机器人手术与腹腔镜手术对外科医生影响的比较

摘要/Abstract

微创手术使患者获益的同时也增加了外科医生的工作负荷，包括生理负荷和认知负荷。肌肉骨骼疾病是微创外科医生最常见的职业病，相比传统腹腔镜手术，达芬奇机器人系统因其特殊的人体工程学设计，极大程度地减少了外科医生的肌肉骨骼与精神压力相关疾病，减轻了外科医生的生理和认知负荷。因此，分析比较达芬奇机器人手术和腹腔镜手术在生理负荷和认知负荷方面对外科医生的影响，有利于相关技术操作的改进及微创手术的发展。

Minimally invasive surgery brings benefits to patients, but also increases the workload to the surgeons, including physiological and cognitive load. Musculoskeletal diseases have become the most common occupational diseases to minimally invasive surgeons. Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, the Da Vinci robot system greatly reduces surgeons’ musculoskeletal and mental stress due to its special ergonomic design. So the physiological and cognitive load to surgeons is reduced. Therefore, this review analyzes and compares the impact of laparoscopic surgery and Da Vinci robotic surgery on the physiological load and cognitive load to surgeons, hopefully it may improve related technical operations and promote the development of minimally invasive surgery.

稿件信息

参考文献

[1] Zihni A, Gerull W D, Cavallo J A, et al.Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance[J]. J Surg Res, 2018, 223(1): 29-33.

[2] Lee G, Sutton E, Clanton T, et al.Higher physical workload risks with NOTES versus laparoscopy: a quantitative ergonomic assessment[J]. Surg Endosc, 2011, 25 (5): 1585-1593.

[3] Alleblas C C, Velthuis S, Nieboer T E, et al.The Physical Workload of Surgeons: A Comparison of SILS and Conventional Laparoscopy[J]. Surg Innov, 2015, 22 (4): 376-381.

[4] Koca D, Yildiz S, Soyupek F, et al. Physical and mental workload in single-incision laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopy[J]. Surg Innov, 2015, 22 (3): 294-302.

[5] Plerhoples T A, Hernandez-Boussard T, Wren S M.The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery[J]. J Robot Surg, 2012, 6 (1): 65-72.

[6] Santos-Carreras L, Hagen M, Gassert R, et al.Survey on surgical instrument handle design: ergonomics and acceptance[J]. Surg Innov, 2012, 19 (1): 50-59.

[7] Alleblas C, de Man A M, Van den Haak L, et al. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons Performing Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Systematic Review[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 266 (6): 905- 920.

[8] Wauben L S, Van Veelen M A, Gossot D, et al. Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20 (8): 1268-1274.

[9] Franasiak J, Ko E M, Kidd J, et al. Physical strain and urgent need for ergonomic training among gynecologic oncologists who perform minimally invasive surgery[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2012, 126 (3): 437-442.

[10] Catanzarite T, Tan-Kim J, Menefee S A.Ergonomics in gynecologic surgery[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 30 (6): 432-440.

[11] Nakata M.Trends in research and prevention policies for work-related musculoskeletal disorders at the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) [J]. Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi, 2002, 44 (2): 64-68.

[12] Luger T, Maher C G, Rieger M A, et al.Work-break schedules for preventing musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders in healthy workers[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 7(7): D12886.

[13] Stucky C H, Cromwell K D, Voss R K, et al.Surgeon symptoms, strain, and selections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical ergonomics[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2018, 27(1): 1-8.

[14] Lawson E H, Curet M J, Sanchez B R, et al. Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project[J]. J Robot Surg, 2007, 1 (1): 61-67.

[15] Berguer R, Smith W. An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity[J]. J Surg Res, 2006, 134 (1): 87-92.

[16] Seideman C A, Bagrodia A, Gahan J, et al.Roboticassisted pyeloplasty: recent developments in efficacy, outcomes, and new techniques[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2013, 14 (1): 37-40.

[17] Patel V R, Tully A S, Holmes R, et al.Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting-the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases[J]. J Urol, 2005, 174 (1): 269-272.

[18] Lee G I, Lee M R, Clanton T, et al.Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28 (2): 456-465.

[19] Dalager T, Jensen P T, Eriksen J R, et al.Surgeons’ posture and muscle strain during laparoscopic and robotic surgery[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(6): 756-766.

[20] Zihni A M, Ohu I, Cavallo J A, et al.Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28 (12): 3379-3384.

[21] Zarate R J, Zihni A M, Ohu I, et al.Ergonomic analysis of laparoscopic and robotic surgical task performance at various experience levels[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33 (6): 1938-1943.

[22] Dalsgaard T, Jensen M D, Hartwell D, et al.Robotic Surgery I s Less Physically Demanding Than Laparoscopic Surgery: Paired Cross Sectional Study[J]. Ann Surg, 2020, 271 (1): 106-113.

[23] Hislop J, Tirosh O, Mccormick J, et al.Muscle activation during traditional laparoscopic surgery compared with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34 (1): 31-38.

[24] Yurko Y Y, Scerbo M W, Prabhu A S, et al.Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool[J]. Simul Healthc, 2010, 5 (5): 267-271.

[25] Haji F A, Rojas D, Childs R, et al.Measuring cognitive load: performance, mental effort and simulation task complexity[J]. Med Educ, 2015, 49 (8): 815-827.

[26] Wilson M R, Poolton J M, Malhotra N, et al. Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX) [J]. World journal of surgery, 2011, 35 (9): 1961-1969.

[27] Moore L J, Wilson M R, Mcgrath J S, et al.Surgeons’ display reduced mental effort and workload while performing robotically assisted surgical tasks, when compared to conventional laparoscopy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29 (9): 2553-2560.

[28] Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer J J, et al.Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24 (2): 377- 382.

[29] Singh H, Modi H N, Ranjan S, et al.Robotic Surgery Improves Technical Performance and Enhances Prefrontal Activation During High Temporal Demand[J]. Annals of biomedical engineering, 2018, 46 (10): 1621- 1636.

[30] Paggetti G, Leff D R, Orihuela-Espina F, et al.The role of the posterior parietal cortex in stereopsis and handeye coordination during motor task behaviours[J]. Cogn Process, 2015, 16 (2): 177-190.

[31] Wanzel K R, Hamstra S J, Anastakis D J, et al.Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills[J]. Lancet, 2002, 359 (9302): 230-231.

[32] Sack A T, Hubl D, Prvulovic D, et al.The experimental combination of rTMS and fMRI reveals the functional relevance of parietal cortex for visuospatial functions[J]. Cognitive Brain Research, 2002, 13 (1): 85-93.

[33] Van der Schatte O R, Van’T H C, Ruurda J P, et al. Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23 (6): 1365-1371.

[34] Lee G I, Lee M R, Clanton T, et al.Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28 (2): 456-465.

[35] Klein M I, Warm J S, Riley M A, et al.Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces[J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26 (8): 1089-1094.

[36] Hubert N, Gilles M, Desbrosses K, et al.Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon’s physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2013, 9 (2): 142-147.

[37] Weber P A, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al.Teleroboticassisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002, 45 (12): 1689-1694, 1695-1696.

[38] Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al.Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery[J]. Nature, 2001, 413 (6854): 379-380.

[39] Choussein S, Srouji S S, Farland L V, et al.Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25 (1): 76-83.

[40] Dwyer A, Huckleby J, Kabbani M, et al.Ergonomic assessment of robotic general surgeons: a pilot study[J]. J Robot Surg, 2019, 14(3): 387-392.

[41] Mcdonald M E, Ramirez P T, Munsell M F, et al. Physician pain and discomfort during minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 134 (2): 243-247.

[42] Craven R, Franasiak J, Mosaly P, et al.Ergonomic deficits in robotic gynecologic oncology surgery: a need for intervention[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2013, 20 (5): 648-655.

[43] Mohr C J, Nadzam G S, Curet M J.Totally robotic Rouxen-Y gastric bypass[J]. Arch Surg, 2005, 140 (8): 779- 786.

[44] Talamini M A, Chapman S, Horgan S, et al.A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17 (10): 1521-1524.

[45] Craven R, Franasiak J, Mosaly P, et al.Ergonomic deficits in robotic gynecologic oncology surgery: a need for intervention[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2013, 20 (5): 648-655.

[46] Hubert N, Gilles M, Desbrosses K, et al.Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon’s physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2013, 9 (2): 142-147.

[47] Franasiak J, Craven R, Mosaly P, et al.Feasibility and acceptance of a robotic surgery ergonomic training program[J]. JSLS, 2014, 18 (4):e2014.00166.

[0]	机器人手术治疗结肠脾曲和胰尾同时性肿瘤一例报道
[1]	机器人辅助腹腔镜完全体内尿流改道的应用现状
[2]	机器人手术在妇科领域的应用现状及进展
[3]	手术机器人辅助下后侧入路腰椎间融合的术中护理配合
[4]	机器人手术与腹腔镜手术对外科医生影响的比较
[5]	机器人手术与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺良性结节的临床疗效及创伤应激反应对比分析
[6]	机器人经腹腔入路腹膜后肿瘤切除术的临床应用
[7]	联合保留最大尿道长度和膀胱颈的尿道重建术在机器人前列腺癌根治术早期尿控中的应用