机器人辅助腹腔镜手术（Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery，RLS）是一种安全、可行的手术方式， 但其操作方式可能对患者的安全性产生不良影响。通过回顾性分析相关文献，本综述总结了影响妇科 RLS 患者的安全因素，主要包括手术技巧及经验、术中沟通与合作、术中干扰等方面，其优化措施分别为加强医师培训、加强术中沟通与合作、避免手术中断，且医师培训模式的改变是优化手术的关键。医师培训模式的优化措施包括训练模式 的转变、双控制操作台模式的引入、不同手术步骤的标准化、手术室设置和人员的标准化，以及模拟器训练评分标 准和方式的多样化等，以改善 RLS 影响因素所带来的不利影响。

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RLS) is a safe and feasible approach to patients, but it might bring risk factors to patients during surgery. The factors affecting the safety of gynecological patients underwent RLS were summarized in this paper by analyzing relevant literatures retrospectively, including surgical skills and experience, intraoperative communication and cooperation, and intraoperative interference. The optimized measures to the three risk factors are strengthening training of physicians, improving intraoperative communication and cooperation, and avoiding intraoperative interruption. Among the three aspects, improvement of physician training mode is the key measure. Risk factors to gynecological patients in RLS could be improved through optimized measures, which including the transformation from surgeon oriented training to team training, the introduction of dual console mode, the standardization of surgical steps, the normalization of operating room staff and settings, and the diversification of simulator training scoring standards and methods.

收稿日期：2022-03-28  录用日期：2023-05-09 

Received Date: 2022-03-28  Accepted Date: 2023-05-09 

基金项目：中国学位与研究生教育学会重点课题（2020ZDB58）；中南大学研究生案例库建设项目（2021-512220106）；研究生教改一般项目（2021-512190108）；研究生课程思政综合研究项目（2020-512190309） 

Foundation Item: Key Project of Chinese Society of Academic Degree and Graduate Education (2020ZDB58); Construction Project of Graduate Case Base of Central South University (2021-512220106); General Project of Graduate Education Reform (2021-512190108); Comprehensive Research Project of Ideological and Political Education of Graduate Courses (2020- 512190309) 

通讯作者：符淳，Email：fuchun0814@csu.edu.cn 

Corresponding Author: FU Chun, Email: fuchun0814@csu.edu.cn 

引用格式：贾淇淇，符淳 . 机器人辅助腹腔镜妇科手术影响患者安全的因素与优化措施 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中英文），2024， 5（1）：37-44. 

Citation: JIA Q Q, FU C. Risk factors to patient safety and optimized measures in robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2024, 5(1): 37-44.

[1] Haveman I, van Weelden W J, Roovers E A, et al. Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy in different classes of obesity: a cohort study[J]. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 2022, 26(1): e2021.00077. 

[2] Gokmen Karasu A F, Kıran G, Şanlıkan F. Intraoperative complications and conversion to laparatomy in gynecologic robotic surgery[J]. J Invest Surg, 2022, 35(4): 912-915. 

[3] Uccella S, Zorzato P C, Kho R M. Incidence and prevention of vaginal cuff dehiscence after laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(3): 710-720. 

[4] Hwang J H, Kim B W, Kim S R, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy is not superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in perioperative urologic complications: a meta-analysis of 23 studies[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2020, 27(1): 38-47. 

[5] 金贝贝 , 张玉泉 , 李季 , 等 . 普通及机器人辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜在子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用比较 [J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志 ( 电子版 ), 2021, 14(3): 163-167. 

[6] 李毓 , 金悦 , 汪超 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人系统与腹腔镜在子宫内膜癌手术治疗中的对比分析 [J]. 机器人 外科学杂志 ( 中英文 ), 2021, 2(2): 77-83. 

[7] Loverix L, Salihi R R, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, et al. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2020, 30(4): 466-472. 

[8] Cucinella G, Calagna G, Romano G, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: a case-control study[J]. G Chir, 2016, 37(3): 113-117. 

[9] CHEN L, LIU L P, WEN N, et al. Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer[J].World J Clin Cases, 2019, 7(20): 3185-3193. 

[10] WANG J, LI X M, WU H T, et al. A meta-analysis of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy[J]. Dis Markers, 2020.DOI: 10.1155/2020/2503753. 

[11] Shim J I, Jo E H, Kim M, et al. A comparison of surgical outcomes between robot and laparoscopy-assisted adenomyomectomy[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(18): e15466. 

[12] Vargas M V, Moawad G N, Sievers C, et al. Feasibility, safety, and prediction of complications for minimally invasive myomectomy in women with large and numerous myomata[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24(2): 315-322. 

[13] 叶明侠 , 李震 , 俞凌 , 等 . 机器人手术技能教学在 妇科微创手术培训中的应用 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 ( 中英文 ), 2021, 2(5): 396-401. 

[14] Brinkman W, de Angst I, Schreuder H, et al. Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: time for a multidisciplinary approach?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(1): 281-287. 

[15] 孙嘉敏 , 韩丽萍 , 刘哲颖 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人宫颈癌广泛子宫切除术的学习曲线研究 [J]. 肿瘤基础与 临床 , 2020, 33(2): 113-117. 

[16] Kim S, Ryu K J, Min K J, et al. Learning curve for sentinel lymph node mapping in gynecologic malignancies[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2020, 121(4): 599-604. 

[17] van Zanten F, Schraffordt Koops S E, Pasker-De Jong P C M, et al. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpo (recto) pexy: a cumulative sum analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 221(5): 483.e1-483.e11 

[18] 董海燕 , 李丰鑫 , 庞晓燕 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人辅助卵巢囊肿剥除术作为初始术式的探讨 [J]. 腹腔镜外 科杂志 , 2021, 26(4): 303-307. 

[19] Akazawa M, Hashimoto K, Lee S L, et al. Learning curve of robotic-assisted hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage endometrial cancer: analysis of 81 cases[J]. Anticancer Res, 2021, 41(8): 4173-4178. 

[20] El-Hamamsy D, Walton T J, Griffiths T R L, et al. Surgeon-team separation in robotic theaters: a qualitative observational and interview study[J]. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surgk, 2020, 26(2): 86-91. 

[21] Krüger M, Ackermann J, Osmonov D, et al. Impact of acoustic and interactive disruptive factors during robotassisted surgery-a virtual surgical training model[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2020, 20(20): 5891. 

[22] Mathew R, Markey K, Murphy J, et al. Integrative literature review examining factors affecting patient safety with robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgeries[J]. J Nurs Scholarsh, 2018, 50(6): 645-652. 

[23] Turner T B, Kim K H. Mapping the robotic hysterectomy learning curve and re-establishing surgical training metrics[J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2021, 32(4): e58. [24] DeStephano C C, Nitsche J F, Heckman M G, et al. ACOG Simulation Working Group: a needs assessment of simulation training in OB/GYN residencies and recommendations for future research[J]. J Surg Educ, 2020, 77(3): 661-670. 

[25] Margueritte F, Sallée C, Legros M, et al. Description of an initiation program to robotic in vivo gynecological surgery for junior surgeons[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 2020, 49(3): 101627. 

[26] Klapczynski C, Sallée C, Tardieu A, et al. Training for next generation surgeons: a pilot study of robotassisted hysterectomy managed by resident using dual console[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2021, 303(4): 981-986. 

[27] 杨杪 , 王行环 , 雷红 , 等 . 显微外科训练对手术机 器人缝合技巧的强化效应研究 [J]. 中华显微外科杂志 , 2019, 42(6): 593-596. 

[28] Hall E F, Bregar A J, Robison K, et al. Ready for the robot? A cross-sectional survey of OB/GYN fellowship directors’ experience and expectations of their incoming fellow’s robotic surgical skills[J]. J Robot Surg, 2021, 15(5): 723-729. 

[29] Azadi S, Green I C, Arnold A, et al. Robotic surgery: the impact of simulation and other innovative platforms on performance and training[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(3): 490-495. 

[30] Vigo F, Egg R, Schoetzau A, et al. An interdiscip-linary team-training protocol for robotic gynecologic surgery improves operating time and costs: analysis of a 4-year experience in a university hospital setting[J]. J Robot Surg, 2022, 16(1): 89-96. 

[31] Gillespie B M, Gillespie J, Boorman R J, et al. The impact of robotic-assisted surgery on team performance: a systematic mixed studies review[J]. Hum Factors, 2021, 63(8): 1352-1379.