目的：探索超声引导下腰方肌阻滞在子宫肌瘤患者机器人辅助手术中的镇痛效果、应激水平及苏醒 质量的影响。方法：前瞻性选取 2020 年 5 月—2023 年 5 月在太和医院行机器人辅助子宫肌瘤剔除术的 80 例患者， 采用随机数字表法分为两组，对照组 40 例进行全凭静脉麻醉，观察组 40 例实施超声引导下腰方肌阻滞后再行全麻， 比较两组麻醉效果。结果：观察组拔除气管导管时间、呼之睁眼时间、恢复室停留时间、术后下床活动时间、定向 力恢复时间短于对照组，丙泊酚用量、术后 24 h 镇痛泵按压次数少于对照组，术后躁动率低于对照组。同时观察组 术后 VAS 评分低于对照组，术中及术后的血氧饱和度、平均动脉压、心率均高于对照组，NE、COR、GLU 均低于 对照组。结论：对行机器人辅助手术子宫肌瘤剔除术患者进行超声引导下腰方肌阻滞麻醉，具有较好镇痛、镇静效果， 可缩短定向力恢复时间，稳定围手术期血流动力学，减轻机体应激状况。

Objective: To explore the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block in robotassisted surgery for patients with uterine fibroids and its effect on stress level and quality of awakening. Methods: 80 patients with uterine fibroids who underwent robot-assisted uterine myomectomy at Taihe hospital from May 2020 to May 2023 were prospectively selected. They were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group using random number table method. The control group (n=40) received total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), while the observation group (n=40) received ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block before general anesthesia. The anesthesia effects of the two groups were compared. Results: Compared to the control group, the observation group had shorter time for removing the endotracheal tube, eye opening to speech, recovery room staying time, postoperative mobilization time, and directional force recovery time. The dosage of propofol and the number of analgesic pump press at 24 hours after surgery were lower than those in the control group. The rate of postoperative agitation was lower in the observation group than that in the control group. Meanwhile, the observation group had a lower postoperative VAS scores compared to the control group. Intraoperative and postoperative SpO2, MAP, and HR were higher in the observation group than those in the control group, and the NE, COR, and GLU levels were lower in the observation group than those in the control group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block is more effective for patients with uterine fibroids undergoing robot-assisted surgery, which could provide patients with better analgesia and sedation, shorten recovery time, stabilize perioperative hemodynamics, and reduce stress on the body.

收稿日期：2023-11-07  录用日期：2023-12-04 

Received Date: 2023-11-07  Accepted Date: 2023-12-04 

基金项目：湖北省卫生健康委员会科研项目（WJ2020M255） 

Foundation Item: Scientific Research Program of Health Commission of Hubei Province (WJ2020M255) 

通讯作者：孙艳芳，Email：214441508@qq.com 

Corresponding Author: SUN Yanfang, Email: 214441508@qq.com 

引用格式：宋晓雨，陈炫龙，孙艳芳 . 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞在子宫肌瘤患者机器人辅助手术中的镇痛效果、应激水平及苏醒质 量相关分析 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中英文），2024，5（4）：608-614. 

Citation: SONG X Y, CHEN X L, SUN Y F. Analysis on the analgesic effect, stress level and recovery quality of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block in robot-assisted surgery for patients with uterine fibroids[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2024, 5(4): 608-614.

[1] Mollier J, Patel N R, Amoah A, et al. Clinical, imaging and procedural risk factors for intrauterine infective complications after uterine fibroid embolisation: a retrospective case control study[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2020, 43(12): 1910-1917. 

[2] Ghanaati H, Sanaati M, Shakiba M, et al. Pregnancy and its outcomes in patients after uterine fibroid embolization: a systematic review and meta-Analysis[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2020, 43(8): 1122- 1133. 

[3] 张辉 , 张滢 , 赵伟 , 等 . 全身麻醉复合超声引导下腰方肌阻滞对 后腹膜腔镜手术术后疼痛及恢复质量的影响 [J]. 医学研究杂志 , 2022, 51(9): 93-96, 121. 

[4] 张保军 , 王凯 , 王丽华 , 等 . 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞对卵巢癌 患者术后 MMSE 评分的影响 [J]. 实用癌症杂志 , 2021, 36(12): 2050-2053. 

[5] 李晓婷 , 汤裕泉 , 王胜斌 . 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞复合喉罩 全麻在老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用 [J]. 中国老年学杂志 , 2023, 43(17): 4163-4166. 

[6] Amoah A, Joseph N, Reap S, et al. Appraisal of national and international uterine fibroid management guidelines: a systematic review[J]. BJOG, 2022, 129(3): 356-364. 

[7] 钟照明 , 曹磊 , 姚立群 . 静吸复合麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉对老年 腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术患者早期认知功能的影响 [J]. 中国医刊 , 2022, 57(2): 216-219. 

[8] Osorio W, Posada N, Cano J, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal type 2 fibroids with cold enucleation technique and complete fibroid extraction using a double-lumen intracervical cannula[J]. Fertil Steril, 2021, 115(2): 522-524. 

[9] 葛静 , 那晶 , 王军 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人系统在复杂性子宫肌瘤剔 除术中的应用 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 , 2020, 1(2): 94-101. 

[10] 刘欢 , 王露 , 周清梓 . 舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚与右美托咪定复合 丙泊酚麻醉在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中应用比较 [J]. 贵州医药 , 2023, 47(1): 53-54. 

[11] KAN X Q, SHEN X X, FENG LI, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy between laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional laparotomy for patients with uterine fibroids and their effect on pregnancy rate after surgery[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2021, 22(3): 913. 

[12] 侯海涛 , 邓立琴 , 邱玉雪 , 等 . 不同手术时间麻醉对子宫肌瘤 剔除术后患者早期恢复的影响 [J]. 宁夏医科大学学报 , 2022, 44(10): 1029-1033. 

[13] 凤旭东 , 鲍乐乐 , 孔二亮 , 等 . 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞在经腹 直肠癌根治术后镇痛中的应用效果 [J]. 中国药物与临床 , 2021, 21(14): 2430-2432. 

[14] 孙晓佳 , 汪业铭 , 孟晨雪 , 等 . 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞联合艾司 氯胺酮在老年腹腔镜肾癌根治术患者中的应用效果 [J]. 中国临 床医生杂志 , 2023, 51(10): 1222-1225. 

[15] 孟彬 , 徐明民 , 耿喆 , 等 . 超声引导局部浸润麻醉下子宫肌瘤微 波消融临床效果观察 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志 , 2022, 38(8): 914- 916. 

[16] 乔克坤 , 李向 , 向志雄 . 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞联合全麻对腹 腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中血流动力学及镇痛效果的影响 [J]. 广西 医科大学学报 , 2020, 37(4): 751-755. 

[17] Balocco A L, López A M, Kesteloot C, et al. Quadratus lumborum block: an imaging study of three approaches[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2021, 46(1): 35-40. 

[18] 马鑫 , 沈勤 , 吴宣 . 腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术不同麻醉方案效果 及对患者应激反应、认知功能的影响 [J]. 中国计划生育学杂志 , 2022, 30(9): 2006-2011. 

[19] 曹文鹏 , 郑凯文 . 腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术静吸复合麻醉对患者 应激状况、苏醒质量及认知功能的影响 [J]. 中国计划生育学杂 志 , 2023, 31(3): 527-532. 

[20] Knudsen N I, Wernecke K D, Kentenich H, et al. Comparison of clinical symptoms of assumed vs. actual uterine fibroids-symptoms described by patients and ultrasound findings[J]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2020, 80(3): 316-323. 

[21] 陈红 , 罗爱林 , 李世勇 , 等 . 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞对腹腔镜子 宫肌瘤剔除术患者镇静 Ramsay 评分、血清应激指标及苏醒质 量的影响 [J]. 中国计划生育学杂志 , 2022, 30(7): 1564-1568. 

[22] 陈靖军 , 赵向波 , 勾志静 , 等 . 静吸复合麻醉与单纯静脉麻醉对 老年子宫肌瘤腹腔镜切除术患者认知功能及应激指标影响 [J]. 中国计划生育学杂志 , 2020, 28(1): 76-79. 

[23] 朱荣誉 , 朱贤林 , 吴述轩 . 小剂量氯胺酮联合瑞芬太尼麻醉对 子宫肌瘤剔除术患者血流动力学及疼痛介质水平的影响 [J]. 中 国医药 , 2021, 16(7): 1074-1077. 

[24] 王辉 , 邓雪峰 , 耿兴强 . 静吸复合麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉对老年 子宫肌瘤患者腹腔镜剥除术后认知功能及血流动力学影响 [J]. 中国计划生育学杂志 , 2023, 31(6): 1316-1320.