目的:探索 CICARE 沟通模式联合健康教育在机器人辅助结肠癌手术患者中的护理效果。方法:前瞻性选取于 2022 年 6 月—2023 年 7 月收治的 104 例达芬奇机器人辅助结肠癌手术患者,根据随机数字表法分为两组,对照组 52 例采用常规护 理干预,观察组 52 例采用 CICARE 沟通模式及健康教育干预,比较两组患者护理效果。结果:观察组下床活动时间、肠蠕 动恢复时间、肛门排气时间、胃管拔除时间、住院时间均短于对照组(P<0.05)。干预后两组患者自我护理能力量表(ESCA) 各项评分及总分、Morisky 用药依从性问卷 -8(MMAS-8)评分、医学应对方式问卷(MCMQ)面对评分、护理满意度评分 高于干预前,且观察组 ESCA 各项评分及总分、MMAS-8 评分、MCMQ 面对评分、护理满意度评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。 干预后两组患者 Piper 疲乏量表(PFS)各项评分及总分、MCMQ 屈服及回避评分低于干预前,且观察组 PFS 各项评分及总分、 MCMQ 屈服及回避评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:对机器人辅助结 肠癌手术患者进行 CICARE 沟通模式联合健康教育干预,能够加速术后康复,提高患者自我护理能力和依从性,减轻癌因疲 乏感,提高护理满意度和护理质量。
Objective: To explore the nursing effect of CICARE communication model combined with health education in patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery for colon cancer. Methods: 104 patients who underwent Da Vinci robot-assisted surgery for colon cancer from June 2022 to July 2023 were prospectively selected and divided into the control group (n=52) and the observation group (n=52) using a random number table. Patients in the control group recieved conventional nursing, while the observation group were given CICARE communication model combined with health education. The nursing effect was compared between the two groups of patients. Results: The time to out-of-bed mobilization, intestinal peristalsis recovery time, anal exhaust time, gastric tube removal time, and lenth of hospital stay were all shorter in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The exercise of self-care agency scale (ESCA) item scores and total scores, Morisky medication adherence questionnaire-8 (MMAS-8) scores, medical coping modes questionnaire (MCMQ) confronting scores, and nursing satisfaction scores were higher after intervention in the two groups than those before intervention, and the above scores were higher in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The Piper fatigue scale (PFS) item scores and total scores, and MCMQ surrender and avoidance scores were lower after intervention in the two groups than those before intervention, and they were lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The CICARE communication model combined with health education can accelerate postoperative recovery, improve patients’ self-care ability and adherence, alleviate cancercaused fatigue, and improve nursing satisfaction and quality in patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery for colon cancer.
基金项目:重庆市大足区科技发展项目(DZKJ,2017ACC1009)
Foundation Item: Science and Technology Development Project of Dazu District, Chongqing (DZKJ, 2017ACC1009)
引用格式:唐源,刘霞 .CICARE 沟通模式联合健康教育在机器人辅助结肠癌手术患者中的效果 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文),2025,6(2): 313-318.
Citation: TANG Y, LIU X. Effect of the CICARE communication model combined with health education in patients undergoing robotassisted surgery for colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2025, 6(2): 313-318.
通讯作者(Corresponding Author):刘霞(LIU Xia),Email:946128390@qq.com
[1] Zamel O N, Inocian E P, Alshehry A S, et al. Quality of life among breast and colon cancer patients before and after first-cycle chemotherapy[J]. J Holist Nurs, 2021, 39(2): 116-125.
[2] 刘庆荣 , 贾晋莉 , 何小东 . 基于 ERAS 理念的手术室护理在 4K 腹腔 镜结肠癌根治术中的应用 [J]. 护理实践与研究 , 2023, 20(4): 613-616.
[3] 冯新新 , 张海伟 . 达芬奇辅助左半结肠癌根治全腔内重叠侧侧吻合 术的护理配合 [J]. 中国微创外科杂志 , 2023, 23(9): 718-720.
[4] 尹薇 . 围术期快速康复护理对腹腔镜结肠癌切除术后手术结局、疼 痛及胃肠功能的影响 [J]. 国际护理学杂志 , 2022, 41(7): 1281-1283.
[5] 陈丽明 , 康小云 .NBASS-APS 疼痛管理模式联合个性化心理护理对 结肠癌并急性肠梗阻手术患者术后心理状态及疼痛控制的影响 [J]. 国际护理学杂志 , 2023, 42(21): 3907-3910.
[6] Delisle M, Fitch M, Nagaratnam K, et al. Factors influencing cancer survivors’ experiences with follow-up cancer care: results from the panCanadian experiences of cancer patients in transition study survey[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2022, 30(11): 9559-9575.
[7] 宋亚平 , 郭玉梅 , 卢林芝 . 全媒体健康教育在首次接受无痛结肠镜检 查人群中的应用效果评价 [J]. 山西医药杂志 , 2022, 51(21): 2489-2493.
[8] 中国抗癌协会 , 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会 . 中国恶性肿瘤整合 诊治指南 -结肠癌部分[J].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(1): 1-12.
[9] 刘延锦 , 余溯源 , 郭丽娜 , 等 . 汉化修正版自我护理能力评估量表用 于成年人群中的信效度研究围 [J]. 重庆医学 , 2018, 47(33): 4266-4269.
[10] Piper B F, Dibble S L, Dodd M J, et al. The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: Psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer[J]. Oncol Nurs Forum, 1998, 25(4): 677-684.
[11] Morisky D E, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, et al. Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting[J]. J Clin Hypertens(Greenwich), 2008, 10(5): 348-354.
[12] 沈晓红 , 姜乾金 . 医学应对方式问卷中文版 701 例测试报告 [J]. 中国 行为医学科学 , 2000, 9(1): 18.
[13] Senft J D, Brück B B, Poß-Doering R, et al. Need for nursing care after laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer surgery: a claims data analysis in German primary care[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(7): 2937-2944.
[14] 龚阳 , 陈淑瑜 , 刘萍 , 等 . 叙事护理对结肠癌手术患者机体康复、心 理韧性及自我效能感的影响 [J]. 消化肿瘤杂志 ( 电子版 ), 2021, 13(1): 70-74.
[15] Selby K, Sedki M, Levine E, et al. Test performance metrics for breast, cervical, colon, and lung cancer screening: a systematic review[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2023, 115(4): 375-384.
[16] 顾洁 , 孙守正 . 加速康复外科护理应用于结肠癌围手术期对护理 质量及患者自理能力的干预作用 [J]. 山西医药杂志 , 2022, 51(7): 832-834.
[17] Hodges S S. A single-center retrospective chart review to determine whether the presence of comorbidities affects colon cancer screenings in African Americans[J]. Gastroenterol Nurs, 2020, 43(1): 40-52.
[18] 阳霞 , 吴若梅 , 林秀梅 .Teach-back 理论健康教育对结肠癌术后患者 的影响 [J]. 齐鲁护理杂志 , 2022, 28(18): 18-21.
[19] 刘祝容 , 丘运红 , 杨志丽 , 等 .CICARE 流程化沟通管理对老年呼吸 内科护患纠纷的影响 [J]. 齐鲁护理杂志 , 2023, 29(9): 137-139.
[20] 沈红 , 雷舒 . 基于 5 个框架回授法的健康教育对结肠癌化学治疗患 者的干预效果 [J]. 成都医学院学报 , 2023, 18(4): 515-519.
[21] 朱琳 .CICARE 沟通模式在提高门诊老年患者护理服务满意度中的应 用 [J]. 贵州医药 , 2022, 46(5): 839-840.
[22] 方梅 , 阴玥 , 郭婷婷 . 基于 CICARE 沟通模式的激励性护理对神经内 科患者下床活动依从性及跌倒恐惧心理的影响 [J]. 海南医学 , 2023, 34(7): 1024-1027.
[23] 尹文静 , 朱蓓 , 张曙 , 等 . 基于 CICARE 沟通模式的动机性访谈在中 青年炎症性肠病患者中的应用 [J]. 河北医药 , 2023, 45(13): 2060-2064.
[24] 张茜 . 围术期三步护理模式对结肠癌患者手术耐受、身心应激及手 术结局的影响 [J]. 护理实践与研究 , 2022, 19(3): 428-433.
[25] 郑晓蓝 , 徐碧文 , 禤秉金 , 等 .CICARE 沟通模式配合缩短禁饮禁食 时间对妇科腹腔镜手术患者康复的干预效果 [J]. 护理实践与研究 , 2023, 20(2): 250-255.