目的：总结机器人辅助技术在妇科领域中的相关研究进展，并对其临床效果进行评价。方法：对国 内外机器人辅助妇科手术相关的文献进行系统回顾，对机器人辅助手术适用的妇科疾病进行探讨和总结。结果：机器人辅助技术在大多数妇科良恶性肿瘤的治疗中具有良好的临床效果。结论：机器人辅助技术广泛适用于妇科良恶性肿瘤的手术，且在术后恢复、住院时间、手术并发症等方面具有一定优势。

Objective: To summarize the research progress of robot-assisted technology in gynecology and evaluate its clinical effect. Methods: Literatures related to robot-assisted gynecologic surgery at home and abroad were systematically reviewed, and the gynecological diseases suitable for robot-assisted surgery were discussed and summarized. Results: Robotassisted surgery has a good clinical effect in the treatment of most benign and malignant gynecological tumors. Conclusion: Robot-assisted technology is widely used in gynecological surgery for benign and malignant tumors, and it has certain advantages in postoperative recovery, length of hospital stay, and surgical complications.

收稿日期：2022-05-05  录用日期：2023-09-20 

Received Date: 2022-05-05  Accepted Date: 2023-09-20 

通讯作者：王冬，Email：cqwindow120@163.com 

Corresponding Author: WANG Dong, Email: cqwindow120@163.com 

引用格式：王馨，王冬 . 机器人辅助技术在妇科领域的研究进展 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志（中英文），2024，5（1）：70-74. 

Citation: WANG X, WANG D. Research progress of robot-assisted gynecologic surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2024, 5(1): 70-74.

[1] de Joliniere J B, Librino A, Dubuisson J B, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecology[J]. Front Surg, 2016. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00026. 

[2] Moon A S, Garofalo J, Koirala P, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecology[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2020, 100(2): 445-460. 

[3] Connor A, Pasic R, Quevedo A, et al. Robotic applications for benign gynecologic procedures[J]. Surg Technol Int, 2021. PMID: 34181238. 

[4] Arian S E, Munoz J L, Kim S, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: current status[J]. Robot Surg, 2017. DOI: 10.2147/RSRR.S102743. 

[5] Wright J D, Ananth C V, Lewin S N, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease[J]. JAMA, 2013, 309(7): 689-698. 

[6] Barakat E E, Bedaiwy M A, Zimberg S, et al. Roboticassisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 117(2 Pt 1): 256-266. 

[7] Soto E, Flyckt R, Falcone T. Endoscopic management of uterine fibroids: an update[J]. Minerva Ginecol, 2012, 64(6): 507-520. 

[8] Lim C S, Mowers E L, Mahnert N, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for conversion to laparotomy of laparoscopic hysterectomy in benign gynecology[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 128(6): 1295-1305. 

[9] MacLennan A H, Taylor A W, Wilson D H, et al. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery[J]. BJOG, 2000, 107(12): 1460-1470. 

[10] Seamon L G, Bryant S A, Rheaume P S, et al. Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 114(1): 16-21. 

[11] Subramaniam A, Kim K H, Bryant S A, et al. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2011, 122(3): 604-607. 

[12] Gehrig P A, Cantrell L A, Shafer A, et al. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 111(1): 41-45. 

[13] Chan J K, Gardner A B, Taylor K, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients-a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 139(2): 300-305. 

[14] Corrado G, Vizza E, Cela V, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: a multi-institutional analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2018, 44(12): 1935-1941. 

[15] Ramirez P T, Adams S, Boggess J F, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2012, 124(2): 180-184. 

[16] Boggess J F, Gehrig P A, Cantrell L, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type Ⅲ radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 199(4): 357. e1-7. 

[17] Kruijdenberg C B, van den Einden L C, Hendriks J C, et al. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2011, 120(3): 334-339. 

[18] Shazly S A, Murad M H, Dowdy S C, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 138(2): 457-471. 

[19] JIN Y M, LIU S S, CHEN J, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0193033. 

[20] Alfonzo E, Wallin E, Ekdahl L, et al. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2019. DOI: dog.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.016. 

[21] CHEN B L, JI M, LI P F, et al. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2020, 157(2): 429-436.