherian M, et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of a right colonic polypoid arteriovenous malformation[J]. VideoGIE, 2023, 8(5): 208-210. 

[8] Radadiya D. Deep cuts: colonic polyp resection using standard endoscopic mucosal resection vs. precutting endoscopic mucosal resection using a novel disk tip snare[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2023, 68(5): 1663-1664. 

[9] Okimoto K, Matsumura T, Akizue N, et al. Endoscopic band ligation for the removal of colonic polyp invading the diverticulum[J]. Endoscopy, 2022, 54(12): E713-E714. 

[10] Jinushi R, Tashima T, Ishii N, et al. Endoscopic hemostasis using gel immersion endoscopy for duodenal ulcer and a sigmoid colon polyp: a novel gel injection method[J]. JGH Open, 2022, 6(11): 809-811. 

[11] Onyishi N T, Lebbie A, Sesay A A, et al. Mature solid teratoma of the retroperitoneum presenting as sigmoid colon polyp with lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a case report[J]. Ethiop J Health Sci, 2022, 32(5): 1043-1046. 

[12] Koffas A, Papaefthymiou A, Laskaratos F M, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of colon polyps: who needs a colonoscopy?[J]. Diagnostics, 2022, 12(9): 2093. 

[13] Nemoto D, Guo Z, Peng B, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of serrated colorectal lesions using nonmagnified white-light endoscopic images[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2022, 37(8): 1875-1884. 

[14] Takada K, Hotta K, Imai K. Visualization of tumor margins with red dichromatic imaging after postinjection bleeding during tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for a colon polyp[J]. Dig Endosc, 2022, 34(5): e109-e110. 

[15] Shimoda R, Akutagawa T, Tomonaga M, et al. Estimating colorectal polyp size with a virtual scale endoscope and visual estimation during colonoscopy: Prospective, preliminary comparison of accuracy[J]. Dig Endosc, 2022, 34(7): 1471-1477. 

[16] 柳欣欣 , 刘江 , 江志伟 , 等 . 微创及加速康复外科 在结直肠手术中的应用 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 ( 中 英文 ), 2020, 1(1): 18-25. 

[17] Hayat M, Azeem N, Bilal M. Colon polypectomy with endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic fullthickness resection[J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2022, 32(2): 277-298. 

[18] Hori K, Ikematsu H, Yamamoto Y, et al. Detecting colon polyps in endoscopic images using artificial intelligence constructed with automated collection of annotated images from an endoscopy reporting system[J]. Dig Endosc, 2021, 34(5): 1021-1029. 

[19] Choi H H, Kim C W, Kim H K, et al. A novel technique using endoscopic band ligation for removal of longstalked (>10 mm) pedunculated colon polyps: A prospective pilot study[J]. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2021, 27(5): 296-301. 

[20] Ando T, Nakajima T, Fukuda R, et al. Intensive surveillance endoscopy for multiple gastrointestinal tumors in a patient with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency: case report[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2021, 21(1): 326. 

[21] 史新龙 , 朱小龙 , 王赫 , 等 . 机器人与腹腔镜在右 半结肠癌切除术中的疗效对比 [J]. 机器人外科学杂 志 ( 中英文 ), 2020, 1(5): 307-316. 

[22] Golda T, Lazzara C, Sorribas M, et al. Combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) can avoid segmental colectomy in endoscopically unremovable colonic polyps: a cohort study over 10 years[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(1): 196-205. 

[23] Romutis S, Matta B, Ibinson J, et al. Safety and efficacy of band ligation and auto-amputation as adjunct to EMR of colonic large laterally spreading tumors, and polyps not amenable to routine polypectomy[J]. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/26317745211001750. 

[24] Kishida Y, Hotta K, Imai K, et al. Effectiveness of suction valve button removal in retrieving resected colon polyps for better histological assessment: a propensity score matching analysis[J]. Dig Endosc, 2020, 33(3): 433-440. 

[25] Tagawa T, Yamada M, Minagawa T, et al. Endoscopic characteristics influencing postpolypectomy bleeding in 1147 consecutive pedunculated colonic polyps: a multicenter retrospective study[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2021, 94(4): 803-811.e6. 

[26] Marres C C M, Smit M P C M, van der Bilt J D W, et al. Laparoscopic wedge excision as an alternative for laparoscopic oncological colon resection in benign endoscopically unresectable colon polyps[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2021, 23(9): 2361-2367. 

[27] van Hattem W A, Shahidi N, Vosko S, et al. Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions: a retrospective comparison across two successive periods[J]. Gut, 2020, 70(9): 1691-1697. 

[28] Rodríguez de Santiago E, Hernández-Tejero M, RiveroSánchez L, et al. Management and outcomes of bleeding within 30 days of colonic polypectomy in a large, reallife multicenter cohort study[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2021, 19(4): 732-742.e6. 

[29] Worland T, Cronin O, Harrison B, et al. Clinical and financial impacts of introducing an endoscopic mucosal resection service for treatment of patients with large colonic polyps into a regional tertiary hospital[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2019, 7(11): E1386-E1392. 

[30] Yoshida N, Inoue K, Dohi O, et al. Analysis of texture and color enhancement imaging for improving the visibility of non-polypoid colorectal lesions[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2022, 67(12): 5657-5665.

本期文章
[1] 机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗肾结石及危险因素的研究进展 [2] 机器人辅助腹腔镜技术在腹股沟淋巴结切除术中的应用 [3] 智慧静脉药物配液机器人风险屏障机制探讨 [4] 手术机器人导航系统在皮肤真皮层抽脂中的应用 [5] 人工智能消化内镜系统辅助结肠息肉诊断的临床应用及影响因素分析 [6] 达芬奇机器人辅助全子宫切除术后患者正念影响因素的线性回归及改善策略分析 [7] 激励理论联合协同干预对天玑骨科手术机器人治疗后的颈脊髓损伤患者功能康复和应对倾向的影响 [8] 术中改良体位联合风险管理对机器人辅助下直肠癌根治术患者术后疼痛及并发症发生风险的影响 [9] 人工扶镜与机器人辅助扶镜下腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者的临床疗效比较 [10] 机器人与腹腔镜辅助下肝切除手术对肝癌患者术后康复的效果对比 [11] 基于二元 Logistics 回归模型分析机器人辅助子宫 内膜癌术后并发症危险因素 [12] 机器人辅助手术在复杂大子宫中的应用及疗效分析(附手术视频) [13] 机器人辅助阴道骶骨固定术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的疗效分析(附手术视频) [14] 吲哚菁绿近红外荧光显影技术在机器人辅助腹腔镜上尿路修复重建手术中的应用(附手术视频) [15] 基于 ERAS 机器人辅助非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的精准护理模式应用效果 [16] 机器人辅助腹腔镜膀胱癌根治术患者病耻感危险因素分析及护理对策 [17] 达芬奇机器人辅助下肝癌根治术的临床疗效及围手术期护理路径的构建 [18] 机器人辅助下结直肠癌根治术患者强化康复护理干预体会 [19] 激励式护理模式在经口入路机器人辅助甲状腺全麻手术患者中的实施及影响 [20] 早期肺癌患者行机器人辅助下肺癌根治术后并发症危险因素分析及护理对策 [21] 患者参与式护理干预应用于骨科机器人辅助髋臼骨折微创手术患者的临床效果 [22] Robocare 护理模式在达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜宫颈癌根治术全程护理中的应用 [23] 布比卡因脂质体注射与腹横肌平面阻滞治疗机器人辅助腹腔镜下妇科肿瘤手术后疼痛比较 [24] 超声引导下星状神经节阻滞对机器人辅助腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术患者术中应激反应水平及术后认知功能恢复情况的影响 [25] 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞对机器人辅助全子宫切除术后疼痛的影响 [26] 鞘内吗啡镇痛与硬膜外镇痛对机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术患者术后疼痛和并发症的影响 [27] 加速康复外科在腹膜外免 PORT 单切口机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术围手术期的应用效果 [28] 人工智能辅助悬吊式无气腹单孔腹腔镜在妇科手术中的 应用价值 [29] 达芬奇机器人辅助下单孔与多孔腹腔镜手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的疗效对比 [30] 达芬奇机器人 SP 系统在泌尿外科的应用与发展
印象笔记
有道云笔记
微博
QQ空间
微信
二维码
意见反馈