目的：探讨加速康复外科（ERAS）护理模式在达芬奇机器人辅助解剖性肝切除术中的应用效果。 方法：基于回顾性研究，选取 2022 年 1 月—2023 年 12 月于本院在 ERAS 护理模式下行机器人辅助解剖性肝切除术 的 60 例原发性肝癌患者作为研究对象。按照术式不同将其分为机器人手术组（n=30）和腹腔镜手术组（n=30）。 机器人手术组采用达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助解剖性肝切除，腹腔镜手术组组采用腹腔镜进行解剖性肝切除。对比 分析两组患者围手术期相关数据。结果：机器人手术组 与腹腔镜手术组组在在术中出血量、首次排气时间、下床活 动时间、住院时间方面比较，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；两组患者术后 5 天 ALT、AST、TBIL 水平均呈现增 长趋势，但机器人手术组 ALT、AST、TBIL 水平低于腹腔镜手术组，且差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；机器人手 术组总并发症发生率低于腹腔镜手术组，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；两组患者术后疼痛（NRS）与护理满意度 评分差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：与腹腔镜手术相比，ERAS 护理模式下行达芬奇机器人辅助解剖性肝 切除术可减少术中出血、减轻手术创伤，且胃肠功能恢复快，在近期疗效方面具有一定的优势。

Objective: To study the clinical effect of ERAS nursing model in Da Vinci robot-assisted anatomical hepatectomy. Methods: Clinical data of 60 patients with primary liver cancer who underwent robot-assisted anatomic hepatectomy under ERAS nursing model in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups according to the different surgical methods, with 30 cases in each group. The robotic group received Da Vinci robot-assisted anatomical hepatectomy, and the laparoscopic group received laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy. Perioperative data of the two groups were compared. Results: The differences between the robotic group and the laparoscopic group in terms of intraoperative bleeding, time to first exhaustion, time to get out of bed, and length of hospital stay were statistically significant (P<0.05). ALT, AST and TBIL levels of patients in the two groups showed an increasing trend 5 days after surgery, but they were lower in the robotic group than those in the laparoscopic group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total incidence rate of complications in the robotic group was lower than that in the laparoscopic group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative pain (NRS) and nursing satisfaction scores between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with laparoscopic surgery, application of ERAS nursing model in Da Vinci robot-assisted anatomical hepatectomy can reduce intraoperative bleeding, recover gastrointestinal function quickly and alleviate surgical trauma, which has certain advantages in the short-term efficacy.

收稿日期：2024-03-30  录用日期：2024-04-19 

Received Date: 2024-03-30  Accepted Date: 2024-04-19 

基金项目：北京市自然科学基金（7204309） 

Foundation Item: Natural Science Foundation of Beijing City(7204309) 

通讯作者：潘立茹，Email：18801233352@163.com 

Corresponding Author: PAN Liru, Email: 18801233352@163.com 

引用格式：蒋萌萌，潘立茹 . ERAS 护理模式在达芬奇机器人辅助解剖性肝切除术中的应用效果 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中英文）， 2024，5（5）：959-963. 

Citation: JIANG M M, PAN L R. Application effect of ERAS nursing model in Da Vinci robot-assisted anatomical hepatectomy [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2024, 5(5): 959-963.

[1] 柏鑫 , 何金鑫 . 解剖性肝叶切除术治疗原发性肝癌的临床效果 及对患者肝功能和预后的影响 [J]. 中外医学研究 , 2023, 21(8): 2630. 

[2] 聂云贵 , 成武 , 王文儿 . 腹腔镜解剖性肝Ⅲ段切除治疗左肝区 域性肝内胆管结石临床效果 [J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志 , 2024, 36(1): 26-30, 35. 

[3] WANG Q, LI H J, DAI X M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies[J].Int J Surg, 2022. DOI: 10.1016 /j.ijsu.2022.106821. 

[4] Spiegelberg J, Iken T, Diener M K, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery for primary hepatobiliary tumors-possibilities and limitations[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2022, 14(2): 265. 

[5] Schmelzle M, Krenzien F, Schöning W, et al. Möglichkeiten und grenzen der robotischen leberchirurgie-aktueller stand 2020 possibilities and limits of robotic liver surgery-current status 2020[J]. Chirurg, 2021, 92(2): 107-114. 

[6] 李骞 , 涂志坚 , 李传富 , 等 . Davinci 机器人前入路原位右半肝 切除术一例 [J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志 , 2024, 36(1): 44-47. 

[7] Mehdorn A S, Richter F, Hess K, et al. The role of ICG in robotassisted liver resections[J].J Clin Med, 2022, 11(12): 3527. 

[8] Schmelzle M, Feldbrügge L, Ortiz Galindo S A, et al. Laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-center analysis of 600 consecutive patients in 6 years[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(8): 5854-5862. 

[9] Durán M, Briceño J, Padial A, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience[J]. World J Hepatol, 2022, 14(1): 224-233. 

[10] YAN C L, CHEN H, GUO X Z, et al. Clinical comparative analysis of enhanced-recovery-after-surgery management mode in Da Vinci robot-assisted radical laparoscopic cancer surgery[J]. Asian J Surg, 2022, 45(7): 1465-1466. 

[11] ZHAO Z M, YIN Z Z, PAN L C, et al. Robotic hepatic resection in postero-superior region of liver[J].Updates Surg, 2021, 73(3): 1007- 1014. 

[12] 宋晓波 , 肖明朝 , 易凤琼 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人手术运营效率影响 因素分析 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 ( 中英文 ), 2024, 5(1): 45-49. 

[13] Kokudo T, Takemura N, Inagaki F, et al.Laparoscopic minor liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2023, 53(11): 1087-1090. 

[14] Gupta A, Testa G. Pure laparoscopic donor right posterior sectionectomy for living donor liver transplantation: finding the balance[J]. Liver Transpl, 2022, 28(2): 167-168. 

[15] Tagaytay T G, Han D H, Chong J U, et al. Laparoscopic minor liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma in the posterosuperior segments using the rubber band technique[J].World J Surg, 2022, 46(5): 1151-1160.