Advertisement
中国的机器人外科学杂志 | ISSN 2096-7721 | CN 10-1650/R

机器人辅助免溶脂技术在男性乳腺发育手术中的应用

Application of robot-assisted non-lipolysis technique on gynecomastia

作者:刘源源,朱见,刘长瑞,王丹,曹宪姣,刘懿心,翟东亮,贺青卿

Vol. 6 No. 1 Jan. 2025 DOI: 10.12180/j.issn.2096-7721.2025.01.016 发布日期:2025-02-10
关键词:男性乳腺发育症;机器人辅助手术;免溶脂技术;乳房皮下腺体切除术

作者简介:

目的:探讨经腋窝入路机器人辅助免溶脂乳房皮下腺体切除术在治疗男性乳腺发育症中的可行性、安全性和 有效性。方法:回顾性分析 2021 年 10 月—2023 年 10 月中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六○医院行机器人辅助 乳房皮下腺体切除术的 52 例男性乳腺发育症患者的临床资料,根据是否采用溶脂技术分为机器人辅助免溶脂组(观 察组,n=20)和机器人辅助溶脂组(对照组,n=32)。统计、分析两组患者的一般资料及手术情况,并随访两组患 者术后并发症发生情况和术后美容效果满意度。结果:所有患者均顺利完成手术。两组患者的一般临床资料(年龄、 BMI、病程、血清泌乳素水平和 Simon 分级)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组患者的围手术期指标(双 侧手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后引流管留置时间和住院时间)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 两组患者术后 24 h 疼痛评分及术后并发症发生情况(乳头乳晕坏死、皮下血肿、皮下血清肿、皮肤感染和脂肪液化) 比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者对术后美容效果满意度的评分(胸部整体外观、乳头乳晕及术区皮 肤感觉和整体满意度)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:经腋窝入路机器人辅助免溶脂乳房皮下腺体切 除术治疗男性乳腺发育症是可行、安全、有效的,且美容效果满意度高。

Objective: To explore the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of transaxillary robot-assisted non-lipolysis subcutaneous mastectomy in the treatment of gynecomastia. Methods: 52 patients with gynecomastia who underwent robotassisted subcutaneous mastectomy in the 960th Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force from Oct. 2021 to Oct. 2023 were selected and divided into the observation group (robot-assisted non-lipolysis group, n=20) and the control group (robot-assisted lipolysis group, n=32). A retrospective analysis was performed. The general data and surgical conditions of the two groups were statistically analyzed, and they were followed up for the postoperative cosmetic satisfaction and occurrence of complications. Results: All the surgeries were completed successfully. There was no significant difference in the general data (age, BMI, disease duration, serum prolactin level, and Simon grading) between the two groups (P>0.05), and the perioperative indicators (bilateral operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, postoperative drain retention time, and hospitalization time) between the two groups were statistically different (P<0.05). Comparison of 24h postoperative pain scores and the occurrence of postoperative complications (nipple areola necrosis, subcutaneous hematoma, subcutaneous seroma, skin infection and fat liquefaction) between the two groups showed no significant difference (P>0.05). The scores of patients’ satisfaction with postoperative cosmetic results (overall appearance of the chest, skin sensation of the nipple areola and operative area, and overall satisfaction) between the two groups was statistically different (P<0.05). Conclusion: For gynecomastia, robotic-assisted nonlipolysis subcutaneous mastectomy with a transaxillary approach is practical, secure, and highly cosmetical pleasing.

稿件信息

基金项目:中国人民解放军联勤保障部队重点学科项目(202204011069) 

Foundation Item: Key Discipline Project of the Joint Security Force of the People’s Liberation Army of China (202204011069) 

通讯作者:贺青卿,Email:heqingqing@yeah.net 

Corresponding Author: HE Qingqing, Email: heqingqing@yeah.net 

引用格式:刘源源,朱见,刘长瑞,等 . 机器人辅助免溶脂技术在男性乳腺发育手术中的应用 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志(中英文), 2025,6(1):95-100. 

Citation: LIU Y Y, ZHU J, LIU C R, et al. Application of robot-assisted non-lipolysis technique on gynecomastia [J]. Chinese  Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2025, 6(1): 95-100.

参考文献

[1] Kanakis G A, Nordkap L, Bang A K, et al. EAA clinical practice guidelines-gynecomastia evaluation and management[J]. Andrology, 2019, 7(6): 778-793. 

[2] QU S, ZHANG W, LI S, et al. The vacuum-assisted breast biopsy system is an effective strategy for the treatment of gynecomastia[J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2021, 45(2): 404-410. 

[3] Murugesan L, Karidis A. External quilting: new technique to avoid haematoma in gynaecomastia surgery[J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2020, 44(1): 45-51. 

[4] Carvajal J, Carvajal M. Percutaneous intradermal purse-string closure for correction of male tuberous nipple-areola complex deformity[J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2021, 45(5): 2000-2004. 

[5] YANG Y, MU D, XU B, et al. Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy plus liposuction via a single axillary incision for gynecomastia in Asian patients: a report of 45 cases[J]. Surgery, 2021, 170(1): 39-46. 

[6] 刘婷婷 , 曹磊 , 王莉 , 等 . 单孔腔镜腋窝入路非溶脂治疗腺体型 及腺体脂肪混合型男性乳房发育临床观察 [J]. 社区医学杂志 , 2023, 21(20): 1058-1062. 

[7] 吕晨光 , 郭一君 , 何淼 , 等 . 免溶脂技术经腋窝腔镜手术治疗男 性乳房发育症效果研究 [J]. 创伤与急危重病医学 , 2022, 10(5): 385-386, 390. 

[8] 杨婷 , 欧阳杰 , 梁卓虹 , 等 . 腋窝入路单孔腔镜法治疗男性乳 房发育症的临床报告 [J]. 临床普外科电子杂志 , 2022, 10(3): 51-54. 

[9] Raffone A, Travaglino A, Raimondo D, et al. Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 157(1): 1-10. 

[10] Hancock K J, Klimberg V S, Nunez-lopez O, et al. Optimizing outcomes in colorectal surgery: cost and clinical analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic approaches to colon resection[J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16(1): 107-112. 

[11] 王丹 , 朱见 , 王军 , 等 . 机器人甲状腺手术的发展历史、现状和 未来展望 [J]. 机器人外科学杂志 ( 中英文 ), 2022, 3(4): 249-256. 

[12] Joo O Y, Song S Y, Lew D H, et al. Robotic harvest of a latissimus dorsi flap using a single-port surgical robotic system in breast reconstruction[J]. Archives of Plastic Surgery, 2021, 48(6): 577-582. 

[13] 姜军 , 范林军 . 达芬奇机器人在乳腺外科的应用 [J]. 中华乳腺 病杂志 ( 电子版 ), 2020, 14(1): 61. 

[14] 师丙帅 , 韩宝三 , 汪海滨 , 等 . 中国男性乳房发育临床诊治专家 共识 [J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志 , 2023, 15(4): 313-323. 

[15] Daniels J, Brickstock A, Charlton R. Gynaecomastia[J]. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069771. 

[16] Reinehr T, Kulle A, Barth A, et al. Sex hormone profile in pubertal boys with gynecomastia and pseudogynecomastia[J]. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2020. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/ dgaa044. 

[17] 赵子翔 , 王宇翀 , 薛春雨 . 男性乳房发育症的病理病因及治疗 [J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志 , 2023, 34(6): 382-386. 

[18] 陈达丰 , 周松 , 张雪惠 , 等 . 青年男性乳房发育症的流行病学 特点及其危险因素分析 [J]. 中国实验诊断学 , 2019, 23(7): 1151- 1155. 

[19] Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview[J]. International Journal of Cancer, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33588. 

[20] 尹俊辉 , 冀亮 , 苏航 , 等 . 男性乳腺发育症的外科治疗 [J]. 中国 美容整形外科杂志 , 2022, 33(2): 100-102, 131. 

[21] Innocenti A, Melita D, Dreassi E. Incidence of complications for different approaches in gynecomastia correction: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2022, 46(3): 1025- 1041. 

[22] XIONG H, CHEN Z, XU L, et al. Contrast of mastoscopic and conventional axillary lymph node dissection of patients with breast cancer: Meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Control: Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center, 2020, 27(2): 1073274820932987. 

[23] Lai H W, Mok C W, Chang Y T, et al. Endoscopic assisted breast conserving surgery for breast cancer: Clinical outcome, learning curve, and patient reported aesthetic results from preliminary 100 procedures[J]. Eur J of Surg Oncol, 2020, 46(8): 1446-1455. 

[24] Franceschini G, Visconti G, Garganese G, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy combined with endoscopic immediate reconstruction via axillary incision for breast cancer: a preliminary experience of an innovative technique[J]. The Breast Journal, 2020, 26(2): 206-210. 

[25] 李文涛 , 陈海军 , 司丕蕾 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人辅助下保留乳头乳 晕的乳房切除并即刻假体乳房重建 1 例 [J]. 中华实用诊断与治 疗杂志 , 2021, 35(12): 1189-1190. 

[26] LIU P, ZHANG Y, QI X, et al. Unilateral axilla-bilateral areola approach for thyroidectomy by da Vinci robot: 500 cases treated by the same surgeon[J]. Journal of Cancer, 2019, 10(16): 3851-3859. 

[27] Sarfati B, Toesca A, Roulot A, et al. Transumbilical single-port robotically assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: a cadaveric Study[J]. Plast and Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2020, 8(5): e2778. 

[28] HUANG Z, QIN H, LIAO J, et al. Comparison between 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic thyroidectomy for benign and malignant lesions: a Meta-analysis[J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 19(1): 23. 

[29] 王猛 , 郑鲁明 , 周鹏 , 等 . 腔镜与机器人甲状腺手术治疗甲状 腺微小乳头状癌的对比研究 [J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗 , 2021, 34(12): 1117-1122. 

[30] 周鹏 , 庄大勇 , 贺青卿 , 等 . 机器人与开放手术治疗直径大于 5 cm 甲状腺良性肿瘤效果对比 [J]. 国际外科学杂志 , 2020, 47(11): 739-743. 

[31] Kapoor R, Dharmalingam G C, Sonkar A A, et al. Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy plus liposuction via a single axillary incision for gynecomastia: views from developing world[J]. Surgery, 2022, 171(6): 1704-1707. 

[32] Danker S, Yarholar L M. Gynecomastia treatment through open resection and pectoral high-definition liposculpture[J]. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2022, 150(5): 1106e-1107e. 

[33] Adhikari S. Minimal incision technique for gynecomastia[J]. J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 2021, 14(3): 344-350. 

[34] 贺青卿 , 于芳 , 范子义 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人乳房皮下腺体切除 治疗男性乳房发育症一例 [J]. 中华内分泌杂志 , 2016, 10(2) : 181-183. 

[35] 王刚 , 范子义 , 朱见 , 等 . 达芬奇机器人乳腺皮下腺体切除 术 10 例临床分析 [J]. 中华乳腺病杂志 ( 电子版 ), 2018, 12(1): 17-21.

本期文章
[1] 机器人辅助手术治疗子宫内膜癌中国专家共识(2025 年版):附手术视频 [2] 手术机器人在儿童泌尿外科下尿路重建手术中的应用 [3] 机器人辅助前哨淋巴结活检在早期子宫内膜癌手术中的应用 [4] 根治性前列腺切除术的演进与三种术式比较 [5] 达芬奇机器人手术系统在非小细胞肺癌手术中的成本效益分析 [6] 自主式口腔种植机器人辅助下颌 all-on-6 种植即刻修复一例报道(附手术视频) [7] 加速康复外科理念在机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术护理中的应用 [8] 机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术患者采取术中体温管理后围术期低体温发生情况及其影响因素 [9] 参与共治理念下心理 - 认知干预在经口入路机器人辅助甲状腺手术中的应用 [10] 腹腔镜手术虚拟现实系统在外科医师培训中的应用 [11] 电刺激联合盆底肌肉训练辅以心理干预疗法对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后患者尿失禁的影响 [12] 肾肿瘤解剖评分联合肾周脂肪粘连评分对囊性肾肿物患者围手术期结果的预测价值分析 [13] 机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术患者术后早期并发症危险因素分析及应对策略研究 [14] 机器人辅助免溶脂技术在男性乳腺发育手术中的应用 [15] 机器人辅助保留十二指肠胰头切除术治疗婴儿高胰岛素血症的病例探讨(附手术视频) [16] 基于眼动追踪技术足踝运动认知双重任务评估系统的信效度研究 [17] 任务导向型上肢康复机器人训练在脑卒中后上肢功能恢复中的疗效研究 [18] 手部康复训练联合上肢康复机器人在脑梗死上肢功能障碍患者中的应用效果 [19] 外骨骼机器人步态训练系统联合经颅直流电刺激对脑梗死患者下肢运动功能及步行能力恢复的疗效研究 [20] 亚麻醉剂量艾司氯胺酮联合肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术患者中的应用效果 [21] 机器人辅助下乳腺癌根治术患者行超声引导下Ⅱ型胸神经阻滞术后镇痛效果及影响因素 [22] 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞麻醉联合静脉滴注纳布啡在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者中的应用效果 [23] 硬膜外麻醉联合全身麻醉在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者中的应用效果 [24] 5G 远程机器人辅助结肠癌根治术一例报道并文献复习(附手术视频) [25] 基于全球首例 5G 远程机器人辅助袖状胃切除术的可行性分析(附手术视频) [26] 5G 远程机器人辅助远端胃癌根治术一例报道(附手术视频) [27] 基于 5G 网络的图迈 ® 手术机器人远程动物实验研究 [28] “双中心”背景下 5G 远程机器人外科的发展机遇与挑战 [29] 5G 远程机器人手术的应用现状及展望
印象笔记
有道云笔记
微博
QQ空间
微信
二维码
意见反馈