目的：探讨信息识别技术联合 Mako 机器人辅助关节置换手术中的应用。方法：选取秦皇岛市第一医 院在 2023 年 11 月—2024 年 3 月收治的 40 例拟行髋膝关节置换手术的住院患者，随机分成对照组和研究组，每组 20 例。对照组采用传统关节置换术，研究组采用信息识别技术联合 Mako 机器人辅助关节置换术。比较两组患者术 前准备过程用时、围手术期相关指标、术后疼痛程度和患者满意度。结果：研究组术前核对时间、总准备时间、首 次下床时间、术后住院时间均短于对照组（P<0.05）；两组术中出血量比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；与术 后 6 h 比较，术后 12 h、24 h 两组视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分逐渐降低，术后 6 h、12 h，研究组 VAS 评分均低于 对照组（P<0.05），两组术后 24 h VAS 评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；随访 1 个月，研究组总满意度高 于对照组（P<0.05）。结论：信息识别技术联合 Mako 机器人辅助关节置换手术，可在一定程度上缩短术前准备时间、 患者首次下床时间及术后住院时间，改善术后疼痛程度，患者满意度更高。

Objective: To explore the application effect of information recognition technology in Mako robot-assisted joint replacement surgery. Methods: 40 patients who underwent hip and knee arthroplasty in the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao City from November 2023 to March 2024 were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the study group, with 20 cases in each group. The control group received traditional joint replacement, and the study group received information recognition technology combined with Mako robot-assisted joint replacement. The preoperative preparation time, perioperative indicators, postoperative pain and patient satisfaction between the two groups were compared. Results: The preoperative checking time, total preparation time, first off-bed time, and postoperative hospitalization time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of intraoperative bleeding between the two groups (P>0.05). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the two groups gradually decreased 12 h and 24 h after surgery compared with those 6 h postoperatively, and the VAS scores of the study group at 6 h and 12 h after surgery were all lower than that of the control group (P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the VAS scores 24 h after surgery (P>0.05). After 1-month follow-up, the total satisfaction rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Application of information recognition technology in Mako robot-assisted joint replacement surgery can shorten the preoperative preparation time, the first time out of bed and postoperative length of hospital stay to a certain extent, it can also relieve the postoperative pain and improve patient satisfaction.

收稿日期：2024-06-07  录用日期：2024-07-11 

Received Date: 2024-06-07  Accepted Date: 2024-07-11 

基金项目：秦皇岛市科学技术研究与发展计划任务书（202101A147） 

Foundation Item: Qinhuangdao Science and Technology Research and Development Plan (202101A147) 

通讯作者：朱岩，Email：lzl2635@163.com 

Corresponding Author: ZHU Yan, Email: lzl2635@163.com 

引用格式：黄越玫，朱岩，孙晓娇 ，等 . 信息识别技术联合 Mako 机器人辅助关节置换术的应用 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中英文）， 2024，5（5）：803-807. 

Citation: HUANG Y M, ZHU Y, SUN X J, et al. Application of information recognition technology in Mako robot-assisted joint replacement [J].Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2024, 5(5): 803-807.

[1] Singh J A, Yu S, Chen L, et al. Rates of total joint replacement in the united states: future projections to 2020-2040 using the national inpatient sample[J]. J Rheumatol, 2019, 46(9): 1134-1140. 

[2] 郑美贞 , 毛平 . 髋膝关节置换术后患者跌倒恐惧的不良结局及 其影响因素研究进展 [J]. 护理与康复 , 2023, 22(1): 85-89, 94. 

[3] 何宜蓁 , 耿霄 , 田华 . 机器人辅助髋膝关节置换术的应用现状 及趋势分析 [J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志 , 2023, 16(4): 378-384. 

[4] 崔可赜 , 郭祥 , 韩贵斌 , 等 . Mako 机器人辅助后外侧入路全髋 关节置换术 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志 , 2020, 28(4): 356-359. 

[5] 郭晓雨 , 李雪云 . Mako 机器人系统辅助全髋关节置换术与传统 全髋关节置换术护理配合比较 [J]. 齐鲁护理杂志 , 2019, 25(22): 64-66. 

[6] 杨阳 , 杨勇 , 刘常宇 , 等 . 机器人辅助与传统截骨行全膝关节置 换术的早期临床疗效对比 [J]. 骨科 , 2023, 14(6): 523-529. 

[7] Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study[J]. Bone Joint J, 2018, 100(7): 930-937. 

[8] 刘思佳 , 赵磊 , 李格格 . 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术对股骨旋 转对线及早期疗效的研究进展 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 ( 中英文 ), 2023, 4(6): 593-596. 

[9] 高兴莲 , 胡娟娟 , 杨英 , 等 . 多种信息识别技术在医院手术部创新 管理模式中的应用研究 [J]. 中国医学装备 , 2019, 16(3): 120-123. 

[10] 银彩霞 , 林牡丹 , 柴伟 . 机器人系统辅助的膝关节单髁置换术 治疗老年膝关节骨关节炎的临床效果 [J]. 中华老年多器官疾病 杂志 , 2021, 20(7): 504-507. 

[11] Goodman S M, Mehta B Y, Kahlenberg C A, et al. Assessment of a satisfaction measure for use after primary total joint arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(7): 1792-1799. 

[12] Evans J T, Evans J P, Walker R W, et al. How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of followup[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10172): 647-654. 

[13] 张雷 , 赵建宁 . 人工全髋关节置换术后的并发症预防 [J]. 中国 骨伤 , 2018, 31(12): 1081-1085. 

[14] 赵磊 , 刘思佳 , 周文瑞 . 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术对坐起 动作的生物力学影响 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 ( 中英文 ), 2023, 4(6): 597-601. 

[15] Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A, et al. The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2019, 4(11): 618-625. 

[16] 张卓 , 孔祥朋 , 杨敏之 , 等 . 机器人辅助人工全髋关节置换的短 期疗效分析 [J]. 骨科 , 2020, 11(4): 269-273. 

[17] Roche M. The MAKO robotic-arm knee arthroplasty system[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2021, 141(12): 2043-2047. 

[18] 张颖 , 韩慧 , 刘烨 , 等 . MAKO 机器人辅助下全膝关节置换的 手术室标准护理流程探讨 [J]. 中日友好医院学报 , 2022, 36(5): 295-297. 

[19] 孙莹 , 葛蕊 , 侯艳 , 等 . MAKO 机器人手术系统辅助下全髋关 节置换术手术配合 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 ( 中英文 ), 2020, 1(4): 280-285. 

[20] Perets I, Walsh J P, Close M R, et al. Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: clinical outcomes and complication rate[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2018, 14(4): e1912. 

[21] Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Hozack W J, et al. Patient-reported functional and satisfaction outcomes after robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective multicenter investigation[J]. J Knee Surg, 2020, 33(7): 685-690. 

[22] Smith A F, Eccles C J, Bhimani S J, et al. Improved patient satisfaction following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Knee Surg, 2021, 34(7): 730-738.