中国的机器人外科学杂志 | ISSN 2096-7721 | CN 10-1650/R

经口机器人与非机器人手术治疗舌根肿瘤的疗效对比

Comparative study on the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery and non-robotic surgery for tongue base tumors

作者:于文俊,林权泉,冯琳,张海钟,席庆

Vol. 5 No. 5 Oct. 2024 DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2024.05.034 发布日期:2024-11-27
关键词:舌根肿瘤;经口机器人手术;非机器人手术;微创外科;疗效;并发症

作者简介:

目的:比较经口机器人手术(TORS)与非机器人手术(NRS)治疗舌根肿瘤的疗效。方法:根据手 术方式不同,将 45 例舌根肿瘤患者分为 TORS 组(n=19)和 NRS 组(n=26),对比分析两组患者的手术指标及术 后并发症情况。结果:与 NRS 组相比,TORS 组手术时间更短、出血量更少、术后住院天数更短,术后复发率更 低。术后 30 d 内,NRS 组患者吞咽困难、开口受限等并发症发生率高于 TORS 组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论:TORS 治疗舌根肿瘤具有术中出血少、损伤小、术后住院时间短、术后恢复快等微创优势。

Objective: To compare the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS)and non-robotic surgery (NRS) in the treatment of tongue base tumors. Methods: A total of 45 patients with tongue base tumors treated in our hospital were selected, and they were divided into the TORS group and NRS group according to different surgical methods. The surgical indicators and postoperative complications of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: Compared with the NRS group, the operative time, bleeding volume and length of hospital stay were less in the TORS group, and the postoperative recurrence rate was less in the TORS group than that in the NRS group. The incidence rate of dysphagia and restricted mouth opening in the TORS group was lower than that in the NRS group within 30 d after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: TORS has better minimally invasive advantages in the treatment of tongue base tumors, including less intraoperative bleeding, smaller trauma, shorter length of hospital stay and faster recovery.

稿件信息

收稿日期:2023-03-27  录用日期:2023-11-29 

Received Date: 2023-03-27  Accepted Date: 2023-11-29 

基金项目:军队课题(LB201211AO10038) Foundation Item: Army Project (LB201211AO10038) 

通讯作者:席庆,Email:xiqing301@163.com 

Corresponding Author: XI Qing, Email: xiqing301@163.com 

引用格式:于文俊,林权泉,冯琳,等 . 经口机器人与非机器人手术治疗舌根肿瘤的疗效对比 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文), 2024,5(5):952-958. 

Citation: YU W J, LIN Q Q, FENG L, et al. Comparative study on the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery and non-robotic surgery for tongue base tumors [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2024, 5(5): 952-958.

参考文献

[1] Philippe G. A contemporary review of evidence for transoral robotic surgery in laryngeal cancer[J]. Frontiers in Oncology, 2018. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00121. 

[2] Mcleod I K, Mair E A, Melder P C. Potential applications of the da vinci minimally invasive surgical robotic system in otolaryngology[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2005, 84(8): 483-487. 

[3] Rinaldi V, Pagani D, Torretta S, et al. Transoral robotic surgery in the management of head and neck tumours[J].Ecancermedicalscience, 2013, 7(1): 359. 

[4] Dowthwaite S A, Franklin J H, Palma D A, et al. The role of transoral robotic surgery in the management of oropharyngeal cancer: a review of the literature[J].ISRN Oncology, 2012, 2012(24): 945162. 

[5] Moore E J, Olsen K D, Kasperbauer J L. Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of feasibility and functional outcomes. [J].Laryngoscope, 2010, 119(11): 2156-2164. 

[6] Almeida J R D, Genden E M. Robotic surgery for oropharynx cancer: promise, challenges, and future directions[J].Current Oncology Reports, 2012, 14(2): 148-157. 

[7] Weinstein G S, O’Malley, Bert W, et al. Transoral robotic surgery for advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2010, 136(11): 1079. 

[8] Sharma A, Patel S, Baik F M, et al. Survival and gastrostomy prevalence in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with transoral robotic surgery vs chemoradiotherapy[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 142(7): 691-697. 

[9] Mercante G, Ruscito P, Pellini R, et al. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for tongue base tumours[J].Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 2013, 33(4): 230-235. 

[10] Mcleod I K, Melder P C. Da Vinci robot-assisted excision of a vallecular cyst: a case report.[J].Ear Nose & Throat Journal, 2005, 84(3): 170-172. 

[11] O’Malley B W, Weinstein G S, Snyder W, et al. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms[J].The Laryngoscope, 2006.DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000227184.90514.1a. 

[12] Kayhan F T, Yigider A P, Koc A K, et al. Treatment of tongue base masses in children by transoral robotic surgery[J].European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017, 274(9): 3457-3463. 

[13] Yeh DH, Tam S, Fung K, et al. Transoral robotic surgery vs. radiotherapy for management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma-A systematic review of the literature[J].European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 41(12): 1603-1614. 

[14] Möckelmann N, Busch C J, Münscher A,, et al. Timing of neck dissection in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2015, 41(6): 773-778. 

[15] Loon J W L V, Smeele L E, Hilgers F J M, et al. Outcome of transoral robotic surgery for stage I-II oropharyngeal cancer[J].European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2014, 272(1): 175-183. 

[16] Chia S H, Gross N D, Richmon J D. Surgeon Experience and complications with transoral robotic surgery (TORS)[J]. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2013, 149(6): 885-892. 

[17] Dabas S, Dewan A, Ranjan R, et al. Transoral robotic surgery in management of oropharyngeal cancers: a preliminary experience at a tertiary cancer centre in India[J].International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2014, 20(4): 693-700. 

[18] Smith R V, Schiff B A, Garg M, et al. The impact of transoral robotic surgery on the overall treatment of oropharyngeal cancer patients[J]. Laryngoscope, 2015.DOI: 10.1002/lary.25534. 

[19] Dziegielewski P T, Teknos T N, Durmus K. Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: long-term quality of life and functional outcomes [J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2013, 139(11): 1099-1108. 

[20] Sethi R K V, Chen M M, Malloy K M. Complications of transoral robotic surgery[J].Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 2020, 53(6): 1109-1115. 

[21] Hay A, Migliacci J, Karassawa Zanoni D, et al. Haemorrhage following transoral robotic surgery[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2018, 43(2): 638-644. 

[22] Su H K, Ozbek U, Likhterov I, et al. Safety of transoral surgery for oropharyngeal malignancies: an analysis of the ACS NSQIP[J].The Laryngoscope, 2016, 126(11): 2484-2491. 

[23] Kubik M, Mandal R, Albergotti W, et al. Effect of transcervical arterial ligation on the severity of postoperative hemorrhage after transoral robotic surgery[J].Head & Neck, 2017, 39(Suppl 1): 1510- 1515. 

[24] Sharbel D, Abkemeier M, Sullivan J, et al. Transcervical arterial ligation for prevention of postoperative hemorrhage in transoral oropharyngectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Head & Neck, 2021, 43(1): 334-344. 

[25] Gleysteen J, Troob S, Light T, et al. The impact of prophylactic external carotid artery ligation on postoperative bleeding after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma[J].Oral Oncology, 2017.DOI: 10.1016/ j.oraloncology.2017.04.014. 

[26] Mann G, Hankey G J, Cameron D. Swallowing function after stroke: prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months[J].Stroke, 1999, 30(4): 744-748. 

[27] Finestone H M, Foley N C, Woodbury M G, et al. Quantifying fluid intake in dysphagic stroke patients: a preliminary comparison of oral and nonoral strategies[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2001, 82(12): 1744-1746.DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.27379. 

[28] Smithard D G, O’Neill P A, England R E, et al. The natural history of dysphagia following a stroke[J].Dysphagia, 1997, 12(4): 188-193.

本期文章
[1] 华东地区首例经口入路腔镜甲状腺癌根治术中吲哚菁绿荧光甲状旁腺血管造影术(附手术视频) [2] 腔镜手术机器人操作培训中国专家共识(2024 版) [3] 达芬奇手术机器人在肺癌治疗中的应用进展(附手术视频) [4] 5G 通信技术在机器人手术中的应用 [5] 基于奥马哈系统的管理方案联合排尿功能训练对机器人辅助原位新膀胱术后患者的影响 [6] 精准化护理在泌尿外科机器人辅助手术中的应用效果及其对护理满意度的影响 [7] 手术室保温策略与医护团队精准护理在达芬奇机器人辅助腹腔镜手术中的协同效应研究 [8] 多模式镇痛配合加速康复外科护理在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术中的应用 [9] ERAS 护理模式在达芬奇机器人辅助解剖性肝切除术中的应用效果 [10] 经口机器人与非机器人手术治疗舌根肿瘤的疗效对比 [11] 机器人辅助上尿路手术患者术后焦虑抑郁影响因素分析及管理策略研究 [12] 机器人辅助甲状腺癌根治术的效果及对切口愈合的影响 [13] 机器人辅助腹腔镜肝切除术后谵妄危险因素分析及定量预警模型建立与验证分析 [14] ERAS 理念下达芬奇机器人与单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者术后康复和疼痛的对比研究 [15] 输尿管逆行冷缺血技术在机器人辅助复杂性肾部分切除术中的应用研究 [16] 达芬奇机器人辅助乙状结肠癌外侧入路优先的定型化根治手术技术要点(附手术视频) [17] 机器人辅助全体内回肠代输尿管术治疗输尿管全段撕脱伤后输尿管全段狭窄或缺如的临床效果分析(附手术视频) [18] 经腹入路机器人辅助切除原发性腹膜后神经鞘瘤的初步应用(附手术视频) [19] 自主式口腔种植机器人术中常见故障及应对策略 [20] 两种腔内吻合方法在机器人辅助远端胃切除术后毕Ⅱ式消化道重建中的应用比较 [21] 免打结双倒刺线手工缝合法在机器人辅助全胃切除术中的应用及疗效分析(附手术视频) [22] ERSA 理念护理模式配合康复机器人辅助训练在重型颅脑损伤术后患者下肢康复护理中的运用效果 [23] 机器人辅助步态训练联合常规训练对严重烧伤后下肢运动及平衡功能障碍患者影响的前瞻性随机对照研究 [24] 不同术后镇痛方式对机器人辅助胸外科手术患者的镇痛效果比较 [25] 上肢康复机器人联合镜像疗法对脑卒中患者上肢运动功能及日常生活活动能力的疗效 [26] 基于 CiteSpace 的智能可穿戴运动康复系统在康复医学领域的研究热点与趋势分析 [27] ROSA 机器人辅助脑深部电刺激术中麻醉优化的探讨 [28] 基于酮咯酸和芬太尼的患者自控镇痛对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后急性肾损伤的作用比较 [29] 丙泊酚靶控输注麻醉对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的影响 [30] 基于加速康复理论的精细化护理对机器人辅助膝关节置换术患者的围手术期应用效果 [31] 基于 ERAS 理念的多学科协作新护理模式在机器人辅助股骨转子间骨折手术中的应用 [32] 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中系统性手术室护理 配合措施及效果分析 [33] 机器人辅助经皮微创椎弓钉内固定术治疗单节段胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效分析 [34] 基于加速康复理论的精细化护理对机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术患者的影响 [35] Robocare 全程干预模式对机器人辅助闭合复位钉棒系统内固定术后患者心理状态及功能康复效果的影响 [36] 信息识别技术联合 Mako 机器人辅助关节置换术的应用 [37] 2D 透视引导机器人辅助腰椎间盘摘除椎间融合内固定手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效 [38] 机器人辅助近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折预后不良的预测研究及策略分析 [39] 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术治疗膝骨关节炎临床效果研究 [40] 机器人辅助下经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗跟骨骨折术后并发症影响因素及模型预测分析 [41] 骨科手术机器人在骨盆骨折手术中的应用 [42] 机器人辅助手术对胸腰段骨折患者置钉准确性、创伤程度及预后的影响(附手术视频) [43] 机器人辅助技术在骨伤科的应用及展望
印象笔记
有道云笔记
微博
QQ空间
微信
二维码
意见反馈